Slashdot Log In
Torrentocracy = RSS + Bit Torrent + Your TV
Posted by
timothy
on Mon Jun 21, 2004 06:47 AM
from the clairvoygence dept.
from the clairvoygence dept.
lerhaupt writes "I've started a project called Torrentocracy which is the combination of RSS, Bit Torrent and your Television. It's written as a plugin for MythTV (the homebrew Linux PVR project). This means you can not only easily find out about new torrents from various enclosure enabled blogs, but you can also start the torrent download process with the click of your TV remote control. Are RSS aggregators which support torrent downloads the next greatest thing since web browsers? What is the significance of hooking this directly to your TV? Here's a screenshot."
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
Torrentocracy = RSS + Bit Torrent + Your TV
|
Log In/Create an Account
| Top
| 172 comments
| Search Discussion
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
Sounds Wonderful (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Sounds Wonderful (Score:4, Insightful)
(http://www.emaculation.com/)
You would have to leave your PVR/whatever on to seed, but as you might of noticed, your computer continues to function with your monitor off.
Re:Sounds Wonderful (Score:5, Funny)
(http://www.codehackers.net/ | Last Journal: Wednesday October 11 2006, @01:46PM)
Plus, if you use the switch on your monitor, you can get some awesome boot times!
Re:Sounds Wonderful (Score:5, Funny)
(http://www.martingunnarsson.com/)
Re:Sounds Wonderful (Score:5, Funny)
(Last Journal: Friday January 30 2004, @03:41PM)
Sad but true: we have a client who prints out emails so he can fax back the reply...
Psst. Buddy. (Score:5, Funny)
(http://www.numbski.com/ | Last Journal: Thursday May 26 2005, @10:44PM)
Just a thought.
Kthx.
From "The Matrix" (Score:5, Funny)
(http://www.numbski.com/ | Last Journal: Thursday May 26 2005, @10:44PM)
"No Lieutenant, your webserver is already dead."
Interface (Score:5, Interesting)
(http://millahtime.blogspot.com/ | Last Journal: Friday July 15 2005, @01:00PM)
Can't look at the screen shot though. been
Re:Interface (Score:5, Funny)
(Last Journal: Friday January 30 2004, @03:41PM)
When I sit down in front of the TV I become a veg. Anything not easy is just plain to hard to do.
Damn, that's true. Why is it that I can write shell scripts and debug Perl, but have never been able to program my VCR? Selective stupidity - or lack of tin-foil hat? ;)
Webserver go boom (Score:3, Funny)
Bad rep (Score:2, Insightful)
(http://skangers.tripod.com/ | Last Journal: Tuesday October 18 2005, @05:15AM)
Re:Bad rep (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Bad rep (Score:5, Interesting)
Bit torrent, however can serve up the 400+ mb file within an hour and the developers can just set up the link to the seed from their site. It carries an air of legitimacy greater than you can achieve by saying "or look for the file on eMule".
Comparatively little use of BT for Warez (Score:5, Interesting)
(http://www.clickonstore.net/)
BitTorrent has successfully been used to provide everything from ISOs for distros to large commercial game demos.
The use of BT for transmitting illegal warez etc has been minimal mainly because BT requires a larger number of people to be interested in the particular warez than most P2P software for a download to work.
Its worth remembering that the primary use of BT is to get large files out to large numbers of people as soon after a given date as possible (while using the minimum of initial bandwidth).
What the article is actually getting at tho is that the PVR can be used to easily start a BT download on another (perhaps headless) machine to which the TV/PVR is networked.
Its convenient and useful but hardly revolutionary in this case.
Smirk (Score:3, Funny)
(http://put-your-mone...r-mouth-is.com/blog/ | Last Journal: Monday January 29 2007, @02:44PM)
Slashdotters: Cool. (Click)(Click)(Click)
Slashdot: Arrrrrrrrrrrrgh!!!! [[[[Crush]]]]
Server: (Dies)
Guy: Well now that you've killed my server... I guess my project can't continue.
Slashdot: Thanks for letting us know about your project.
Computer + TV card (Score:5, Insightful)
(Last Journal: Wednesday July 14 2004, @06:28AM)
i love the idea of torrents but ... (Score:1, Insightful)
(http://www.bowlie.com/forum/)
if this is to work on a television, maybe torrents should start to be paired with PAR files to create a far more robust method of fetching large files.
sure these might need to be seeded and torrent files too, but as the PAR files could be dramatically smaller (i.e. 15% of size depending on size of parity) than the full torrent file, they could be published on the sites of the copyright owner (in the case of legit works where the company is using torrents to save bandwidth).
simply put, user expectations when they use simple devices like a TV is that it just works... how many times have you NOT got a complete torrent and
just my 2c!
Re:i love the idea of torrents but ... (Score:4, Informative)
(http://www.ramskov.org/)
Re:i love the idea of torrents but ... (Score:5, Informative)
(Last Journal: Monday April 07 2003, @07:39AM)
This doesn't make any sense. Torrents are completely reliable -- they already have block and file level hashing and automatic re-downloading of blocks in case of transmission errors, etc. The only time you won't get a complete torrent is if there are no complete copies of the file being served. Adding error correcting codes (e.g. PAR files) would make the total file larger, and only recover from incomplete torrents that are _almost_ complete (i.e. would have been complete if the PAR file hadn't made it 15% larger). Just make sure that anything you're downloading has a couple of seeds before starting the download.
Re:i love the idea of torrents but ... (Score:5, Informative)
What this has to do with PAR2s are obvious: the entire effective functionality of PAR2s is already integrated into BT, automatically. It's not something that users can turn on or off, it's an integral part of the protocol.
The cause of your problem is likely that your torrent ran out of seeds before you finished downloading. Look at the "distributed copies" number your client gives you. That represents how many effective copies there are of a torrent. (Say client A has the first 50% of a torrent, and client B has the second 50%. Those are the only two peers. That's 1.0 distributed copies, since even though neither peer has a full copy, the two of them together do.) If the number is below zero, you will never be able to download the entire torrent unless a seed pops in.
As BT clients advance, this is becoming rarer. There's a "super-seeding" option of some clients which helps get out sparsely-seeded torrents as fast as possible by refusing to send the same chunk more than once.
If this is a problem for you - trying to get poorly-seeded torrents - you might want to try out Azureus. It preferentially grabs complete files inside a torrent first, and you can tell it which files to try for.
Re:i love the idea of torrents but ... (Score:4, Interesting)
(http://slashdot.org/)
Conincidentally, being able to prefer one file over another is one of the reasons that we have poorly-seeded torrents to begin with.
The mainline BT client does not support this becuase it interferes with it's rarest-first algorithms. It will download the pieces that are in danger of falling off the network before it will download a more common piece.
I agree that preferring files may be a useful feature from the user's point of view, but it's still a selfish thing to do, and makes the 99%-and-no-seed problems worse and more frequent with it's use.
Dangerous New Bomb (Score:5, Funny)
Wait... (Score:4, Funny)
what's the ocracy? (Score:3, Funny)
Easily Tracked? (Score:5, Interesting)
(http://artlu.net/ | Last Journal: Wednesday June 09 2004, @02:32PM)
Thoughts?
GroupShares Inc. [groupshares.com] - A completely free stock trading community!
Re:Easily Tracked? (Score:5, Informative)
(Last Journal: Monday April 07 2003, @07:39AM)
A good advancement, but not a totally new trick (Score:5, Informative)
(http://www.0daymeme.com/ | Last Journal: Friday August 24 2001, @10:54AM)
Now you've done it, Thanks for all the work Isaac. (Score:5, Insightful)
(http://jameswhite.org/)
Re:Now you've done it, Thanks for all the work Isa (Score:4, Insightful)
(http://www.everydns.net/ | Last Journal: Saturday April 26 2003, @12:34PM)
Re:Now you've done it, Thanks for all the work Isa (Score:5, Funny)
"...MythTV will be indistinguishable from "Movie Pirates" in the MPAA's eyes..."
Ahem. They prefer to be called [dieselsweeties.com] buccaneer americans. [dieselsweeties.com]
I mean honestly, the insensitivity of some people.
Caught on google (Score:2, Informative)
(http://expatexp.blogspot.com/)
Appropriateness of torrents for this, and legals (Score:3, Interesting)
1. I thought torrents randomly sent chunks from all over the file, rather than as a stream. Wouldn't this make no sense unless you wanted to wait forever for the program to be completely downloaded ?
2. Given the large amount of copyrighted programs made available on torrent networks, isn't this an effort to make mainstream what might be otherwise illegal ? Does it make sense to put this amount of effort into support of what might be intended to be an illegal activity for most ?
I would have RTFA but its slashdotted, so I couldn't confirm for myself how torrents are an appropriate medium, and whether the issues of widespread support for copyright violations are addressed.
Re:Appropriateness of torrents for this, and legal (Score:5, Informative)
(http://www.bigfoot.com/~tom_ford/)
If you think about it, if torrents were purely sequential they would be very slow since if say 10 people started torrenting from 1 seed they would all be fighting over the same blocks and couldn't help each other.
Re:Appropriateness of torrents for this, and legal (Score:5, Insightful)
(http://slashdot.org/ | Last Journal: Wednesday September 24 2003, @10:01AM)
In a previous post [slashdot.org] I talked about a similar problem when TiVo suggested a similar feature. I think this would apply here too. This doesn't change the DVR recording model, which is schedule something and watch it later. The only thing that this adds is that it makes the Internet a like a TV channel, from which you can set up something to record, and then watch it later. It's not *exactly* like a TV channel, but it still fits the DVR model.
The person/people who are creating this tech have got to pull off a trick. They've got to figure out how to make sure that the only content available is distributed with the permission of the copyright holder. If they can do that, then they have a much more credible case that this is not intended to be a tool which is intended for copyright violation.
I don't mean to suggest that copyright is a good thing. But it exists in today's world. It never ceases to amaze me when we (the slashdot crowd) get up in arms when someone violates the GPL (i.e. violates copyright) and then we turn around and violate copyright when it comes to music or movies or ... The point is that we can't ride whatever side of the fence is most convenient. Either copyright should be enforceable and we support others rights to enforce their copyrights or copyright should not be enforceable and we allow GPL violations without restriction. Which means that if we want a solid GPL, then we should also ensure that this tech does everything to respect other's copyrights.
$.02.
http torrent (Score:1)
(http://firsttube.com/)
Think about it: no more Slashdotting - just set your site up on a tracker the first time, and it's automagically covered under high load.
the name, man, the name (Score:1)
Freecache! (Score:2, Informative)
(http://www.asgeirnilsen.com/ | Last Journal: Friday October 01 2004, @06:48AM)
Only now it's too late, ofcourse..
Torrents + RSS + Readers (Score:1)
Now if there only was more feeds supporting torrents....
problem w/idea of a massive PVR/torrent system (Score:3, Insightful)
1. The inconvenience. As another poster indicated, BT downloads RANDOM chunks, so you'd have to wait until the entire file is downloaded until you can watch it.
2. The bandwidth. If this BT concept became as ubiquitous as PVR's will be in the future, the home ISPs would collectively have a heart attack. Now, I don't own my own ISP, but from what I understand just about all of them could never put up with every, or a significant amount, of their subscribers utilizing their upload amounts. They sell you those great 3mbit/1mbit (or whatever) lines, but if you consistently use the 1mbit line for WHATEVER reason, many ISPs (comcast anyone?) will automatically flag and cap you once you cross a data transfer amount (an amount they refuse to disclose to you). Granted, torrents are a great idea for spreading popular files, but it is a system that requires (or at least thrives on) people kicking back whatever they can into the system.
Anyone else see that as a serious problem?
Large-Scale Distribution System for Indie TV (Score:3, Interesting)
wow.... (Score:2)
(http://www.byopvr.com/)
*this* is why OSS and open standards and community/hacking innovation is soooo cool.
e.
Nucleus RSS/Bittorrent Aggregator (Score:2, Informative)
Broadcatching with BitTorrent (Score:5, Interesting)
(http://scottraymond.net/)
http://scottraymond.net/archive/4745 [scottraymond.net]
After addressing the initial whys and wherefores, I speculate on how the pairing might be potent enought to spark an indie media revolution. Here's the text:
-- RSS meets BitTorrent meets TiVo.
The other day, Steve Gillmor wrote about BitTorrent and RSS and how they could be combined to create a "disruptive revolution." He's half right. RSS and BT are indeed two great tastes that taste great together, but Gillmor's vision is upside down: we shouldn't use BitTorrent to carry RSS, we should use RSS to carry BitTorrent. Let me explain.
-- But first, some background.
RSS (RDF Site Summary) is a simple format for syndicating content on the web. These days, the most common application of RSS is subscribing to weblogs: you tell your computer to check an RSS file for changes every so often, and then it notifies you when there's something new to read. If you're like me and you read one metric shitload of news every day, this is a life-saver.
BitTorrent, the brainchild of Bram Cohen, is the current cool-kids' P2P program. It works sort of like Kazaa, but at a lower level. It doesn't handle searching for new files, it doesn't have a media player, it just concentrates on downloading big files efficiently.
Okay. Two solutions in search of a problem. Here's a problem:
-- I have a weakness.
I am addicted to the show Alias. I watched the first couple episodes of season two as it aired, and I was hooked. In my honest moments, I'll admit that the show's appeal is mostly due to the callipygian Jennifer Garner. It's a weakness; we deal.
But it gets worse. I go out on Sunday nights, when Alias airs, and I don't want to give that up. That's why God created the VCR, I know, but to compound the problem, I don't have TV. I don't want to have TV, because I love the feeling of superiority that I get by not having it.
This system is at tension, it has no rest, its forces are unbalanced, it wants to be resolved.
-- A partial answer.
The internet, it turns out, is great at resolving different kinds of tensions, and this is one of them. After a few weeks of missed episodes, I realized that with a little patience, a P2P program like Kazaa was able to fetch back-episodes with aplomb. Each file is around 450 megs, fairly high-quality video, with commercials cut out. I start a few episodes downloading, and by the next evening, they're ready to watch, whenever I have the time.
After a few weeks of enjoying this, a new tension emerged: I had caught up with all of the old episodes, and I had to wait a week for each new one. The problem is that the Kazaa protocol isn't especially well-tuned for getting brand new files: first someone has to record the show as it airs, cut out the commercials, and compress it to a reasonable size, then seed it on the network. Then, it has to slowly propagate to its peers, each transfer taking hours. It might take three days before it's available on enough peers that I'm able to even find it, let alone download it.
-- BitTorrent to the rescue.
The solution is BitTorrent. BitTorrent operates on similar principles to Kazaa, but it's tuned differently: it excels at downloading files that are new or currently in high demand. It breaks large files into many small chunks, and coordinates their assemblage, so that users can tap into a swarm and distribute the load evenly. At the same time that you're downloading a chunk, another user is downloading an earlier chunk from you -- no one server is overwhelmed, and the more popular a file, the higher its availability is. It's perfect for large files that are most interesting when they're fresh -- in other words, it's perfect for TV shows.
In many cases, I have been able to use BitTorrent to completely download a new TV show mere hours after the show airs.
Already been done. (Score:2, Informative)
(http://jason.sdf1.net/)
Python application, all platforms, searches RSS feeds and downloads the torrent.
WhiteWater BitTorrent's successor? (Score:2)
White Water allows people with limited or metered bandwidth to publish files for download by thousands of people without saturating their bandwidth. Downloaders participate by distributing chunks of the file amongst themselves but gain by downloading several parts of the file simultaneously. The download speed will generally be limited only by the downloaders own bandwidth, not that of the publisher.
White water can also be used in server or proxy mode, publishing and downloading files for entire networks whilst providing more permanent sharing of cached files.
It's touted as being more featurefull than Bit-Torrent. Anyone using WhiteWater?
ReplayTV's Poopli - 15,000 Shared Shows (Score:2)
(http://www.meehawl.com/Blogfiles/ | Last Journal: Thursday December 04 2003, @06:38PM)
I especially like... (Score:1)
(http://trog.qgl.org)
What was the point of referencing this? Aside from the obvious reason of trying to pretend this whole project isn't hugely illegal and going to attract even more negative attention from the mainstream press?
I'd like to think everyone that reads Slashdot is aware that technology isn't inherently evil, and that BitTorrent isn't an evil technology because people use it to distribute movies, but linking to legaltorrents.com - a site which has absolutely zero relevance to the subject matter - is lame. Just like to one of the many sites that are regularly updated with pirated TV feeds and get it over and done with - the waiting is killing me!
Add collaborative filtering to this! (Score:1)
(http://navelfluff.org/)
Now if you added collaborative filtering (see Amphetarate [sf.net]) we would have something infinitely cool. A TV viewer/recorder/broadcast station that "tivo-recommends" shows you'd want to see. Whoa.
~llauren
http://freshmeat.net/projects/torrentocracy (Score:1)
(http://www.lerhaupt.com/)
Torrentocracy.com is back up! (Score:1)
(http://www.lerhaupt.com/)