Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

OpenOffice 3.1 Released

Posted by CmdrTaco on Thu May 07, 2009 12:09 PM
from the what-a-strange-topic-icon dept.
harmonise writes "OpenOffice 3.1 has been released. According to the release announcement, this update received 'The biggest single change (half a million lines of code!) and the most visible is the major revamp of OpenOffice.org on-screen graphics.' See the OpenOffice 3.1 New Features page for a full list of changes."
+ -
story

Related Stories

[+] Technology: OpenOffice UI Design Proposals Published 252 comments
An anonymous reader writes "Various members of the OpenOffice.org community have been submitting their first revisions of proposals to the OpenOffice.org Call for Design Proposals to redesign the user interface of Open Office. As part of Project Renaissance, attention is being drawn to the OpenOffice user interface, and it's 'user-friendliness.' Among the designs, is FLUX UI, which won an award at the Sun Microsystems Community Innovation Awards Program. Anyone can, and is encouraged, to check out the proposals (scroll to bottom of page) and leave your comments so that the designers can improve their designs for the final deadline for proposal submissions to the community."
[+] Technology: Preview the Office 2007 Ribbon-Like UI Floated For OpenOffice.Org 617 comments
recoiledsnake writes "OpenOffice.org has prototyped a new UI that radically changes the current OO.o interface into something very similar to the new ribbon style menus that Office 2007 introduced and which have been extensively used throughout Windows 7. The blog shows a screenshot of the prototype in Impress (the equivalent of PowerPoint), but this UI is proposed to be used across all OO.o applications. Some commenters on the Sun blog are not happy about OO.o blindly aping Office 2007, and feel that the ribbon UI may be out of place in non-Windows operating systems."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
  • by spud603 (832173) on Thursday May 07 2009, @12:11PM (#27862649)
    Finally with antialiasing !
      • Re:antialiased! (Score:5, Informative)

        by Anonymous Coward on Thursday May 07 2009, @12:26PM (#27862945)

        The new anti-aliasing feature is on the graphics (charts, etc). The text in writer has been anti-aliased for years, ass.

        • Re:antialiased! (Score:5, Insightful)

          by spud603 (832173) on Thursday May 07 2009, @01:09PM (#27863829)
          I think I got this thread off on the wrong foot. Text anti-aliasing has been around for a long time in OO.o (as a comment above says). In fact the new antialiasing is for the in-document drawings, which makes a huge difference both for working with images and for good-looking presentations.
          It actually is a big deal that they did this, and I congratulate the developers on their good work.
  • by levell (538346) * on Thursday May 07 2009, @12:13PM (#27862695) Homepage
    Fedora 11, which is due to be released in about 3 weeks [fedoraproject.org], will have OO3.1 [mirrorservice.org]
  • by Anonymous Coward on Thursday May 07 2009, @12:15PM (#27862723)

    and still no Clippy the paperclip to help me write a letter?

  • by zindorsky (710179) <zindorsky@gmail.com> on Thursday May 07 2009, @12:16PM (#27862743)

    Having a lot of lines of code is not necessarily something to brag about. In fact, it's more likely to be an indicator of badness than goodness.

    If the product works great, people won't care how many lines of code it has. If it's buggy or sluggish or in other ways wonky, people might look at the code line count and point to that as the problem. ("It's bloated!" "It's so big no one can understand it or fix it!")

    • by gurutc (613652) on Thursday May 07 2009, @12:25PM (#27862925)
      So far the product (update) does seem to work great. Better than the previous version. I use the Calc program a lot, and it seems faster on some basic functions like loading files with forumulas.
    • by jhfry (829244) on Thursday May 07 2009, @12:29PM (#27863015)

      Lots of lines of code CAN mean exactly what you say, bloat. However it appears that in this case many of the line changes were fixing issues and adding needed features.

      For example, they significantly reduced some bottlenecks in Calc... they made Base more like access in that you can actually create an "application"... and they added some very nice contextual help in places where non-power users will find it very handy, like when they are trying to use a Calc function and can't remember the order of its arguements.

      I would say that this is a decent point release for the OOorg team, evolutionary but not revolutionary. My only complaint is how much it is beginning to resemble MS Office; nice for adoption rates, bad for innovation.

  • Congratulations (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Abreu (173023) on Thursday May 07 2009, @12:17PM (#27862773)

    Screw the naysayers, congratulations to everybody working in OpenOffice.org

  • Improved looks? (Score:5, Insightful)

    by B5_geek (638928) on Thursday May 07 2009, @12:19PM (#27862813)

    I have heard for a long time how horrible OOo looked. Personally, I never understood what the problem was. The icons were clear and easy to dostinguosh between them, and the text-buttons were obvious.

    Compared to the newest version of MS Office, I'd say that any version of OOo wins hands down.

    • Re:Improved looks? (Score:4, Interesting)

      by MrEricSir (398214) on Thursday May 07 2009, @12:30PM (#27863025) Homepage

      Especially compared to MS Office 2007. It took me about 5 minutes just to figure out how to print something. I mean, it's an office program. There should either be a big PRINT button, or a File->Print menu.

      And ideally, a talking paperclip to help you stab your eyes out.

        • Re:Improved looks? (Score:5, Insightful)

          by mdielmann (514750) on Thursday May 07 2009, @01:04PM (#27863739) Homepage

          The point of icons and menus is so that you don't need to know cryptic keyboard commands. If the preferred solution to the updated icon system is to use the keyboard, they've failed. If the system is so changed that experienced Office users can't find the things they always did in the old version and there is no simple help for "how do I do x", they've failed. (It took me 30 minutes to just see the macro ribbon in Excel the first time. Now I just use Alt-F11 if it's not on the system I'm using.)
          Or to put it another way: The Ribbon system reminds me of the MacBook Wheel [theonion.com] - everything you want to do is just a few hundred clicks away.

      • by sjbe (173966) on Thursday May 07 2009, @12:55PM (#27863543)

        but it has had times where it seemed out of place on either Windows or OSX

        And that's exactly why iTunes has been such a success on Windows. It looks just like a native app...

      • it has had times where it seemed out of place on either Windows or OSX (particular OSX before it was a native application).

        I use NeoOffice [neooffice.org] on my Mac and see no reason to switch right now.

        when I'm using a program and I can tell it wasn't designed for the system I'm running it on, I count that as a problem.

        What matters to me is whether it is and how much it's usable. That's one reason I won't switch for now, NeoOffice is quite usable. Then again I hardly use it.

        Falcon

      • Re:Improved looks? (Score:4, Insightful)

        by Toonol (1057698) on Thursday May 07 2009, @03:14PM (#27866049)
        I don't mind the ribbons; the problem is the disparate mix of UI elements between Office and the rest of Windows. If something like ribbons was the new standard with Vista and Windows 7, it wouldn't be a problem. As it is, ribbons is the "special office 7" interface, which is as annoying as having a special interface for every media player. It adds little fraction-of-a-second pauses whenever you use the UI.
  • Word count (Score:5, Interesting)

    by simonwalton (843796) on Thursday May 07 2009, @12:22PM (#27862855)
    Does it offer the ability to have an auto-updating word count in the status bar yet? It's absolutely essential to many people, particularly copywriters who are paid to hit a particular word count. It seems like such a trivial thing to implement and has been requested many times.
    • Re:Word count (Score:5, Informative)

      by rs232 (849320) on Thursday May 07 2009, @12:33PM (#27863085)
      "Does it offer the ability to have an auto-updating word count in the status bar yet?"

      I don't know, but if you msg the developers I'm sure they would give it full attention. I see here that someone in 2006 [blogspot.com] wrote a Macro to perform such a task.
  • by AtomicDevice (926814) on Thursday May 07 2009, @12:23PM (#27862867)
    "OpenOffice.org now uses a technique called anti-aliasing..."

    WELCOME TO THE WORLD OF TOMORROW!!!!!!!
  • go-oo.org (Score:3, Informative)

    by Randle_Revar (229304) <kelly.clowers@gmail.com> on Thursday May 07 2009, @12:32PM (#27863071) Homepage Journal

    Personally, I am waiting for go-oo.org 3.1, as that is what goes into Debian, Ubuntu, SuSE, Gentoo and others.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Thursday May 07 2009, @12:33PM (#27863091)

    I get some weird "download chooser" page, and if I select MacOSX from there, it won't download either. This is with Safari 4.

    I think somebody is trying to be too "smart".

  • Well, Duh! (Score:5, Funny)

    by camperdave (969942) on Thursday May 07 2009, @12:33PM (#27863103) Journal
    ...the most visible is the major revamp of OpenOffice.org on-screen graphics.

    Well, Duh! I'll bet the least visible is the off screen graphics.
  • by 140Mandak262Jamuna (970587) on Thursday May 07 2009, @12:48PM (#27863375) Journal
    When it encounters a ODF 1.1 document with formula arguments separated by commas created by the MsOffice2007 SP2, does it throw up a really really big nasty warning dialog that says, "MsOffice2007 is using ODF 1.1, please contact the vendor and urge them to start supporting ODF 1.2. We will be nice this one last time and hack around the commas and make them colons. But best if you could persuade the vendor of ODF1.1 docs to upgrade to ODF 1.2"?
  • by cybereal (621599) on Thursday May 07 2009, @01:19PM (#27863981) Homepage

    So someone decided to run a code tidying tool and dared to check in the results I guess?

  • They still haven't fixed what I regard as the biggest bug in OO: the fact that file-opening and -saving dialogues default to the last directory it used rather than the current working directory when running on GNU/Linux. It is understandable that OO would use the MS Windows convention when running on MS Windows, but importing those conventions into Unix is a bad user-interface practice. There's a reason that Unix people move from directory to directory. For experienced Unix users who use different directories for different projects, the failure to track the current directory is very irritating.

    Even if they feel it necessary to provide the option of using the MS Windows conventions for people switching from MS Windows to Unix, it should be an option, not a requirement. And I doubt that this would be hard to do: determining the default directory for those dialogues is presumably only done in one or two places and should be very simple to code.

    • It uses themeable widgets so it only looks ugly if you whole desktop does.

      • by Tokerat (150341) on Thursday May 07 2009, @12:29PM (#27863005) Journal

        You had me until "Microsoft"...

      • by rs232 (849320) on Thursday May 07 2009, @12:36PM (#27863163)
        "OpenOrifice is still just a lame piece of software for people who are too cheap to buy quality Microsoft software

        Dancing Monkeyboy [google.com]
        • by labnet (457441) on Thursday May 07 2009, @04:09PM (#27867093)

          What a disturbing video.

          In fact it descibes Microsoft...
          1- The guy is incredibly unfit.
          2- His face had the alpha male 'kill' look. (rather than a 'excited, happy, proud' look)
          3- His actions looked like a gorilla defending its turf.
          4- His first words were slightly xenaphobic.

          now I understand the throwing chairs thing...

      • by Anonymous Coward on Thursday May 07 2009, @12:59PM (#27863645)

        OpenOrifice is still just a lame piece of software for people who are too cheap to buy quality Microsoft software.

        I didn't know Microsoft was in that business..

      • Re:Sorry but... (Score:5, Informative)

        by thedonger (1317951) on Thursday May 07 2009, @01:26PM (#27864109)

        MS Office/Excel won't open two files of the same name, and insists on only one working window, forcing the user to "split" in order to compare spreadsheets. OO Calc does both.

        OO Writer has a button for generating PDFs sans any Adobe integration.

        The advantage to MS Office is that your client is more than likely authoring documents on an MS Office product, and absolute compatibility is not assured. But I don't fault the OO developers for that.

          • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

            by Anonymous Coward

            Free isn't even the correct English word for 'free of charge'
            Sorry to pick on you grammer nazi but if your going to do it right you should follow your own advice look it up...

            http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/free%5B1%5D [merriam-webster.com]

            See number 10 'not costing or charging anything'

            That is FREE as in *NO* cost. There are other meanings of free, not just your narrow minded ones. I am with the original guy if I had a choice between OO and MS Office for free as in no cost (which he apparently has). It is not even

            • by x4nit0s (1340549) on Thursday May 07 2009, @01:27PM (#27864119)

              Sorry to pick on you grammer nazi but if your going to do it right you should follow your own advice

              Yes, "YOUR" right his "GRAMMER" was teh sux, also while we're at it when you say you could care less you imply that you do care about the issue, as you have the ability to care less than you currently do about it.

              Get a brane, moran!

          • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

            This just in: Words in the English language can actually have more than 1 meaning! But the Stallmanesque rant was pretty funny.
            • Re:Sorry but... (Score:4, Insightful)

              by 644bd346996 (1012333) on Thursday May 07 2009, @12:59PM (#27863633)

              The phrase "gratis of charge" is redundant. "Gratis" suffices, although it has the unfortunate side effect of making you sound like a pretentious scholar that likes to toss around latin words that nobody knows.

    • Forgive me, but I am a bit ignorant on this, could someone tell me when and how it came to pass that Oracle now has relationship with Open Office?

      You mean other than the fact that they own Sun and the OOo team is mostly Sun engineers? Yeah that was a pretty difficult one to solve.

      • Re:Oracle? (Score:5, Informative)

        by segfaultcoredump (226031) on Thursday May 07 2009, @12:38PM (#27863211)

        Technically, at this time oracle does not own sun.

        They have announced that they will purchase them and the sale is pending, but until that time the two companies are totally independent and functionally must continue to operate as such.

        So sometime this summer the oracle logo will be correct, but currently it is wrong.

    • Why on earth are business people doing statistics in an office suite rather than in a real statistical package?

    • by RobBebop (947356) on Thursday May 07 2009, @04:23PM (#27867391) Homepage Journal
      I'm sorry... but not including support for Visual Basic Applications makes it unprofessional? I don't believe I've ever seen anything that puts the terms "Professional" and "Visual Basic" in the same sentence. VB is a toy for high schoolers. Anybody developing VB beyond the 12th grade level had better be doing it to supplement a skillset unrelated to computer programming (for example: GUI design).
      • by gnesterenko (1457631) on Thursday May 07 2009, @06:31PM (#27869693)
        Someone has never worked in a corporate park, so let me tell you how things work. Major financial institution gets massive transmission from multiple vendors every day that must be entered into the major financial institution's tracking systems. All is done with proprietary software and has nothing to do with any office application. But when it comes to extracting and dealing with this massive amounts of data on an every day basis, performing yield and variance calculations, performing large-scale data scrubbing (10s of thousands of securities), variable rates, prices, and that doesn't even BEGIN to enumerate all the pieces of data that must be shared across a network thousands of computers large, analyzed by individuals in multiple departments, reported on, transmitted, and then integrated back into proprietary systems tied to the corporate mainframe. When Open Office can do this, then you can come back and talk to me. And this is just one example. The automation capabilities of VBA MAKE the financial industry work. Without it we'd be in the stone ages in terms of the time it takes to do certain tasks - as in, non competitive and out of business stone age... What many people here fail to realize is that very few organizations out there do 'pure' statistics or 'pure' data-basing. They may exist, but they are dwarfed when compared to all the soft inter-mediate companies that need to move and analyze large amounts of data, daily, timely, and across large networks. Open Office isn't even considered an option. It simply cannot integrate with various proprietary systems and enable collaboration like MS Office can. And I'm talking about Office 2003 too, as businesses haven't even migrated to Office 07 on a large scale yet, and that is even more powerful in terms of collaboration. Office is not a professional development platform, I hope you realize. No one is talking about writing major pieces of software. What we ARE talking about is efficiencies that save companies billions annually. Until Open Office can do the same, it is irrelevant in the business world. At home or at school however, like I said, its a perfect solution.