Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

Why Programming Rituals Work

Posted by ScuttleMonkey on Mon May 18, 2009 03:41 PM
from the still-waiting-for-the-stars-to-align-to-write-my-super-code dept.
narramissic writes "Programmers may not think that their rituals are unusual, but if you swear that your code is less buggy if you recite it aloud or you prepare for coding by listening to certain music, don't be surprised if you get a couple sideways glances. In a recent ITworld article, Issac Kelly, Lead Developer at Servee.com, explains his routine and why it works: 'To me, programming is really the 'last mile' to getting something done. When I do the planning and specifications, I go on lots of walks, take lots of time with my wife, and really do as little work in front of the computer as possible. The more I plan (in my head, on paper, on a whiteboard) the less I program; and all of my rituals are to that end.' His ritual goes like this: 'Before sitting down to a coding session, he gets a big glass of water, takes everything off of his desk, and closes out all programs and e-mail, keeping open only his code editor. The office door is shut, and some sort of music is playing ('typically an instrumental only, like my 'Explosions in the Sky' pandora station,' says Kelly).'"
+ -
story

Related Stories

[+] Finding a Personal Coding Trifecta 188 comments
jammag writes "For Seinfeld's George Constanza, his dream of the ideal moment was having sex while watching TV and eating a pastrami sandwich. He called this Nirvana state 'The Trifecta.' Developer Eric Spiegel adapts this concept of Nirvana to the act of writing your best possible code. He examines all (or most) of the possible things that might contribute to the 'The Trifecta' for developers — food, beverages, time of day. Spiegel also describes his personal Trifecta."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
  • by SerpentMage (13390) <ChristianHGross@NOspam.yahoo.ca> on Monday May 18 2009, @03:43PM (#28002713)

    Before I undertake any task I do absolutely nothing. For about a day I will just idle around thinking about the problem. Kicking around one solution and another.... And I keep doing this until I am happy...

    • by microbee (682094) on Monday May 18 2009, @03:46PM (#28002785)

      Yes, sometimes I fall asleep on the toilet when I do this.

    • by MyLongNickName (822545) on Monday May 18 2009, @03:47PM (#28002825) Journal

      You *think* before you code? WEIRDO!

      In all seriousness, when I worked for a bank, I would go outside with a legal pad and start drawing out the logic in terms of pictures. Away from the phone. Away from the co-workers.

      At lunch one time, a coworker half jokingly said I only work 3 hours a day. My manager was there and remarked "Yeah, but he gets more done in those three hours than you do all day".

      I tried to keep from smiling... however, in all seriousness, coding is 30% of programming. too many coders consider themselves programmers.

      • by Mr2cents (323101) on Monday May 18 2009, @04:12PM (#28003237)

        You should seriously consider giving your manager a raise.

      • You can run just as hard and fast as you like. Doesn't do you much good if it's in the wrong direction.

         

      • by moderatorrater (1095745) on Monday May 18 2009, @04:53PM (#28003733)

        I tried to keep from smiling... however, in all seriousness, coding is 30% of programming. too many coders consider themselves programmers.

        A lot depends on deadlines. If you have 3 things that needs to be done and committed by tomorrow, then there's going to be a tendency towards hackery. If you've got one thing that the company wants you to work on until it's finished, then you need to be more of a thinker. Programming's all about tradeoffs, and deciding which tradeoff happens isn't always the responsibility of the coder.

        Of course, most of the time management doesn't even realize that a tradeoff is being made. There's a breakdown in communication somewhere and most managers don't even realize that by pushing the deadline to be shorter they're asking for more work in the future and more bugs.

        • by luder (923306) * <slashdotNO@SPAMlbras.net> on Monday May 18 2009, @07:36PM (#28005429)

          If you have 3 things that needs to be done and committed by tomorrow, then there's going to be a tendency towards hackery. If you've got one thing that the company wants you to work on until it's finished, then you need to be more of a thinker.

          I bet Duke Nukem Forever team members are all philosophers, by now...

      • by 16K Ram Pack (690082) <tim,almond&gmail,com> on Monday May 18 2009, @05:20PM (#28004047) Homepage

        It's one reason I prefer to charge clients for the job than the hour. Because like the author, by the time I sit down to code, I've worked out precisely what I want to do. When I'm writing code in the evening, I might be reading slashdot, twitter and all that, but I'm quite frequently also buzzing code around in my head. I can almost feel the things forming, juggling around 2 different approaches and letting the brain work out which way it likes better.

        It means that when I sit down, the code is more like typing.

        • by Sanat (702) on Monday May 18 2009, @07:48PM (#28005549)

          A master does nothing, but leaves nothing undone. All of the work is done by not doing.

          Allowing your subconscious to design the modules instead of your conscious mind tends to lead towards more consistent results. Most individuals never reach this stage and probably can not relate to what you are describing.

          Others here know exactly what you are describing.

          • by micromuncher (171881) on Tuesday May 19 2009, @01:45AM (#28008045)

            Well...

            All the amazing solutions that I've had while asleep or in delerium have always seemed really good for the 30 minutes of furious waking coding... before the "What the f**k is this garbage? It will never work..." gets shouted out.

            My subconscious thinks this is hilarious.

    • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

      by LucidBeast (601749)
      I do the same with a twist... and then I drink my beer and code.
    • by jeko (179919) on Monday May 18 2009, @04:13PM (#28003247)

      Here's a couple of long out-of-fashion words; contemplation and reflection.

      There is no "process" -- not change requests, not planning documents, not maintenance windows, not design documents, and for damn sure no flavor-of-the-month buzzword -- that can replace someone with a brain thinking the problem through.

      The problem with this is that it exposes the MBAs for the empty suits they are. Our "business team" -- salesmen with glorified titles -- sit through every meeting bloviating while the engineers get it done. The PMP certs are the worst about it. Me and a customer engineer will put our heads together about something, and decide on a course of action. The PMPs will jump all over it and send out emails about "deliverable actions items."

      One of the other engineers will mention something, and we'll realize we should take a different approach. While we're getting real work done, the PMPs will barge in demanding to know if that action items has been deliverabled yet, and if not we need to reprioritize our skill sets.

      I used to try to explain it to them. We were going to do that, but then we found out this, so were doing something different. I kept getting haughty responses about how they didn't need to know the little tech stuff, they were just managing the project.

      One of them went on at huge length about how you didn't have to be a doctor to be a chief of staff at a hospital.

      At that point I just began to feel sorry for him. Can you imagine living your life hoping and praying that no one will ever realize that you don't have the first clue about what you're talking about?

  • AAAAAnd (Score:5, Funny)

    by Profane MuthaFucka (574406) <busheatskok@gmail.com> on Monday May 18 2009, @03:45PM (#28002763) Homepage Journal

    There's Slashdot. Even when I do everything else, Slashdot is the final work-preventer.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Monday May 18 2009, @03:45PM (#28002771)

          1. Make a cup of coffee: Community New Orleans blend, one sugar, hazelnut creamer.
          2. Read reddit.
          3. Check social status sites: facebook, twitter, etc.
          4. Read CNN.
          5. Read email.
          6. Catch up with coworkers.
          7. Juggle a bit.
          8. Put on headphones. Go to last.fm and hunt for a station that fits my current mood.
          9. Check reddit again.
        10. Go to lunch.
        11. Read email.
        12. Check reddit again.
        13. Update to-do list.
        14. Check icanhazcheezburger, etc.
        15. Pick different last.fm station.

  • If you distill any of the accepted processes down then you plan first, even in agile processes. To summarize the summary: If you plan first and clear your workspace of distractions you do better work...
  • by russotto (537200) on Monday May 18 2009, @03:48PM (#28002845) Journal

    ...when I make sure to release it when most of the testing group is on vacation. Vastly cuts down on the initial bug list, let me tell you.

    • Re: (Score:2, Insightful)

      I think the biggest problem with programming is the number of programmers involved and the size of the project. It's really the testing group/QA departments job to catch the bugs. I listen to music while i work, granted I install network hardware, but it makes the day go by faster and seems to be more productive than listening to the phone ring or staring at the wall for hours on end. I think that programmers are given too much crap. They may make coding errors, but they are human. Another set of eyes on a
  • by Mr2cents (323101) on Monday May 18 2009, @03:48PM (#28002847)

    The key to good software is contemplation. You can feel the social pressure at the workplace to be typing all the time, but it's wrong to give in. If they want someone who's banging on his keyboard all the time, let them hire a typist.

  • by Fantom42 (174630) on Monday May 18 2009, @03:49PM (#28002863)

    Sure, some of what the article talks about is a ritual, but the planning process isn't a ritual at all. Its a process. One that usually works pretty well, I must add. The less time you spend coding, the better your product is usually going to be. That said, knowing when to put down the whiteboard is sometimes important too.

  • by Black Art (3335) on Monday May 18 2009, @03:53PM (#28002917)

    I can fully understand using such rituals. It helps you get in the right head space for writing code. It gets you focused on the task and flush out all the other crap trying to get your attention.

    I have found that if I am not in the right frame of mind before starting, the code takes much longer or is just plain wrong. If I am in the right head space, the task is quick and done before you know it.

    • I agree 100%.

      I have found that if I am not in the right frame of mind before starting, the code takes much longer or is just plain wrong. If I am in the right head space, the task is quick and done before you know it.

      It's not just coding, either -- anything requiring concentration and analytical thought benefits from being in the right frame of mind.

      One of the tricks I learned from a former boss was to identify what gets me "in the mood", and then practice at streamlining the process until I could turn it

  • by blahplusplus (757119) on Monday May 18 2009, @03:55PM (#28002973)

    I think the problem with planning everything too much is that you can't hold all the details in your mind at once, and sometimes your planned approach is not as good as one you come up with later given some time to stew on it (doing nothing).

    I think programming is a very iterative process because it is symbolic and non-visual (i.e. not like building something with structures that are easily and intuitively able to grasp their structural and interconnected relationsihps)

  • Sweet, to see one of my fav bands mentioned on Slashdot of all places :-)

  • by eggfoolr (999317) on Monday May 18 2009, @04:01PM (#28003069)

    Crikey! That's just sensible work organisation. I guess if you find something that works and always do it that way you might call it a ritual. My ritual is to get in the car and go to work every morning... that way I can do, well you know... WORK!

  • I usually just stare at the code until it starts staring back; that's usually about when I realize that it's 6AM and I need to sleep.

  • I'm curious if other programmers like to code at night or any other particular times.

    • my best code seems to come at about 12-2am. much past 4 and my code sucks unless i'm really in the zone.

  • Close door (Score:5, Insightful)

    by ichthus (72442) on Monday May 18 2009, @04:18PM (#28003307) Homepage
    I write firmware for a living, and I WISH I had a door to close. Nothing is more annoying or infuriating on my job than when coworkers are loudly shooting the bull while I'm trying to read a datasheet and figure out register settings.

    "S.. TF.. U!"

    I can code with some noise in the room, but I need QUIET when I'm reading a tech spec. I wish I had the ability to mask external stimuli.
    • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

      Wear Gun Muffs...

        • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

          by ajlitt (19055)

          I bought a pair of Etymotic ER6i IEM earphones four years ago and I still consider it one of the best purchases I've ever made. I got them originally so I could listen to my own music at the gym without having the stuff they play there bleed in. They worked so well that I now use them in my cube or occasionally in noisy environments like our lab.

  • WTF (Score:5, Funny)

    by Godji (957148) on Monday May 18 2009, @04:30PM (#28003449) Homepage
    he gets a big glass of water, takes everything off

    I stopped reading right there.
  • by hey! (33014) on Monday May 18 2009, @07:03PM (#28005137) Homepage Journal

    It's magic.

  • by ThousandStars (556222) on Monday May 18 2009, @07:13PM (#28005227) Homepage
    What he's really describing is how he gets away from distractions and puts himself in an environment conducive to working. Regarding the former, I wrote about and linked to many of the essays and some of the research dealing with distraction problems in this post [jseliger.com] and talk about some of my environmental cues, including equipment, in this one [jseliger.com].

    When you can prevent useless distractions, then you're really ready to go. Of course, I'm posting this on /., which shows me to be something of a hypocrite, but I think the point still a useful one.

  • Take a shower (Score:4, Interesting)

    by notthepainter (759494) <oblique@alum.mDEBIANit.edu minus distro> on Monday May 18 2009, @07:41PM (#28005475) Homepage

    I'm serious. I find that I solve many of my hardest problems in the shower. Now that I telecommute 100% of the time I'll often just take one, say in the middle of the afternoon, to jump start the solution!

    Obviously the shower has nothing to do with the situation, it is the "stepping back" that is important, so find something that works for you, and do it.

  • by Eudial (590661) on Tuesday May 19 2009, @02:48AM (#28008461)

    I prefer to work with intuitive models. My "ritual" is as follows:

    1. Ponder the problem. Not too hard. Just get a feel for how to solve it.
    2. Prototype a solution in some readable language (python?).
    3a. If the prototype is horribly broken, scrap it and go back to step 2.
    3b. Otherwise, create final solution from lessons learned from prototyping.

    A lot of people draw diagrams and flow charts and stuff. But that is stupid and too abstracted from the computer to be all that useful. By making a prototype, you're effectively making an interactive diagram/flowchart. It takes about the same time, and any problems will be immediately obvious.

    • I'm willing to bet that for all your talk of just getting to it you still do a lot of thinking about what you are coding, you just do it with the monitor in front of you. It's highly unlikely that you just sit done and start writing the final bug free version of the code. You must have some kind of thought process you use to solve your coding problems. If you don't you are either 1)doing it the hard way by writing first and fixing later 2) programing stuff that is so far beneath you that it's no real challe
    • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

      by DrLang21 (900992)
      I would like to know how complex of a system you are designing with this methodology. No flow planning? No predefined input/output? No figuring out how your design will efficiently fulfill software requirements? Planning isn't all about rituals, though it's well known that doing something to focus your thoughts helps get the juices flowing. Planning is about figuring out how to not waste your time or money, and being able to effectively divide out work if deadlines are pressing in.
    • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

      by khakipuce (625944)
      I agree, my first though when I read this was "what a ponce". We would all like more time, more flexibility and more peace and quiet, but transfer this guy's approach to say a Paramedic. There you are lying at the side of the road bleeding to death and the paramedic can't decide whay to do with out a whole heap of rituals. Planning, to a point, is obviously a good thing, but if you are a professional coder, cutting code is something you have done so often that you know the patterns, like the paramedic, you