On The BBC 2.0 132
novus ordo writes "BBC has been exploring the 'Web 2.0' approach in its future plans 'to keep the BBC relevant in the digital age.' They have also put an experimental catalogue online. 'This will allow you to find out about any of the one million programmes that the BBC holds in its archive, going right back to 1937. It's a window onto an amazing cultural and national resource.' They have also opened up a competition to completely redesign its home page."
great resource, but incomplete (Score:2, Funny)
blake's 7
No search results found for
q
No search results found for
crystal tips and alistair
etc.
But hey, they have a great disclaimer
The catalogue is not comprehensive. It does not contain an entry for every programme broadcast by the BBC on TV and Radio since the 1920s. The main exclusions are sport, feature films, other non-BBC copyright programmes (e.g. TV series imported from the USA), some regional programming and programmes which do not exist.
Re:great resource, but incomplete (Score:1)
Re:great resource, but incomplete (Score:2)
I guess their search engine need some more work.
Re:great resource, but incomplete (Score:3)
As other parts of the BBC correctly tell you
http://www.bbc.co.uk/cult/classic/blakes7/ [bbc.co.uk]
Re:great resource, but incomplete (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:great resource, but incomplete (Score:1)
Re:great resource, but incomplete (Score:1)
http://open.bbc.co.uk/catalogue/infax/search/Q9 [bbc.co.uk]
Re:great resource, but incomplete (Score:4, Informative)
This notice is because some programs (such as Dad's Army) have had tapes written over/destroyed because of previous BBC policy.
Re:great resource, but incomplete (Score:2)
No search results found for crystal tips and alistair
Try "Crystal Tipps"
try 'sex' (Score:1)
redirecting you => sex+porn
redirecting you => porn
redirecting you => hitler
i think they either designed it that way or there is some good hitler porn out there! either way, please share.
Re:try 'sex' (Score:1)
competition rules (Score:5, Funny)
The catch is that they want it to have the same color scheme, font, icons, and certain design elements from the Slashdot home page.
Re:competition rules (Score:1)
Xmltv of tv and radio programmes (Score:1, Insightful)
Re:Xmltv of tv and radio programmes (Score:2, Informative)
See here [dave.org.uk] for more details.
Re:Xmltv of tv and radio programmes (Score:5, Informative)
7 Day Listings [bbc.co.uk]
There's also the RadioListings web site (Score:3, Informative)
I take the data the BBC (and other stations) list, edit it it for readability, and include things like series and episode numbers - things that are essential for any collectors.
Yes, this is a blatent plug for my site.
Re:There's also the RadioListings web site (Score:1)
Re:There's also the RadioListings web site (Score:2)
is there a copyright issue with what you are doing?
The BBC's Website (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:The BBC's Website (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:The BBC's Website (Score:2)
Re:The BBC's Website (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:The BBC's Website (Score:2, Interesting)
But then, I see very little reason to make windows take up the whole screen.... I usually have 2 or 3 that i'm watching in the background and I want some of them visible.
This is why static sized pages of any sort suck. Fix a narrow column or two, let the browser size the rest based on how much is left. It's not that hard.
Re:The BBC's Website (Score:1)
Re:The BBC's Website (Score:2)
Re:The BBC's Website (Score:2)
He said "utilizes all of the screen space available in a browser window". He didn't say "utilizes an area larger than 800x600". Web design isn't like print media, it can (and by default does) dynamically reflow into whatever space is available when the web designers don't intentionally stop it from doing so.
So if a visitor has a small screen, that's not a problem, and visitors with large screens (or in this case, average-sized screens) can act
Re:The BBC's Website (Score:2)
Well, if you set a max-width property, aren't people still going to complain if their resolution width is higher than the max-width?
The problem with autoresizing layouts is that you lose a lot of editorial control over content layout. For pages that are just straight-forward single-article documents, this isn't much of a problem. However, most home pages of large, content-rich sites follow a magazine/newspaper-frontpage layout. So the content is divided up into several columns and panels with custom graphi
Re:The BBC's Website (Score:2)
Possibly true for dense print, but looking at some books on my desk we have
And Im sure Ive seen data that shows putting text into newspaper-style columns reduces comprehension, but cant find a reference.
And people who quote this, possibly mythical, eyeball flyback effect seem to completely miss the effect
Re:The BBC's Website (Score:1)
They don't print books on cash register paper, so why make every website on that? It's not like I'm saying make it 1200x1600 default.
Re:The BBC's Website (Score:2, Interesting)
BBC on /.'s revamp? (Score:5, Informative)
An interesting point from the BBC "Reboot [bbc.co.uk]" Q&A considering /.'s recent webpage redesign contest:
Online archive (Score:5, Informative)
It's available here : http://www.ina.fr/archivespourtous/index.php [www.ina.fr]
In Sweden as well... (Score:5, Informative)
A small(ish) selection of the historical archives is available, and shows are available online up to a week after having been aired - but the plan is that one day all of the archives will be indexed and digitized and viewable over the intarweb. There's also rumors that this will be completely free for everyone who lives in the country and pays the state-imposed TV-license.
Re:In Sweden as well... (Score:1, Insightful)
You know, I'm American, I'm not 'Anglosaxon', and I can speak English pretty well. I know its hard to realize when you live in almost-lilywhite Sweden, but race does not correlate to language.
Or maybe you were just playing to the Euro Slashdot audience that thinks its cute to talk about le anglo saxon and their ghastly language. It'll be pretty freaking funny when these guys get the memo that more people speak English in Asia
I looked for the Churchill speech (Score:1, Redundant)
Re:I looked for the Churchill speech (Score:3, Informative)
Re:I looked for the Churchill speech (Score:2)
Re:I looked for the Churchill speech (Score:2)
I suppose stuff like the iMP [bbc.co.uk] could have archive programming however, but there may be rights issues preventing stuff to appear, plus putting the entire archive online would probably be rather unfeasible from a time and money perspective.
I think the BBC is also supposed to make money from stuff like DVDs as well. It's all rather confusing and co
Re:I looked for the Churchill speech (Score:2)
Re:I looked for the Churchill speech (Score:2)
Re:I looked for the Churchill speech (Score:2)
Web 2.0 (Score:1)
It seems that, if BBC's web designers are to be believed, "Web 2.0" really just means "make all your fonts huge".
From a big fan of the current bbc.co.uk [bbc.co.uk].The Computer Programme (Score:1)
Re:The Computer Programme (Score:1)
Javascript... (Score:1, Funny)
0/10 (Score:2)
('Spose I could try Angus Prune as well
bbc 2.0 = snookr snookr snookr (Score:3, Funny)
yes, its the world championship snooker at the moment, so BBC2 stops everything for green baize action...
Re:bbc 2.0 = snookr snookr snookr (Score:2)
AICMFP
Or I could be mistaken.
Re:Staying Relevant (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Staying Relevant (Score:4, Informative)
You meant "left wing" (prob. a typo), other than that this remark is true all over europe. In most european countries, Democrats would well be the right wing and Republicans would be the far right.
Re:Staying Relevant (Score:1)
Re:Staying Relevant (Score:2)
Republicans would be the far right
I think much of Europe sees the Republicans as even further right than that..
Re:Staying Relevant (Score:2)
More than most of Europe, most of the world.
Re:Staying Relevant (Score:3, Insightful)
Who cares about your right-wing-american-nutjob sensibilities? BBC is not even left wing by european standards, and 5 billion people are anti-americans.
Re:Staying Relevant (Score:3, Funny)
Why that's. .
KFG
Re:Staying Relevant (Score:1)
That's rather amazing, there isn't even 300,000,000 people in the US yet 5 BILLION people are anti-americans, do you mean 5 billion hate america or do you mean that there are 5 billion people that are anti-american (aka, Americans that hate america)? cause that's some funky math going on there.
simple math? (Score:2, Interesting)
5B = earth_population - Golden Billion [wikipedia.org]
I have no comments on the reasons for this.
Re:Staying Relevant (Score:3, Insightful)
Anti-American means they don't like you. And there are more people in the world than just those living in the US.
Moderation Abuse (Score:1, Insightful)
Obviously, name-calling is only acceptable when you do it to conservatives. The moderation buse is too glaring in this case.
Re:Moderation Abuse (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Staying Relevant (Score:2)
if you dont feel like clicking the link, here is he meat:
THE BBC Governors have upheld a complaint against a radio reporter who wept as dying Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat departed the West Bank.
The corporation's head of editorial com
Re:Staying Relevant (Score:1)
Re:Staying Relevant (Score:2)
Considering palestine has never been a country he must not have been much of a leader. The west bank was part of jordan before israel invaded (you wont read that in the media) and "Palestinians" are just ordinary arabs.
Re:Staying Relevant (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Staying Relevant (Score:3, Insightful)
Being pro-Palestine or simply against Israeli occupation doesn't make one 'anti-semitic'. Even ignoring the fact that Arabs are also semites, there are Jews (and even Israeli Jews) who are also against the occupation. Opposing Zionism and the state of Israel does not mean one hates Jews. In fact, the only reason Israel was established was because the British and U.S. government didn't want an influx of Jewish refugees after WWII. So the creation of the state of Israel is more anti-semetic than opposing its
Re:Staying Relevant (Score:1)
If Europe is "left-wing"... then it wouldn't really seem left-wing to them, would it?
Re:Staying Relevant (Score:2)
That's why he said "by european standards." Unlike, you, the GP understands that 'left-wing' and 'right-wing' are subjective terms that can only be used in relative comparisons. Calling Europe 'left-wing' is just stating that they are 'left-wing' by your standards--by their standards, you would also be 'right-wing' then.
Are perhaps you think that your point of view is the universally centrist point of view which all political attitudes should be measured against?
Let's feed the trolls! (Score:2)
Let's see... the U.S. got involved in WW1 because they were helping Europe out? Ah, no, they did so because those silly Germans used their U-boats to sink and seize U.S. commercial ships. Before that, the U.S. tried to stay the hell out of it.
Well then... the U.S. got involved in WW2 because they were helping Europe out? Ah, no, they did so because those silly Japanese bombed Pearl Harbor. Before that, the U.S. tried to stay the hell out of it.
Re:Let's feed the trolls! (Score:2)
"Bob Spink: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer (1) what outstanding liabilities there are to the United Kingdom of lend-lease loan facilities arranged during the Second World War; [38441]..."
"Ruth Kelly: The information is as follows."...
"Under the Agreement the loans would be repaid in 50 annual instalments commencing in 1950. However the Agreement allowed deferral of annual p
Re:Staying Relevant (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Staying Relevant (Score:2)
Re:Staying Relevant (Score:2)
Re:Staying Relevant (Score:2)
Re:Staying Relevant (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Staying Relevant (Score:4, Interesting)
I think Fox needs to first get rid its right wing, anti-Europe bias if it wants to be relevant in the digital age. That would be the first thing that needs to be changed.
In this age of left-leaning blogs that can monitor Fox's biases, people will realize how much of an agenda they have.
Re:Staying Relevant (Score:2, Insightful)
Slashdot staying Relevant? (Score:1)
Re:Staying Relevant (Score:4, Insightful)
I've never seen anyone accuse the BBC of anti-american bias before; probably because the idea is so incredibly stupid. The only real case of a reasonable case for poor quality reporting in the past two decades was "Campbell Dossier", and this wasn't related to America in any real sense.
If there really was any real accusation of anti-american bias, there would have been some kind of report or media discussion. There hasn't been; you're just sounding off because you don't like the coverage.
Re:Staying Relevant (Score:1)
I suppose. Now where's those (reputable) reports and media discussions about Fox News? You know, the network that doesn't do "factual reporting?"
Re:Staying Relevant (Score:1)
BBC Bias is certainly a very talked about issue. [google.co.uk]
6 million sites can't be wrong!
Re:Staying Relevant (Score:4, Insightful)
Oh and then there's the Sun, owned by one of the BBC's competitiors (Sky), that just complains because their boss tells them to.
Re:Staying Relevant (Score:2)
There probably would be bias if some group wasn't complaining about bias.
Re:Staying Relevant (Score:2)
But let's be honest, google hits don't mean shit. There is no issue of BBC bias.
Re:Staying Relevant (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Staying Relevant (Score:3, Insightful)
Rubbish.
Firstly, you're trolling. "you have to be right-wing in order to be relevant" ? WTF, get a life, go back under that bridge, troll, etc.
Secondly, the BBC is paid for by the citizens on the UK via the TV licence tax. It is not even directly controlled or financed by the UK government via tax budgets, but via the licence fee. If Americans don't like what it says, that is largely thier proble
Re:huh? (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:huh? (Score:3, Informative)
So install Real Alternative [codecguide.com] instead.
Re:huh? (Score:2)
who'd install `real crap` on their unix machine anyway ?
i'd like bbc on my pc, i could even pay the bbc the 'tv tax' to watch it outside the uk. they have a nice program and they have more independent news than the channels that start with F or C.
gl bbc
Re:huh? (Score:5, Informative)
Given the quality of RealPlayer for Linux (basically just HelixPlayer packaged with proprietary codecs) I certainly would. I seen the Windows RealPlayer, so I certainly understand your reservations... but HelixPlayer and RealPlayer are remarkably simple clean multimedia players. Well worth the effort.
Jedidiah.
Re:huh? (Score:1)
All other options, for embedded 'real' format content, seem to have issues of one sort or another.
Realplayer for linux just works.
Re:huh? (Score:1)
IMO the Beeb has always been slightly pro-government (whoever was in power at the time) after all the BBC does have a charter that is up for renewal soon http://www.bbc.co.uk/thefuture/charter/charter.sht ml [bbc.co.uk]. So the BBC will always lean, albeit only slightly, towards those wh
Very cool, actually! (Score:2)
Actually, it'll probably help me understand quite a few of the pop culture jokes in Vicar [imdb.com] of Dibley [bbc.co.uk].
Re:Is it Just me.... (Score:1)
Re:Is it Just me.... (Score:3, Informative)
You know the BBC is not a standard US 'for-profit' corporate - right?
Check out their 'about us' [bbc.co.uk] stuff.
Re:Is it Just me.... (Score:2)
Re:Is it Just me.... (Score:2, Informative)
Probably the biggest benefit is that lack of adverts - it also helps in keeping the other channels amount of ADs down too.
The best programmes (shows) that come out of the BBC have to be their natural history and documentaries - some of the National Geographic stuff is in this calibre I must admit. I don't hold the Beeb up on a pedestal though, but consider the standard to be perhaps a little higher
Re:Is it Just me.... (Score:1)
Re:Is it Just me.... (Score:3, Informative)
Its becoming more and more common for legitimate companies to start a "competition" for one thing or another, its one thing for an FOSS project to hold these competitions or events, but for a "for profit" to hold these competitions seems like either lazyiness (their web developer doesn't want to) or incompetitance (their web developer isn't able to) I mean, honestly, just hire someone to do it
No, it's what we like to call "just a marketing gimmick". In fact, they even address any "ripping off" or "freeloadi
Next time, read the rules first (Score:2)