Slashdot Log In
Interview With Author of the First Spoof Language
Posted by
Soulskill
on Fri Jul 04, 2008 06:43 PM
from the spoof-language-real-beard dept.
from the spoof-language-real-beard dept.
An anonymous reader brings us Computerworld's interview with Don Woods, one of the creators of Compiler Language With No Pronounceable Acronym (INTERCAL). INTERCAL and its documentation were created in 1972 as a parody of that era's languages and instruction manuals. Among other things, Woods had this to say:
"We designed the language without too much trouble. Writing the manual took a while, especially for things like the circuit diagrams we included as nonsensical illustrations. The compiler itself actually wasn't too much trouble, given that we weren't at all concerned with optimising the performance of either the compiler or the compiled code. I admit I'm surprised at its longevity. Some of the jokes in the original work feel rather dated at this point. It helps that the language provides a place where people can discuss oddball features missing from other languages, such as the 'COME FROM' statement and operators that work in base 3."
Related Stories
Submission: First spoof language (INTERCAL) author reveals all by Anonymous Coward
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
Full
Abbreviated
Hidden
Loading... please wait.
Bah! (Score:5, Funny)
Intercal has nothing on Brainfuck [wikipedia.org]. Brainfuck makes every other spoof programming language look like a joke. I'd write the Hello World! program here, but Slashdot's content filter doesn't support Brainfuck code.
Re:Bah! (Score:5, Funny)
It's a language created on the Amiga in the 1980s, named after hypercard, but completely unrelated. The only legal characters are whitespace. Tab, space, linefeed, carriage return etc.
Parent
Re:Bah! (Score:5, Informative)
Here is the link:
http://esoteric.voxelperfect.net/wiki/Malbolge [voxelperfect.net]
Parent
Re:Bah! (Score:5, Informative)
How did you guys miss Whitespace? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whitespace_(programming_language) [wikipedia.org]
Parent
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Is there no end to his evil meddling
Re:Bah! (Score:5, Funny)
Your suggestion is laughable. There is only one acceptable answer [wikipedia.org].
Parent
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Bah! (Score:5, Funny)
I would post "Hello World" written in it here, but the comment thingy refused to accept it: "Filter error: Please use less whitespace."
tm
Parent
Re:Bah! (Score:5, Funny)
The language you refer to is whitespace, as described and linked in a comment below as well.
I would post "Hello World" written in it here, but the comment thingy refused to accept it: "Filter error: Please use less whitespace."
So those Perl bigots at Slashdot are finally actively excluding other programming languages by name.
Parent
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Bah! (Score:5, Informative)
Most people entirely miss the point of Brainfuck. It was never meant to be esoteric for the sake of it, or to "challenge and amuse programmers" as Wikipedia puts it.
It was designed to create a compiler as small as possible. The original AmigaOS compiler was 240 bytes in size. Even smaller compilers have been created by people who truly grasped the spirit of the language.
Parent
P ' ' (Score:5, Informative)
Most people entirely miss the point of Brainfuck. It was never meant to be esoteric for the sake of it, or to "challenge and amuse programmers" as Wikipedia puts it.
It was designed to create a compiler as small as possible.
That, and Brainfuck is a realization of P ' ' [wikipedia.org], the first imperative structured programming language ever to be proved Turing complete.
Parent
Re: (Score:2)
It is, but whether this is intentional or accidental is unclear. The original documentation, what little there is of it, makes no mention of this.
Re: (Score:2)
Then somebody else writes the truth further down in the article, and then nobody bothers to edit the article to make it actually consistent with itself.
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Intercal has nothing on Brainfuck [wikipedia.org]. Brainfuck makes every other spoof programming language look like a joke.
Not sure whether that was intentionally humourous or not, but well done, nonetheless.
But seriously[*] kids, nothing holds a candle to ACME [cpan.org]. All the programming foolishness you'll ever need, implemented in glorious Perl!
--------
[*] Whatever....
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Nonsense. Brainfuck is just a complicated but still pretty direct way of describing a Turing Machine. Brainfuck is interpreted in a single direction and the code is static. Intercal lets you use COME FROM statements (act like goto except you jump from the label to this line, in threaded intercal you can have multiple COME FROMs for one label and each spawns a thread), has ABSTAIN FROM that deactivates certain commands at runtime until reenabled, expects you to say PLEASE every so often (or it rejects your c
Go watch some fireworks... (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah you'd think Slashdot would report on economic issues, high oil and gas prices, or how the government and our employers are spying on us, using technology for each of them.
Instead they report on a Spoof language and it isn't even April Fools day yet, OMG ponies!
I suppose next they'll report on how some company is still using COBOL on an IBM 360 Mainframe to write up reports and someone ported Java to the IBM 360 Mainframe to serve those reports as PDF files using Jasper reports? Or maybe they will write
In other news... (Score:5, Funny)
Microsoft announces new language for the .NET platform, IronINTERCAL.
With all the features of regular INTERCAL, but only runs on Windows Vista (tm).
Miguel De Icaza had this to say about the exciting new development - "No Me Gusta." He's clearly speechless about this fabulous new language available only on Windows Vista (tm).
Re:In other news... (Score:4, Funny)
A crucial feature of this mock-sports extravaganza will be on-the-fly and occasionally randomized rules generation.
Lead developer Q. Wolfgang Imboodaga denied vehemently the accusation that this is really a DARPA project to write a US Congress simulator.
Parent
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
The first IronINTERCAL project announced will be a MMOG version of a 43-Man Squeamish league.
Fail. The game was 43-Man Squamish.
I still remember the invocation of the coin toss: "Mi Tio esta Infermo pero la Carretera esta Verde!*" (Portugese grammar corrected for me by Giglermo Regades, an Argentinian auto mechanic of my acquaintance in 1966.
(*"My uncle is sick but the highway is green.")
Re: (Score:2)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/43-Man_Squamish [wikipedia.org]
Does this mean I don't get my pony?
COME FROM revival (Score:5, Interesting)
If you hunker down and squint at it the right way, COME FROM is really an early form of aspect oriented programming - non local transfer of control to the point of definition - yeah, yeah CLOS fans we know that real generic functions subsume AOP and date from the mists of the 80s - but this is from the early 70s so it is pretty interesting. Over application of hyped technologies for the win!
A widely accepted use of COME FROM (Score:5, Insightful)
If you hunker down and squint at it the right way, COME FROM is really an early form of aspect oriented programming
Even before the alleged fad that is AOP, processors have had hardware support for COME FROM for a long time. It's called a breakpoint [wikipedia.org].
Parent
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Not the same thing (Score:2)
As an assembly programmer, I find it not even vaguely similar, at least in spirit and purpose.
A breakpoint is essentially a one-byte CALL. No more.
It's used by debuggers as a makeshift COME FROM, yes, but there's no way to use it in assembly code as an invisible COME FROM. (Except if you do self-modifying code, but then in that case you can do anything whatsoever, not just COME FROM.) If you actually wrote that instruction in an assembly program, it would work as a CALL, and it would be visible right there,
Idle dream (Score:2)
The SPITBOL interpreter is available under the GPL, and a turnkey version of the OS it ran under is available. One of these days, if we can ever turn up a copy of the original INTERCAL compiler, I want to turn out an ISO image that's an IPLable, running OS and tools to run INTERCAL under Hercules...
LOLCODE (Score:4, Funny)
LOLCODE [lolcode.com] might actually get this brain-damaged BASIC refugee trying their hand at programming again after all these years.
Re:LOLCODE (Score:5, Funny)
Parent
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
duh, man, that's like, the whole... point, or whatever, man.
Proof that otherwise intelligent people, in groups, become absolute fucktards.
Re:LOLCODE (Score:5, Funny)
u is in our threadz
missin teh point
Parent
I wish I could remember .... (Score:2, Funny)
Back in the 1970s somebody told me about an operating system. I can only remember a couple of statements:
KILL SUPERVISOR
JUMP SECRETARY
Re:I wish I could remember .... (Score:4, Funny)
New Day
Read Newspaper
Job Sucks
Kill Supervisor
Open Fly
Do Secretary
Close Door
Go Home
Parent
What? A spoof? (Score:2)
Better spoof languages (Score:5, Funny)
it's apparently amateur night (Score:5, Funny)
Oh please.
Has noone here ever used perl? :)
Re: (Score:2)
Not according to my company's HR department. A few weeks ago they put out a job posting for a "Pearl" developer...
Turn over the Google Source Code to Viacom in INTE (Score:5, Funny)
The Apple Version (Score:4, Funny)
Special hardware support for INTERCAL! (Score:4, Interesting)
Real Challenge... (Score:4, Interesting)
How about instead of the Obfuscated C Code contest, we have an Unobfuscated INTERCAL Code contest where the object is to make INTERCAL code look as close to or at least as understandable as "normal" C (or other language) as possible while still performing a set action?
Woah! (Score:5, Funny)
Wow! Researching these esoteric programming languages has been more than a brainfuck [esolangs.org] - it is positively a brainfuck++ [esolangs.org]. Nay, I'm sure just reading of them is causing an irreversible [esolangs.org] loss of knowledge of real programming languages - that must surely qualify as a quantum brainfuck [esolangs.org] whereby both cannot be fully comprehended [esolangs.org] at the same time.
Man, now I really feel like a dumbf*ck [esolangs.org]! Fuck, Fuck! [esolangs.org] Double fuck! [esolangs.org]
The bad news is that my pointy [esolangs.org] haired boss [esolangs.org] has ordered that all development switch to his new favorite language [esolangs.org]. I think he may have been smoking something [esolangs.org].
This is bad for me because he has now had to ask me to go ahead and come in on Saturday. This means I will have to cancel my date, who has real come hither [esolangs.org] eyes, and I was so confident it was going to be a real beneficial [esolangs.org][0] night[1].
Argh! [esolangs.org]
I wish I could get all my ducks in a row [esolangs.org] so I could give him a swift kick with my size nines [esolangs.org] so he walks funny [esolangs.org] for a week, flick him the V [esolangs.org] and leave this crummy company; that would rock [esolangs.org]!
[0] High five!
[1] Unlike the last one, on which the lady gave me an unexpected present [esolangs.org].
Putridos (Score:3, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
Now THIS gets me thinking ... (Score:2, Interesting)
Languages as we know them have well-known paradigms such as functional decomposition, object orientation, casts, blah blah. And we're limited to these ways of thinking, useful as they are.
But to invent a parody language which doesn't really have to be useful ... could produce ideas we wouldn't have thought of along traditional lines.
Anyone who reads Edward de Bono (who teaches thinking skills including how to have creative ideas) knows about the 'provocation': you make some nonsensical statement about
Object Oriented PostScript programming (Score:2)
Speaking of obscure programming languages: I used to work with Don Woods at Sun Microsystems, where we wrote a user interface toolkit in object oriented PostScript. (TNT: The NeWS Toolkit -- for the James Gosling's Network extensible Windows System [wikipedia.org].)
-Don
If they're talking to Grace Murray Hopper (Score:2)