Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments
Search

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

Mozilla Announces Extend Firefox Contest Winners

Posted by CowboyNeal on Fri Mar 03, 2006 07:33 AM
from the best-of-show dept.
Mozilla The Internet Programming IT Technology
Foxy Betty writes "Mozilla Corporation has announced the winners of the Extend Firefox Contest, a project initiated to encourage development of extensions for the Firefox Web browser. A panel of industry notables reviewed more than 200 extensions submitted to the contest."
+ -
story
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.

Mozilla Announces Extend Firefox Contest Winners 50 Comments More /

 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
  • How about upgrading the windows version without leaving the old version number in the add/remove programs? I have to update 40 or 50 machines at a time and it's a pain uninstalling before installing.

    • Re:improved updater (Score:4, Informative)

      by tpgp (48001) on Friday March 03 2006, @08:34AM (#14841978) Homepage
      How about upgrading the windows version without leaving the old version number in the add/remove programs? I have to update 40 or 50 machines at a time and it's a pain uninstalling before installing.

      This blog [blogspot.com] suggests that the issue your complaining about was fixed around a year ago.

      Or perhaps I misunderstood your problem?

  • A bit staid? (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Ithika (703697) on Friday March 03 2006, @07:50AM (#14841813) Homepage
    They're probably really nice and elegant and all that but ... are they not just a wee bitty dull? I mean, two out of the three winners appear to create thumbnails of pages (whether from the history or other open pages). And while Web Developer is a fantastic package it's hardly cutting edge and new. I was hoping for something with real pizzaz. Something where the very idea and description was enough to make me go, "wow".

    Anyone else find it a bit anticlimactic?
    • The only extension that i've ever used (and don't mind but wouldn't consider it essential to my browsing experience) is Sage [mozilla.org] and that came a lousy second place to Viamatic Foxprose [mozilla.org] - something that appears to be wholly useless in the 'Most Innovative' category.

    • I thought the Separe extension was completely useless. If you really want to visually separate tabs, just open a new window and start fresh. That, or get glasses if you can't scan your tabs.

      I suppose at some point FF extensions have to hit a wall for new and innovative things. Personally, I'm still waiting for the "don't use 300MB of memory" extension.

      • I'm still waiting for the "don't use 300MB of memory" extension.

        That's easily solved. Simply remove all but 256MB of RAM from your computer, and disable any swap space you had configured, and Firefox's memory usage will fall by at least 15%.
      • Let's not get ahead of ourselves. I want the "Don't use 1GB of memory" extension first.
      • I run Firefox in Linux and don't have any memory problems with Firefox. gconfd-2, on the other hand, gobbles up 100M or so overnight, so I end up restarting Firefox just to get gconfd-2 to restart.

        Can anyone explain why a configuration daemon eats up 100M overnight? When I start it up, it only takes about 10M.
    • I was hoping for something with real pizzaz. Something where the very idea and description was enough to make me go, "wow"

      Well one of the nice things about open source is that one idea tends to spawn other ideas, in other words IMHO it tends to be evolutionary rather revolutionary, perhaps this years winners will act as the catalyst(s) that lead to one or more extensions that give you that "wow" feelin'. Remember FireFox is still (relatively speaking) a young "platform" and there have already been quite

    • Re:A bit staid? (Score:4, Insightful)

      by WiFiBro (784621) on Friday March 03 2006, @08:20AM (#14841926)
      Web Developer may be totally useless for end-users, but for web page developers it is amazing, it is really grabbing the html by the balls.
    • Install this [mozilla.org]to read the following:

      US3KDP6BklCiVjtyJft3Yw==

      use password: funky0011-pass
    • Web developer is a god send for people who do web development for a living. I don't know how people get by without it. Seriously. It has so many useful features that I can't think of a day I've gone without using it. That, along with the Venkman Javascript debugger, have made my life as a web developer 10 times easier. Microsoft et al should have stuff like this for web development environments.
      • It'd be nice is Venkman was updated for 1.5. I loved the thing, but left it behind when I upgraded.

        On a related note, Eclipse has the Ajax Tools Framework [eclipse.org] proposal that looks to be very promising for developers. I currently use Eclipse and the WTP for JSP/Struts development, and its excellent, but debugging javascript is still a pain.
    • One of the finalists really stood out to me, Platypus [mozdev.org], which allows users to dynamically edit the sites they visit and then be able to save the changes to a GreaseMonkey script. It works great on getting rid of some of those annoyances on sites you visit.
      • One is a ripoff of OS X Expose. The other is a copy of an IE 7.0 feature.

        Reveal is composed by 3 different features, and one of them is tab previewing, but you have search bar where you can "filter" thumbnails by their characteristics, and also show thumbnails of the history of that tab. Really, not similar to Expose or IE 7.

        Showcase (which is the extension I developed) is not a copy of IE 7. The idea behind it was to be able to see tabs from windows other than the current one, so you can access them
  • Scrapbook looks interesting. Looks like a better way to re-visit older pages without using the history. Web Developer is dang near indespensible for anybody who does anything with web development. Not a surprise that Chris got top prize for it. The rest of it - meh - doesn't suit my web habits. Expose for FIrefox, big whoop. I barely use expose on the Mac. The closest thing that I've seen for good tab visual managment is color coding via domain. Some of these extensions probably have that; I didn't l
  • Download one link, selected links or all the links of a page at the maximum speed with a single click......FlashGot offers also a Build Gallery functionality which helps to synthetize full media galleries in one page, from serial contents previously scattered on several pages, for easy and fast "download all"


    Great extension [mozilla.org] for Firefox...just don't sue them for Rhyming-Name Infringement ;)

  • DANGER (Score:5, Funny)

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 03 2006, @07:57AM (#14841842)
    Do not install all the entrants at once. It would be bad. [splasho.com]

  • Seeing as the linked page is useless to those of us running non-Firefox 1.5 browsers (Mozilla 1.7.12 here), I looked up the details of what the winners actually are, and thought I'd share ...

    Grand Prize Category Winners:

    Best New Extension Overall: Reveal by Michael Wu
    See everything. Reveal allows you to see thumbnails of pages in your session history and quickly find the page you want. Reveal also includes a magnifying glass to help you see everything.
    Best Upgraded Extension: Web Developer by Chris Ped
  • Just a note to say that if Opera users want to experience thumbnails, the latest tech preview has 'em. Just mouseover a tab - thumbnail for the page pops up near-instantly.
  • It would be cool if we could have the user agent switcher tool with the capability to assign a particular user agent with a particular site and automatically switch upon loading a site. And the switch must be for a specific tab not all open tabs.

    - For example I might want the switcher to automatically switch to IE7/XP while visiting my bank's site that expects IE.
    - But I may want the switcher to automatically switch to Googlebot while visiting password-protected news sites so that I can go directly in.
  • I wish there was an easier way to sidestep version requirements of extensions. I'm often stuck choosing between security updates and what I consider essential functionality and features. For example, I love TabBrowser Preferences, but its latest version isn't compatible with the latest Firefox v1.5.0.1 so I stick with 1.5. For the longest time after the 1.0 launch, I was still using beta 0.6 because it worked with my extensions and was stable under extreme usage patterns.

    So... any chance for implementing

  • Web Developer (Score:3, Informative)

    by Z0mb1eman (629653) on Friday March 03 2006, @08:50AM (#14842048) Homepage
    Glad to see Web Developer [mozilla.org] at the top of the list... it is, IMO, by far the most useful Firefox plugin out there. I've been using it at work for a few months, and even got a few co-workers to install Firefox specifically because they wanted to use this plugin...

    Just one datapoint, but it reinforces in my mind how important plugins (they're plugins, dammit! why are they pushing the term "extension"!) are to Firefox's success. Which, I guess, was the whole point of this contest.
  • It appears that "best" means "of practical use to as few people as possible".
  • Okay, does the plush toy [mozilla.org] they're giving away look more like a fox [wikipedia.org] or a racoon [wikipedia.org]?

  • Firefox extensions I can't live without (Score:3, Interesting)

    by peter8888 (958690) on Friday March 03 2006, @09:56AM (#14842421)
    These are the Firefox extensions I can't live without

    GooglePreview:
    https://addons.mozilla.org/extensions/moreinfo.php ?id=189 [mozilla.org]

    Venkman Javascript Debugger (for 1.5):
    http://getahead.ltd.uk/ajax/venkman [getahead.ltd.uk]

    Live HTTP Headers:
    http://livehttpheaders.mozdev.org/ [mozdev.org]

    Peter
  • Just tried reading about Reveal [mozilla.org] from Galeon 2.0.1. The mozilla site says

    Incompatible Extension or Extension No Longer Available

    . Apparently, the Mozilla addon site keys off the HTTP_USER_AGENT, and modifies the results accordingly. Except that if your goal is to persuade other people to switch your browser, or at least inform them about it, shouldn't you let users of other browsers at least read about its features?

    FWIW, if I use the search function (searching in extensions) from Galeon, the results returned

      • I actually find NoScript better than Adblock since most ads are generated using javascript I don't have to think about blocking the ads on a new page since they are already blocked (javascript not executed).

        Still one needs Adblock for hard-coded ads, but with NoScript a lot of adblocking is prevented (and the browser becomes more secure).
        • AdBlock can block scripts too. In fact AdBlock can block almost anything: images, iframes, embeds, objects, etc.

          Not all people are that good with HTML/Web terminology: AdBlock unfortunately use lots of it. It's okay for me. But my friend e.g. has whole bunch of extensions (a-la FlashBlock, NoScript) which in fact do what I do with AdBlock alone.

          • Re:If only... (Score:4, Informative)

            by Lispy (136512) on Friday March 03 2006, @09:58AM (#14842435) Homepage
            Hey, you probably know that, but there is a well maintained, autoupdated set of rules for almost all Ads out there.
            It's called Filterset G [mozilla.org].
            This in addition to Adblock plus keeps all ads out of sight without having to configure a single thing. No worries. :)

            I highly recommend it to anyone and it's part of my default install for friends...
            • I've tried it at home but found that I consider to be ads much broader range of content...

              And not everyone knows about the filtersets. And it's very accustomized to U.S. providers. E.g. I see quite much ads on German and Russians sites. And with filtersets installed, adding another rule is bit more difficult than with plain AdBlock.

              Anyway, I use AdBlock for quite some time and my rule set is *very* long and kills *all* what *I* consider ad, not some other guys.

          • Not entirely true though. I use NoScript to block in-html javascript on sites.

            I've also extended my own version of AdBlock to incorporate a new feature which I named relative-to-site blocking: you define what the "site" is with a regexp, a few special modifiers and filter non-matching content from it with a regexp. For example, the following rule:

            ##\dom##.*

            Would block all content which is not coming from the domain currently in the status bar, so if you're surfing example.com images and javascript lin
    • I actually don't use adblock. What I do use is flashblock. This cuts out 95% of the annoying ads. I don't mind seeing ads as long as they aren't really annoying and intrusive. I think Noscript would be nice too, for those really annoying ones that show up and move around over the content you are viewing. But I don't use it because there are enough sites out there that need javascript to function correctly, such that it would be annoying to have to enable it for every new site I went to. The thing tha

      • Exactly; if you want ad agencies to "get your message", try to actually block the ads you find annoying instead of blocking _all_ ads... if flash/dhtml ads get less and less views compared to "normal" banners, they will get the message...

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the Poster. The Rest © 1997-2009 Geeknet, Inc.