Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Evangelion Live Action Movie

Posted by michael on Wed May 21, 2003 08:15 AM
from the bass-ackwards dept.
Rob Sollanych writes "ADV Films has just announced the production of a live action movie based on many people's favourite anime series of all time, Neon Genesis Evangelion. Special Effects will be developed by Weta Workshop, Ltd, the company that made the Lord of the Rings look so good."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Evangelion Live Action Movie | Log In/Create an Account | Top | 335 comments (Spill at 50!) | Index Only | Search Discussion
Display Options Threshold:
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • Good One for Weta by Findel (Score:1) Wednesday May 21 2003, @08:18AM
  • top movies list by ih8apple (Score:2) Wednesday May 21 2003, @08:20AM
  • laws of nature (Score:4, Funny)

    by Syowr (50984) on Wednesday May 21 2003, @08:20AM (#6006596)
    Why when I saw this did I think "POWER RANGERS MOVIE" ....?

    Some things just shouldn't be done
    • Re:laws of nature (Score:4, Insightful)

      by Ryunosuke (576755) on Wednesday May 21 2003, @08:32AM (#6006693)
      (http://shashdot.org/)
      Amen. While I don't like to down a movie not even completed ... I'm saddened to think that one of the most overhyped, over advertised, and over fanboy'd will be made into a live action. As if the dub wasn't bad enough, now we'll have to SEE the people acting in it. I'm sure they'll rename and change things for us poor confused americans, since the dubbies are obviously the reason this is being made. I can't argue with the majority though ... as sad as it is, that's where the money is :(
      [ Parent ]
    • Re:laws of nature (Score:5, Insightful)

      by Bonker (243350) on Wednesday May 21 2003, @08:51AM (#6006838)
      I agree on so many lives. Live action EVA is bad, wrong, and stupid. Are they going to have a tall, busty Japanese woman playing Misato? Are they going to have fourteen-year-olds in skin-tight vinyl? Are they going to have a penguin? Are they going to have lots of Rei clones? Are they going to invoke the wrath of the Christian right with the decidedly mangled Christian imagery in Evangelion? Is Misato going to die in the second reel? How about Touji? Is Gendou going to cheat on his cute pregnant wife (who will almost have to be played by the same actress as the various Reis) with Ritsuko and her mom? Will Shinji be allowed to oedipally fantasize about all the-- again, fourteen year old-- girls on the cast?

      Unless the scriptwriter, director, and producer are willing to portray this story in all its gory beauty, they shouldn't even bother. I can't see them doing *HALF* of the things I listed above, and you really need *ALL* of them to get the story right.
      [ Parent ]
      • Re:laws of nature by BJH (Score:1) Wednesday May 21 2003, @09:03AM
      • Re:laws of nature (Score:5, Informative)

        by mblase (200735) on Wednesday May 21 2003, @09:16AM (#6007032)
        Unless the scriptwriter, director, and producer are willing to portray this story in all its gory beauty, they shouldn't even bother. I can't see them doing *HALF* of the things I listed above, and you really need *ALL* of them to get the story right.

        You're probably one of those people who became livid when Tom Bombadil was stripped from "Fellowship of the Ring", too. Do you really intend to hold it against them if they don't develop every last character in exactly the same way as the 13-hour series during a 2-hour movie?

        It'll be a translation of the story idea, the same as the X-Men movies had to do, and they'll reduce the number of developed characters to two or three and probably throw away most of the Angels and half of the Evas to keep it simple. If this movie works, it'll invite people to go back and watch the original animated series and manga, and that's good enough for me.

        Quitcherbitching. We don't need ALL of those elements to get the story right; you do. The rest of us have learned that if you want to turn anything longer than a short story into a feature film, compromises need to be made, and not all of them are necessarily bad.
        [ Parent ]
        • Re:laws of nature (Score:5, Interesting)

          by ishark (245915) on Wednesday May 21 2003, @09:54AM (#6007318)
          You're probably one of those people who became livid when Tom Bombadil was stripped from "Fellowship of the Ring", too. Do you really intend to hold it against them if they don't develop every last character in exactly the same way as the 13-hour series during a 2-hour movie?

          I don't know about him, but I personally found the idea of eliminating TB good, as it does not add much to the story and can be safely removed without messing up with the plot. I turned livid at "Faramir's massacre" or the Elves helping the humans at Helm's Deep, or Merry/Pippin "tricking" the Ents, as these are completely useless from the point of view of book->film conversion, but also fuck up what Tolkien wrote (and the elf one indicates a serious misundestanding).

          Evangelion has a lot of strong/important points. If they want to keep "the message" they cannot change much. All the elements cited above ARE important, remove them and be ready to become target practice (verbal only :) for Eva fans.

          As I always say: there's nothing wrong in filming a grandma on a toliet for two hours, just don't title it "The Lord of the Rings".

          When basing movies on "huge" books, people should basically not mess up with any element. The book was "huge" because of what it is: stick to it or do something different. Changing stuff looks like wanting to get easy cash from the big name.
          [ Parent ]
        • Re:laws of nature by JudgeFurious (Score:3) Wednesday May 21 2003, @10:42AM
        • Re:laws of nature by MagikSlinger (Score:2) Wednesday May 21 2003, @01:58PM
      • Re:laws of nature (Score:4, Funny)

        by Graspee_Leemoor (302316) on Wednesday May 21 2003, @11:10AM (#6007889)
        (http://www.ps2emu.com/ | Last Journal: Saturday July 05 2003, @05:18PM)
        ensign: Captain, we have spoilers off the port bow!

        riker: red alert!

        picard: what is their status, mr. data?

        data: They appear to be attempting to spoil the plot, sir.

        picard: tactical analysis, mr. worf.

        worf: captain, they are charging moderations! They are at + 5 !!!

        captain: ready all phaser banks and photon torpedos, maximum yield, minimum spread. Fire!

        graspee

        [ Parent ]
      • lol did you actually watch the series? by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Wednesday May 21 2003, @12:25PM
      • Re:laws of nature by Captain Splendid (Score:1) Wednesday May 21 2003, @03:35PM
      • Re:laws of nature by Rolman (Score:2) Wednesday May 21 2003, @03:35PM
      • Re:laws of nature by NeoOokami (Score:1) Wednesday May 21 2003, @04:09PM
      • Re:laws of nature by Psyienna (Score:1) Wednesday May 21 2003, @06:47PM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Remember Guyver? by morin'stal (Score:1) Wednesday May 21 2003, @10:55AM
    • Re:laws of nature by yoshi1013 (Score:1) Wednesday May 21 2003, @01:21PM
    • 3 replies beneath your current threshold.
  • What a bad idea (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Gyorg_Lavode (520114) on Wednesday May 21 2003, @08:21AM (#6006606)
    Neon Genesis was completed in the anime and 2 movies. There isn't anything to add to it. The series contains all the monster fights and it contains the ending. The series isn't about the action, it's about the emotions of shinji.

    I can't see this movie doing anything but hurting the rest of the plot of the series. If they want to do a live action they should do cowboy bebop. You can fit another cowboy bebop film in about anywhere you want. But Neon Geneis is completed. If it ain't broke, don't fix it.

    • Re:What a bad idea by Vintermann (Score:1) Wednesday May 21 2003, @08:32AM
    • How can you say that? (Score:5, Interesting)

      by zeus_tfc (222250) on Wednesday May 21 2003, @08:39AM (#6006746)
      (http://slashdot.org/ | Last Journal: Tuesday January 07 2003, @02:57PM)
      (warning, sarcasm threat level today is at RED)

      How can you possibly say that? Look at all the great work that has been done bringing anime and the like to the silver screen. I mean, just look at Fist of the North Star. [imdb.com]

      And besides, the effects studio not only did LOTR, but also gave us the effects in such quality shows as Andromeda, and Mutant X!

      How can this NOT be good?

      OK, all sarcasm aside, I don't see how this can be anything but a bad thing. Even so, there is some potential, but it will still PO lots of fans. The only way that this could have some merit is if they did the same thing Sam Raimi did with SpiderMan, that is don't try to duplicate the story exactly, but try and capture the "feel" and the essence doing a stand-alone movie that doesn't really fit into the existing material. This has the greatest potential for success, but also, as with SpiderMan, the greatest potential to tick off the purists and the avid fans.

      I don't have much hope for it though. Pity. I'll have to wait and see what happens.
      [ Parent ]
    • Re:What a bad idea (Score:5, Insightful)

      by johny_qst (623876) on Wednesday May 21 2003, @08:44AM (#6006788)
      (Last Journal: Thursday October 09 2003, @02:39PM)
      I am just as concerned that an actor attempting to portray the depth of shinji's internal struggle will just make a cheesy patina atop some cool CG action sequences. This movie won't help by adding to the evangelion storyline... but it might get some people who would never have come into contact with the anime to actually find the quality that spawned this waste of film. I know I will see it but I also know that it won't stand up to its anime roots.
      [ Parent ]
    • Re:What a bad idea by Hasdi Hashim (Score:3) Wednesday May 21 2003, @09:26AM
    • Re:What a bad idea by tabby (Score:1) Wednesday May 21 2003, @10:46AM
    • Nothing to add? by Bodrius (Score:2) Wednesday May 21 2003, @04:44PM
    • Re:What a bad idea by goat_attack (Score:1) Wednesday May 21 2003, @05:41PM
  • NOOOOOOOOOO!!! by darkmayo (Score:1) Wednesday May 21 2003, @08:22AM
  • why am I unenthused? (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Doktor Memory (237313) on Wednesday May 21 2003, @08:22AM (#6006614)
    (Last Journal: Tuesday March 25 2003, @04:35PM)
    ...perhaps because low-budget live-action anime adaptations [imdb.com] do not have a reputation for quality?
  • I'm scared by Xaoswolf (Score:2) Wednesday May 21 2003, @08:23AM
  • What is needed is a live action Gundam film, and yes i know there already is one, i want one i can see in theatres. With the current crop of superhero/sci-fi action films doing so well (spider-man, x-men, the matrix) i thikn a movie about giant city smashing robots would do pretty well, its a fairly new concept to americans.
  • Shin Seiki Evangelion took over my life for a good year-and-a-half [angelfire.com]...until the long-delayed release of The End of Evangelion in the US finally brought sweet release. NOW THIS? Please, Gainax...I want my life back.

    PS - evaotaku.com [evaotaku.com]
  • Animatrix (Score:5, Insightful)

    by gerf (532474) <edtgerf@gmail.com> on Wednesday May 21 2003, @08:28AM (#6006649)
    (Last Journal: Monday July 29 2002, @08:50AM)

    I never really thought much of Anime in general. I grouped anime watchers in with goths, freaks, Magic the Gathering players, and others i just ignored.

    I'm a Matrix fan, and as such, i downloaded The Animatrix: The Second Generation, Part I. I was astounded. Rather than large mouth monkey drawn, slow plotted, boring anime, such as is found on the Cartoon Network, instead, something more akin to what i thought Asimov's robots would be like was presented. I've since downloaded all the free short stories from the Wachowski bro's, and plan on buying the DVD.

    What i want to say though, is that perhaps this anime converted to real life will have the same effect on people, perhaps to a larger audience, showing more people that anime isn't just a cartoon for the vast unlaid, but rather something more meaningful, with great plots and scriptwriters. On another note, I'm going to watch Spirited Away this weekend, due to its great reviews, and the fact that i saw the first 5 minutes, and was impressed at the overall feel of it.

    Good luck with this project, i hope it does great!

    • Re:Animatrix by mblase (Score:3) Wednesday May 21 2003, @09:18AM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:Animatrix by VEGx (Score:1) Wednesday May 21 2003, @09:30AM
    • Re:Animatrix by Upaut (Score:1) Wednesday May 21 2003, @11:53AM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:Animatrix by Catiline (Score:2) Wednesday May 21 2003, @03:08PM
    • 3 replies beneath your current threshold.
  • How long do they plan on making it. (Score:5, Insightful)

    by darkmayo (251580) on Wednesday May 21 2003, @08:28AM (#6006657)
    Seriously.. Alot goes on in the anime.. 13 angels to destroy.. a shit load of character development and thats not even including the End of Evangelion movie.

    The series is done. Let people look back and say.. "damn that was an awesome series" instead of " What the hell was that live action POS"
    • by Jerk City Troll (661616) on Wednesday May 21 2003, @08:40AM (#6006755)
      (http://anti-slash.org/)
      Most of the angel battles were, in my opinion, just there for fluff. It was action to keep the less philosophically inclined audience glued to the TV sets for the next episode. All the plot development could probably have been condensed down into 4-6 episodes. Except of course for the occassional Ayanami Rei narratives. I for one would not mind seeing a live action movie that was densely packed, had a rapid time line, and showed how grotesque a lot of Evangelion was. For example, a lot of the emotional development of the characters was due to the horrors they witnessed fighting the angels. Cartoon blood does not effectively convey this to the audience. Also, whle EoE was intense -- gives me the chills just thinking about it -- an anime cannot properly portray the deaths of 7 billion human beings. I think a live action film will show quite nicely why so many of the characters lost their marbles.
      [ Parent ]
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • by BabyDave (575083) on Wednesday May 21 2003, @08:30AM (#6006671)
    "I mustn't run away, I mustn't run away"
  • dang. but who would you cast? by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Wednesday May 21 2003, @08:31AM
  • I feel sorry for the person to play Shinji by darkmayo (Score:1) Wednesday May 21 2003, @08:31AM
  • Yeah, considering the number of anime fans it's driven into therapy, I'd consider Evangelion "influential".
  • I dunno... by Saint Mitchell (Score:1) Wednesday May 21 2003, @08:38AM
  • A Movie Not To See by Repugnant_Shit (Score:1) Wednesday May 21 2003, @08:41AM
    • Re:A Movie Not To See by Jerk City Troll (Score:2) Wednesday May 21 2003, @08:48AM
      • Re:A Movie Not To See by Hast (Score:3) Wednesday May 21 2003, @09:05AM
      • Re:A Movie Not To See (Score:4, Insightful)

        by BJH (11355) on Wednesday May 21 2003, @09:24AM (#6007091)
        Refer to my earlier reply to one of your posts as to the meaning of the last two episodes. I'd just like to comment further on your portrayal of the significance of EoE.

        Shinji doesn't freeze at the moment of truth; he's eventually ready to unite with all humanity, but Asuka's rejection of this causes him to choose to return to individuality. The movie doesn't show a "failed" Third Impact, just a scenario in which the uniting of humanity does not take place as Yui planned. She ends up as the only human to live for eternity (that's why you see Shinji's Eva floating off; it's carrying Yui). Rewatch it and listen carefully to Yui's "conversation" with Shinji.

        **********MAJOR SPOILER for people who haven't watched EoE***********

        The final scene of EoE is very ambiguous; Shinji and Asuka (and possibly all other humans except for Yui) have been reincarnated as individuals as a result of Asuka's rejection of unification with Shinji. Many people see this as an indication of Asuka's feelings for Shinji, in that she doesn't wish him to know how deep her emotions are for him. Even the last line (which, in all the subbed versions I've seen, seems to be mistranslated) is ambiguous; it was actually an adlib by the voice actress, which Anno considered to be better than the script. What Asuka says could either be taken as a further rejection of Shinji as an extension of her earlier rejection, or as an indication of a genuine dislike of him. It's a bit hard to justify the latter considering what has occurred previous to that, though. I think the ending of EoE is actually rather positive - "humans should make the effort to do get along with each other as individuals".

        [ Parent ]
      • Re:A Movie Not To See by Repugnant_Shit (Score:1) Wednesday May 21 2003, @09:53AM
      • Re:A Movie Not To See by Gendou (Score:3) Wednesday May 21 2003, @06:12PM
    • Re:A Movie Not To See by BJH (Score:1) Wednesday May 21 2003, @09:01AM
  • by thatguywhoiam (524290) on Wednesday May 21 2003, @08:44AM (#6006783)
    ... which I can already tell is happening... why not?

    I mean, I tend to agree that really astonishing works - like Evangelion - do not really 'need' to be re-made in a new way, but at the same time, I don't think it hurts anything. The Gus van Sant remake of Psycho, for instance, was nothing special at all, and not as good as the original... but who cares? I could have ignored it. It's not like it *replaces* the old film.

    Besides, WETA kicks heroic amounts of ass, and they get an automatic vote as far as I'm concerned for the top-notch work in LOTR. They deserve some credit.

    My question is, how 'live-action' can it really be? Live actors surely, but I'm guessing the bulk of the action will be CG... and do I want to see a top-quality CG adaptation of an Evangelion battle sequence? Hell yeah.

  • i remember by m1chael (Score:1) Wednesday May 21 2003, @08:45AM
  • Why? by JVStalin (Score:1) Wednesday May 21 2003, @08:46AM
  • by LordYUK (552359) <jeffwright821NO@SPAMyahoo.com> on Wednesday May 21 2003, @08:46AM (#6006802)
    This just in.

    Tux, the famed mascot on the Linux world, has been cast in the role of Penpen!

    Also appearing, the BSD Devil will make a special guest shot as "the guy who sent the angels to destroy Earth!"

    They're kidding, right? A live action NGE flick?

    Things I'd like to see next:

    Live action Dragon Ball Z. The movie would have to be about 19 hours long with frequent intermissions, and roughly 3 battles during that time in order to make it feel like the show.

    Live action Tokyo Pig. What would be more exciting than a pig that can do magic, FILMED IN REAL LIFE! And that reporter chic is HOT!

    Live action Dirty Pair. Okay, this isnt a joke. Remember Angelina Jolie as Lara Croft? Multiply that by two, add in tons of explosions and skimpy clothes, and BAM you got a winner!

    I could go on all day, but I think I'll stop now!
  • [advfilms.com] by illuminatedwax (Score:2) Wednesday May 21 2003, @08:47AM
  • Does this mean... (Score:4, Interesting)

    by darkitecture (627408) on Wednesday May 21 2003, @08:49AM (#6006817)

    Does this mean that it won't go all wacky and weird in the end, like every anime? :P

    Akira was great until the weird-ass things started happening... like giant blobs of flesh and stuff.

    Spriggan was good until the exact same thing happened.

    Serial Experiments: Lain was absolutely FANTASTIC until all that supernatural stuff started to take over the plot.

    What's with the freaking out? Do Japanese anime creators resort to drugs to finish off their masterpieces? It's as if they were on to something good and then they just decided to rush the ending... "umm... err... oh screw it, I'll throw in some freaky psychosomatic flesh monsters... that'll do it!"

    But with all honesty, I hope it turns out good. With the advent of a live action Battle Angel Alita, it'll be nice to see some non-anime mech footage hitting the screens.

    My vote is for Dominique Swain to play Osuka! She's a hottie :)
  • Big O would have been a better choice by tekrat (Score:2) Wednesday May 21 2003, @08:49AM
  • Tom Cruise will make a cameo as Speed Racer by sammyo (Score:1) Wednesday May 21 2003, @08:49AM
  • I'm just wondering... by MeanE (Score:1) Wednesday May 21 2003, @08:51AM
  • Shinji... Shinji... by LynXmaN (Score:2) Wednesday May 21 2003, @08:59AM
  • Is this a SECOND live movie? by $lashdot (Score:1) Wednesday May 21 2003, @09:01AM
  • by Mulletproof (513805) on Wednesday May 21 2003, @09:01AM (#6006928)
    (http://www.dreamops.com/ | Last Journal: Sunday October 02 2005, @10:05AM)
    Is anybody going to watch a live action movie so filled with angst and self-loathing as Evangelion? I mean, leaving aside the attention span of the average movie goer, the plot of Evangelion is so damn convoluted it's scary. I'm firmly convinced that anybody claiming they really knew what Evangelion was about is A LIAR. Sure, the action is good, and some of the plot elements are well done, but it's going to have to be heavily edited and altered before this becomes anything but painful feature to watch.
  • Another good thing goin bad by mobileskimo (Score:1) Wednesday May 21 2003, @09:16AM
  • all the possibitys... by Discoloda (Score:2) Wednesday May 21 2003, @09:19AM
  • I give them the benefit of doubt by mxpengin (Score:1) Wednesday May 21 2003, @09:21AM
  • Live Action? by supun (Score:2) Wednesday May 21 2003, @09:25AM
  • by Trunks (35615) on Wednesday May 21 2003, @09:30AM (#6007132)
    According to this article [animenewsnetwork.com], the project will be on an "aggressive timetable." Does that mean the last 20 minutes will end up being taken from footage filmed with an old camcorder on a shaky tripod? It would at least be consistent with the last 2 Eva episodes...
  • Alan Rickman as Gendo Ikari.

  • It might not be THAT bad ... (Score:4, Informative)

    by lythari (118242) on Wednesday May 21 2003, @09:53AM (#6007313)
    I was extremely sceptical when I first read about this. But now that i've thought about it for a while, a live action Eva film might not be THAT bad.


    The important thing is that there's no sign of any hollywood studio being involved. I suspect that means that most of the creative work will be done by Gainax, with ADV providing the $$$$ and Weta obviously doing the special effects. If Gainax and Anno are left to do their thing, then the project might turn out alright. The special effects might look a big cheap due to a (relatively) small budget, but I can't imagine Gainax and Anno sanitizing Eva like everyone says.


    But then again, this is Gainax we're talking about ...

  • The script... (Score:5, Funny)

    by Chagatai (524580) on Wednesday May 21 2003, @10:06AM (#6007398)
    (http://slashdot.org/)
    I managed to find a copy of the live-action Evangelion script. Here is an excerpt:

    Shinji: Whine whine whine whine whine.

    Asuka: Ego driven retort with subtle sexual undertones.

    Shinji: Whine whine whine piss moan.

    Rei: Creepy silence followed by one-word retort.

    Shinji: Whine whine bitch piss whine bitch moan.

    Gendo: Evil overlord smile.

  • Favorite Anime? by JThaddeus (Score:1) Wednesday May 21 2003, @10:09AM
  • yeah by sstory (Score:2) Wednesday May 21 2003, @10:14AM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Why do people like Evangelion? by cyranoVR (Score:2) Wednesday May 21 2003, @10:20AM
  • I'm not happy and i'm not sad by Mozaholic (Score:2) Wednesday May 21 2003, @10:22AM
  • Did you suffer through the entirety Eva and for some reason weren't granted the same level of transcendence that most Eva-faithful appear to have gone through? Sure, parts were fun, parts were exciting, parts were a bit emotional, but you simply can't find it in yourself to declare that Eva somehow ties everything together into a logical conclusion filled with actual meaning? Are you certain that the random Judeo-Christian imagery, surreal character development, and insane ending are actually a high school level attempt to fake depth of plot, philosophy, and maturity?

    Take your suffering and at least get a good laugh out of it with Toastyfrog Jump's Neon Genesis Evangelion Thumbnail Theatre [toastyfrog.com].

  • i just checked my pants... by mr_gerbik (Score:1) Wednesday May 21 2003, @10:42AM
  • Why Bother With A Full Blown Movie...(Toastyfrog!) by EXTomar (Score:2) Wednesday May 21 2003, @10:58AM
  • I don't need to say anything more than this: by jellisky (Score:2) Wednesday May 21 2003, @11:17AM
  • Things to look (and listen) for by pizen (Score:2) Wednesday May 21 2003, @11:40AM
  • It'll be hard... by Peterus7 (Score:2) Wednesday May 21 2003, @11:40AM
  • How heavily is GAINAX involved with this project? by May Kasahara (Score:2) Wednesday May 21 2003, @11:43AM
  • EVA vote (Score:4, Funny)

    by S.I.O. (180787) on Wednesday May 21 2003, @12:07PM (#6008434)

    1) I understand 0.005% of the story

    2) I understand 0.05% of the story

    3) I understand 0.5% of the story

    4) My name is CowboyNeal Ikari,

    you insensitive clod

  • I'm thinking it's about time ... by Tom O'Brien (Score:1) Wednesday May 21 2003, @12:27PM
  • Didn't they already do this? by Fluid Donkey (Score:2) Wednesday May 21 2003, @12:28PM
  • Hmmmm by Altima(BoB) (Score:1) Wednesday May 21 2003, @12:41PM
  • Why EVA, of all series?? by Paradox (Score:1) Wednesday May 21 2003, @12:59PM
  • There is hope yet. by tloh (Score:1) Wednesday May 21 2003, @01:00PM
  • I disagree with the naysaying by dancingmad (Score:1) Wednesday May 21 2003, @01:54PM
  • My main question by Xeth (Score:1) Wednesday May 21 2003, @02:30PM
  • Hope it's as good a Guyver! by mayns (Score:1) Wednesday May 21 2003, @03:06PM
  • Live Action in The End of Evangelion movie by [Rob] (Score:1) Wednesday May 21 2003, @03:23PM
  • Meh by Have Blue (Score:2) Wednesday May 21 2003, @03:56PM
  • And the search has begun... by IroygbivU (Score:1) Wednesday May 21 2003, @05:26PM
  • That's a bad idea from the start... (Score:4, Insightful)

    by Hadriven (670847) on Wednesday May 21 2003, @05:29PM (#6011438)
    You know, it has been imagined before that a live-action Evangelion movie could be done, but it ended with the conclusion : let's hope it doesn't happens.

    There are a few reasons about this.

    1. FUNDS. How can an adaptation of a series that's full of heavy steel, gunfire, apocalyptic explosions, mind-boggling psychotrips be correctly done, out of the "cellulo-space" ?
    One of the reasons of why Anime earned such a success in Japan is that filmmakers there didn't have enough money to crank out movies without said movies seriously lacking... funds. Celluloid really IS cheaper for impossible scenes like some that are in Eva... And porting this to the silver screen should require some huge amounts of money. Where are they going to find the budget usually used for an announced blockbuster ? I hopa Gainax's not going to spend too much on that, I'd really get angry if they had to close before of the bankrupt following the release of that movie.

    2. CHARACTERS. Ikari Shinji. Soryû Langley Asuka. Ayanami Rei. These surely sound European, heh ? What are they going do ? Rename all those people, thus moving the entire story in the US and getting American actors ? (yeah, "Washington-3", sure.)
    Or will they stick with Japanese actors ? How can you even reproduce de-japanized japanese people drawn on celluloid well enough ? I'll be curious to see who gets the role for Ayanami Rei. If it destroys my dream vision of an almost-perfect (barring an introverted-beyond-autism personality) human being...

    3. STORYLINE. How will you ever be able to summarize that twisted series that is Evangelion into something that can be seen in 2-3 hours ? Or if you take the problem the other way, how will you take a part of the series without screwing the entire context/continuity/complexity ?
    And what about the complexity itself ? Will the scenario scaled-down for the non-depressed to understand ? I surely don't want to see an action film made out of THIS. Do you ?

    4. WAY OF THINKING. There are things Japanese can stand that Americans can't, and the other way. What would be done about those things ? I mean, there are some in the storyline that are understood (and appreciated ?) by us nerds, but for the others... Remember the beginning of EoE, you'll get an idea of what I mean.

    I spent too much weeks staring at the ceiling after having seen Eva to let it become a botched adaptation. Really.

    - Hadriven
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • If they're going to do it at all... by orlando24 (Score:1) Wednesday May 21 2003, @06:02PM
  • The cast has been confirmed! by twoallbeefpatties (Score:1) Wednesday May 21 2003, @09:06PM
  • Live-action? by RoC MasterMind (Score:1) Wednesday May 21 2003, @10:20PM
  • great... by CCIEwannabe (Score:1) Wednesday May 21 2003, @11:06PM
  • Eva and alot of other things by Ren_Nailo (Score:1) Thursday May 22 2003, @12:59AM
  • www.geo.front.ru by Larnir (Score:1) Thursday May 22 2003, @01:13AM
  • Re:I hope this doesnt suck! by Dolentron 3030 (Score:1) Wednesday May 21 2003, @08:25AM
    • Re:I hope this doesnt suck! (Score:5, Interesting)

      by Minna Kirai (624281) on Wednesday May 21 2003, @08:33AM (#6006700)
      but things in LOTR that have the heaviest computer manipulation are things that are magic or take place in the ring's netherworld

      That's just completely untrue. What about the thousands of warriors at the Battle of Helm's Deep? The majestic fortresses, the grotesque oliphaunts?

      LOTR was filled with CG from head to toe, for subjects neither explicitly magical nor netherworldly. (I won't go into Golum- one could say he's magic too, instead of simply malnourished)

      The CG needs for an Evangelion movie (an ill-starred project if there ever was one) will be similar to LOTR. They'll have to create realistic depictions of huge, improbable structures for the actors to be projected in front of. Then they'll have to build large creatures which look natural when stationary (like the Ents) and command them to move in ways that are smooth and life-like, but far from human-like.
      [ Parent ]
    • Re:I hope this doesnt suck! by MidnightBrewer (Score:1) Wednesday May 21 2003, @09:51AM
  • Re:OK (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Jerk City Troll (661616) on Wednesday May 21 2003, @08:36AM (#6006721)
    (http://anti-slash.org/)
    So they are going to make a movie about some kid who pilots a huge robotic weapon to battle alien invaders.

    How can you watch Shinseki Evangelion and not understand:

    - They aren't alien invaders (in fact, they're 98% human), they're angels. You know, as in from Heaven? They've come to earth to bring about the 3rd Impact which will (pressumably) destroy humanity.
    - The fight with the angels is secondary to the plot. The story of Evangelion is about Ikari Shinji who embodies the inante human fear of other humans (hence the existence of the Absolute Terror Field or AT Field). The goal of his father, Ikari Gendou, is to eliminate the AT Fields so that all humanity can be united and thus ascend to the level of God.

    Evangelion is intensely deeper than that and I've shaved off most of the details, otherwise this post would be pages long. But those two things are obvious if you've only seen the episodes (in which Gendou is successful and a "positive" 3rd Impact is achieved). The movies turn that around and show what would happen if things went wrong (because of Shinji's own emotional strife).

    I could go on and on, but Eva is not just about action. In fact, the action often carries meaningful undercurrents (especially when Shinji first fights Sachiel).

    *sigh*

    Nevermind.
    [ Parent ]
    • Re:OK (Score:4, Informative)

      by BJH (11355) on Wednesday May 21 2003, @08:58AM (#6006900)
      A couple of points...

      - The uniting of humanity is not Gendo's aim, but rather his dead wife's (Shinji's mother). Gendo's aim is to be reunited with her; everything else is secondary for him. The reason for her attempt was to ensure that humanity survived effectively forever (at least until the heat-death of the universe).
      - The Third Impact was not really "positive" in the series; some people think that the series ending was just Shinji tripping out. Anno dropped several hints as to what actually happened (in the series, there's a couple of very short cuts showing a certain death scene (don't want to spoil it for others). A more cynical view is that Anno's lack of funding at the end simply lead him to give a giant 'fuck-you' to the production company by producing the most unsuitable closure possible.
      [ Parent ]
      • Re:OK by Qzukk (Score:2) Wednesday May 21 2003, @09:02AM
        • OT by BJH (Score:1) Wednesday May 21 2003, @09:46AM
      • Re:OK by Gendou (Score:1) Wednesday May 21 2003, @11:53AM
        • Re:OK by BJH (Score:1) Wednesday May 21 2003, @12:15PM
      • Re:OK by BJH (Score:2) Wednesday May 21 2003, @09:37AM
        • Re:OK by markdesign (Score:1) Wednesday May 21 2003, @11:23AM
        • Re:OK by BJH (Score:1) Wednesday May 21 2003, @12:50PM
        • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:OK by Paolomania (Score:1) Wednesday May 21 2003, @02:29PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Re:Just like the Gundam Live Action Movie? by cyranoVR (Score:2) Wednesday May 21 2003, @08:38AM
  • Re:I hope this doesnt suck! by fenix down (Score:1) Wednesday May 21 2003, @08:47AM
  • Re:not giving chance.. by stratjakt (Score:1) Wednesday May 21 2003, @08:56AM
  • Huh? by mobileskimo (Score:1) Wednesday May 21 2003, @09:06AM
    • Re:Huh? by tuffy (Score:2) Wednesday May 21 2003, @09:24AM
      • Re:Huh? by Graspee_Leemoor (Score:1) Wednesday May 21 2003, @11:24AM
    • Preserve by mobileskimo (Score:1) Thursday May 22 2003, @09:08AM
  • Re:not giving chance.. by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Wednesday May 21 2003, @09:16AM
  • Re:*sigh* by Discoloda (Score:1) Wednesday May 21 2003, @09:22AM
    • Re:*sigh* by knisa (Score:1) Thursday May 22 2003, @01:17PM
  • That's because by discogravy (Score:1) Wednesday May 21 2003, @09:26AM
  • Re:MPAA by Rev Saxon (Score:1) Wednesday May 21 2003, @10:27PM
  • Re:a better plot ... by mink (Score:1) Wednesday May 28 2003, @02:03PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • 32 replies beneath your current threshold.