Cancer Survival for Software Developers 263
Paul Pareti writes "Doug Reilly has published an affecting, personal piece about Surviving Cancer if you're a Programmer. You don't have to be a sufferer to benefit from reading it, especially his conclusions, including the perspective-lengthening advice: 'Make sure you are not indispensable!'"
Wow (Score:3, Funny)
Wow. That just may be the first ever selfless good deed.
dispensible (Score:5, Informative)
Re:dispensible (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Wow (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Wow (Score:2)
No, but being indispensable is a safety precaution that many workers use to so that they wont become, well, dispensable. That, is selfish.
If you are indespensible.. (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:If you are indespensible.. (Score:5, Insightful)
There, fixed it for you.
Re:If you are indespensible.. (Score:4, Interesting)
Fixed it again. I'd rather do minimum wage grudge work than management.
Re:If you are indespensible.. (Score:4, Insightful)
1) He screws up, gets fired, then is "overqualified" for technical positions he subsequently applies for and ends up taking a $7/hour job.
or
2) He screws up, retains his job and even gets promoted, but is miserable as hell doing it. Eventually his company has to downsize (or goes under) due to poor management and he gets laid off.
Re:If you are indespensible.. (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:If you are indespensible.. (Score:3, Insightful)
I personally have no interest in doing the tech team manager job at my last place. It's a position for minimal project management, a lot of customer interfacing and zero tech oversight. All you're doing really is watching schedules and pushing numbers around on gantt chart.
On the other hand, you could quite legitimately call a technical architect the team manager. They're interfacing with the client and passing the work around their team, but they're passi
Re:If you are indespensible.. (Score:2, Insightful)
That doesn't just apply to cancer, either. It applies to diseases like MS, and even simply going out of business.
Re:If you are indespensible.. (Score:4, Funny)
I agree, Microsoft is a disease, and it keeps spreading.
And if you discover somebdy is indispensible... (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:If you are indespensible.. (Score:3, Funny)
Hmm (Score:5, Insightful)
Sure it sounds WRONG, but take a step back, and think about it. I'm going to die in 6 months, sorry ozzy/harriet daddy has to go take care of some stuff at the office, dont worry, i got 6 months left.
Unless ofcourse its Curable, which then, I would have to balance the two a little more carefuly.
Re:Hmm (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Hmm (Score:2)
I think this example amplifies your point. How is it that Bobby wasn't prepared? I don't mean this in a cruel or uncaring way, but I am quite sure that his employer's predicament didn't hinder his passing.
-Peter
Re:Hmm (Score:4, Insightful)
Part of preparing for death (assuming you get a chance to) involves talking about it with the important people in your life, and assuring yourself that those you leave behind are going to be OK. While your co-workers probably don't rank up there with your children and beloved partner in that respect, you may very well count them among your friends, and I know that I'd hate to leave my friends in the lurch if I could prevent it.
Re:Hmm (Score:2)
Here's the story of my coworker (Score:5, Interesting)
After he died, our team was devistated. I'm not sure we accomplished more than simple maintenance activities for months afterwards. Even though he'd tried to put things in order, it was still tremendously difficult to fill where he'd been. It probably took a good year before things felt on track again.
It's strange even now, running across his name in code or tucked away in a database somewhere. I support his few remaining applications, which some day will be retired as well. The things we leave behind . . .
Re:Hmm (Score:5, Insightful)
Yes it would be nice if you could sit around for 6 months. But it is selfish.
Re:Hmm (Score:2)
Spend some time with them, but it is not likely you could spend the whole day, all week days with them. You also need to distract yourself and avoid becoming bitter about life. Still continue to be creative.
When your kids are parents... (Score:2, Insightful)
I know, it's a balance that is required, but my wife and I have talked about it and we've decided if either of us gets hit with an illness like that, we'll sell the house, get a houseboat, and spend the remaining days as a family on a worldwide adventure. "irresponsible"? Maybe if you're idea of responsible is to be good little c
Re:Hmm (Score:3, Insightful)
If you don't have enough money in savings to sit around for six months, then you've over-extended yourself (or you're poor, but given that this is Slashdot, I'm assuming not). If we were talking about a couple years then you'd have a point, but you should always have at least a several month reserve of money lying around. It may not be cancer or illness that makes you need to use it, it could be a lay-off.
Re:Hmm (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Hmm (Score:3, Insightful)
No it doesn't. No-one goes to their death bed thinking "I wish I'd spent more time in the office..."; that's especially true when they go 30 or 40 years before their time.
If I have only a couple of months to live, then I'm sorry, I'd spend as much time as possible with family and friends. Project deadline? Devil take your client requirements, I have more important things to do and precious little time to do them in.
Work steals enough of our time as it is; don't let it take your final mom
Re:Hmm (Score:2)
What About Incurable Life? (Score:4, Insightful)
I know that to some extent you have to work to keep the symptoms of incurable life in check. Having to eat, having to have shelter, that sort of thing. But I think you should at least be doing something you like. To date I've known 3 guys who came down with cancer while working in the IT industry. They all kept working for as long as they were able to, not because they had to but because they wanted to. I think if I got cancer I'd want to keep working as long as possible as well. Admittedly I don't have much in the way of close family, though.
Re:Hmm (Score:5, Insightful)
Well, you do have a terminal disease. It's called aging. It'll get you sooner or later if the proverbial bus doesn't make it's appearance, so it's not a bad idea to keep your actual day to day activities a reasonably close reflection of what your real priorities are.
Re:Hmm (Score:5, Interesting)
I do this everyday and AFAIK I do not have cancer (Score:2, Insightful)
Yeah right (Score:4, Insightful)
I'm dying...UH OH, I'd better make sure all my code is documented. That's ridiculous.
Re:Yeah right (Score:2)
Wish I had mod points. I couldn't agree more.
Re:Yeah right (Score:2)
Re:Yeah right (Score:2)
Yes, but hopefully after the new Battlestar Galactica series finishes.
Then I can pass in peace.
Re:Yeah right (Score:5, Funny)
Boss: "Bob, this in a strange way, is very fortunate. Meet Rajii here from India. He was going to be replacing you anyway. Its a win-win!"
Re:Yeah right (Score:2, Insightful)
Also, I've never really bought the "I'd spend all my time with my kids" argument. For one thing, there isn't that muc
This should be standard practice (Score:5, Insightful)
* Make certain that source code is where it should be.
* Clearly document anything "strange" in the source code you deliver. .
* Make certain you have a "buddy" developer who knows what you are doing.
If nothing else, the first two are essential if you want to read your _own_ source code after a year or two's time and figure out what is going on.
Re:This should be standard practice (Score:5, Interesting)
My fellow seniors and I have a little rule where I work - if it's not in CVS, it doesn't exist. Nothing gets deployed to a server that isn't in source control. Hard drives die, things are deleted by accident, and developer PCs are not backed up. The CVS server is (or should be - if it isn't, at least we are blameless if the shit hits the fan).
* Clearly document anything "strange" in the source code you deliver.
That's just common courtesy if nothing else. If you think something is odd while you're writing it, imagine how it's going to look to someone else coming to it cold. I've lost count of the time I've seen wasted (and have wasted myself) investigating weirdness in code, or even removing things that look completely wrong only to have something break subtley in an apparently unrelated area.
* Make certain you have a "buddy" developer who knows what you are doing.
This one I'm much less bothered about. However, that may be because I tend to actively discourage any concept of code ownership. It's not *my* code, it's the $feature code. If someone else needs to get in there in the course of their work, all the better - they may catch a mistake I've made, or a bad assumption. Even if it's perfect, it's one more person who knows the code. I think that ideally everyone on a team of developers should get stuck in to pretty much every module. It's rare (in my experience at least) that any part of an application is so specialised as to only be within the ability of a single team member.
Re:This should be standard practice (Score:2, Funny)
Or for my favourite variation on this, spend ages investigating the weirdness, trying to clean it out whilst complainin
Incurable cancer business plan (Score:5, Insightful)
2. Sell house, possessions.
3. Move to tropical island paradise.
4. When the pain sets in - gun to head.
5. Afterlife????
You forgot step six... (Score:5, Funny)
Re:You forgot step six... (Score:2)
Re:You forgot step six... (Score:2)
Re:You forgot step six... (Score:4, Funny)
Re:You forgot step six... (Score:2)
Re:Incurable cancer business plan (Score:2)
Facing death... (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Facing death... (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Facing death... (Score:5, Interesting)
That's why the games industry holds no interest for me- I'm a pretty decent 3D modeller but you couldn't pay me enough money to sell every waking hour to EA. Especially on a sequel. Until they all grow up I'm not going to touch them with a bargepole.
Re:Facing death... (Score:2)
Re:Facing death... (Score:2)
1)An old friend die. I had to take 2 days off to fly cross country for the funeral
2)My grandmother die. I missed a solid week to sit shiva, this was 3 days before my project was due to release.
3)My father have a heart attack. I had to go home to take care of my mother, and waited until after my father's surgery (which was further delayed to let his heart strengthen a bit).
I never got any shit for missing the time. I never had more than a day'
Most everyone nowadays is dispensable (Score:4, Insightful)
Well, if you are dying, you may have other priorities in your last days. The above quote might be relevant if you own or run a company, but not for the average Joe.
Most people would not think twice about quitting their boring jobs and actually try to enjoy the last hours of their lives.
Well... (Score:3)
Doug's first cancer was curable (as it was contained only in his liver and is completely gone after the tumor was removed.)
His second is treatable, and he may live as long as 10 years.
I don't know about you, but I can't spend 10 years with my family. I would need to work to have a bit of money, especially for these cancer treatments.
Now were it terminal, I'd tie up loose ends and get the hell out of dodge. But if I saw a lot of hope in hanging on for
Re:Most everyone nowadays is dispensable (Score:5, Informative)
Yeah, but the article isn't aimed at people who are actively dying. It's aimed at people who probably aren't going to die, but do have a better chance than the average person under 50 years old.
Cancer Shmancer (Score:2)
Well, not really. But I certainly would be more worried about myself than about how I could arrange for my clients to keep making money. The only reason you want your clients to make money is so that they will then have to give some of that money to you in the form of your fees. Beyond that they can go fly a kite.
Re:Cancer Shmancer (Score:3, Insightful)
This is not for people who are actively dying.... (Score:5, Insightful)
Of course you would. If you were currently dying of cancer. He says very clearly that if your case is terminal, that's what you should do. The article isn't for those people
It's for people with either curable cancer, or cancer that is long-term treatable (will likely kill you in the next decade, but you'll be fine for at least a few more years). People in those situations can't afford to quit work entirely (not with those Dr bills, trust me!), and in all likelyhood shouldn't give up their normal lives. But it does mean that they have a better-than-average chance of dying, and should probably take a few precautions just in case.
Yes, if you hate your job, hopefully something like that would be a wake-up call to change your situation. But if you're fine with your job, and are most likely not dying anytime soon, quitting is not necessarily the obvious solution.
Don't take this the wrong way, but... (Score:2, Interesting)
I'm just stating my opinion here, but it's talking about living life from the wrong end of the spectrum. For one things, one of the first things that came to my mind when I read it was, "Get a freakin life!!" If a person is so concerned about what will happen to them after they die, then they should really re-evaluate the way they live. I live my life in such a way that if I had to be replaced because of death, people wouldn't think, "Oh I wish he had left us the pa
Awkward Article (Score:5, Insightful)
Here is how it works... You get diagnosed with cancer and then you freakin' forget ANYTHING about work. Period. I don't frickin' care if you are the president or Sheryl Crow. You take care of yourself and your family. Managing your work is just below the bottom of any priority or list you may have.
Been there, done that with too many family members and others in our support network. The article is pure sci-fi/fantasy/victim-hood non-sense. I don't think that in my life that I have ever been offended by anything, but the editor who put this on Slashdot is getting pretty close to being the first to do so.
Re:Awkward Article (Score:5, Insightful)
Unless, like the author says, your cancer is treatable and you know most likely won't be dying anytime soon. I continued in grad school (both classes and a research assistantship) full-time while I was getting chemo and radiation. My family wanted me to move back with them (1000 miles away), but I knew that would be completely stupid in my case. I only had about a 20% (or less) chance of dying, but if I'd quit school and done that I would have had a 100% chance of severe depression, which is shown to reduce surivial rates. Not to mention losing my insurance, which would mean that once I was done with treatment I'd probably have to declare bankruptcy, and boy would THAT make the next few years of my life more fun.
Over all, there was no way in hell I was going to let cancer dictate my life. Now, if the initial treatment hadn't worked, and my chances got significantly lower, needed a bone marrow transplant, etc - then I would have pretty much had to quit, and would have gone back to be with my family. But that didn't happen, and my family eventually realized I'd made the right decision.
Dying of cancer and having cancer are two very different situations, and have to be dealt with very differently. It's also the kind of thing that's totally different for different people - I was able to take 3 classes and work 10-20 hours a week during chemo, some people on the same regimen aren't able to. I liked what I was doing a lot; others who don't like their job may see it as more of a nuisance during treatment, or may not have supervisors as understanding and flexible as mine.
I don't know what your current situation is, but I hope that your treatment is going well. And I hope that you're only letting cancer tell you what to do when you absolutely have to.
Re:Awkward Article (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Awkward Article (Score:2)
Yeah, maybe I should. It actually wasn't worth responding to at all.
Re:Awkward Article (Score:3, Interesting)
[shrug] Not everyone reacts to cancer, or any other life-changing (and potentially life-ending) event, the same way. When my mother was diagnosed with breast cancer, she told the people she thought needed to know, and kept on living her life exactly the same as she had before the diagnosis. She worked right up until the day before her surgery, and was back at work,
Even if you're dying... (Score:3, Insightful)
A lot of posts, yours included, seem to have this mythical concept that you can simply drop everything and gather your family to your side for all your remaining days. Well, guess what? You can't. Why? Because they have lives too. Your kids can't drop oiut of school, your wife is going to need to keep up with her job (she'll be the family's only source of income after you die) Hell, maybe your ass needs to put in a little more work to pay of
Cancer (Score:2)
But here it's cancer or more explicit death. A student I knew suffered liver cancer and did not write a testament. He died three yrs ago. So his property went to the Government and his friend (he was homosexual) had to move out of his flat.
The advice the adeveloper gives to us is very intresting and should apply to all of us. Truck numbers of projects have to be kept low (A truck number is
Re:Cancer (Score:2)
Why does it take impending death ? (Score:5, Insightful)
Every day you go to work before your child gets up and get home after they've gone to sleep is a day that you both lose. Every saturday you spend getting those TPS reports done is another day of play and growth that you will miss with your child.
An earlier poster said that they would spend the time making sure that their kids know what they need to. That kinda implies they aren't doing it now. People say that they would spend the time with their family.
Maybe I've got the wrong end of the stick - maybe you already do that. But to me, every day I live is one day closer to the end of my life. I only work to make sure that I can keep my family safe, warm, healthy and educated. Once I've worked enough to make that happen, the rest of the time is for them, because each day is one less day that I have to share with them.
Re:Why does it take impending death ? (Score:2)
You never know what's going to happen so living in the now is the only way to go. My priorities (as someone unlikely to die soon) are:
1. Family
2. Health
3. Work
You're dying right now -- what are you going to do about it?
Re:Why does it take impending death ? (Score:2)
Good school districts are expensive, good neighborhoods are expensive, houses that dont leak all the heat like a screen door are expensive. All of those things require a job where the employer either treats you like dirt and works you 10+ hours a day and usually requires you live 1+ hours away
Re:Why does it take impending death ? (Score:2)
So, why exactly are you wasting time here on Slashdot instead of revelling in family bliss?
Re:Why does it take impending death ? (Score:2)
My first response is "Screw 'em"... (Score:4, Insightful)
Employers will dump you in a nanosecond if the finance number crunch that way, and they will not in the least be concerned with
Why should I be concerned about theirs?
Re:My first response is "Screw 'em"... (Score:2, Interesting)
br> I work for a government contracting company in which business can be volatile if we lose a contract. For instance, I was slated to work on a massive $300 million contract 2 years ago, but we lost it to Lockheed Martin. A lot of people thought they would lose their jobs, but the company has an internal research and development (IRAD) budget, so everyone was moved to research until permanent spots could be found. I was bounced between two different IRADs before I was placed on a
My thoughts on work and death... (Score:4, Insightful)
I work on an internal system at a large company that's mission critical to our core business. Five people in the history of the company have worked on it - two moved on, one died, and there are two of us left. He's a private pilot, I'm a suicidal driver, and we spend quite a bit of time together outside of work. The question comes up regularly, "What if you guys get hit by a bus?"
My answer: Then I'm dead, I no longer give a @#$^.
Cancer comments (Score:5, Insightful)
My mother died of breast cancer 6 years ago. She was diagnosed in her mid/late 50s and insisted that we not tell anyone. She didn't want to be viewed or treated differently. When her cancer recurred, her doctor called it "terminal recurring breast cancer" and gave her 6 months to a year to live. She lived 8 more years after the reappearance and died of cancer at age 80.
When first diagnosed and for most of the time following that the web didn't exist but she did take advantage of other resources like medical libraries. Research is important as the author attests. Equally important, however, is finding the right experts.
My mother saw one doctor who, after a cursory exam and x-ray viewing, declared that the cancer had spread and had eaten away part of her ribs and said, "come back next week and we'll start chemo". No discussion of options (other than joining a statistical study the Dr. was involved in). She saw another doctor who spent some time on the case. She saw the same x-rays and patient but was able to determine that the darkness on the x-ray was not due to "dissolved ribs" but due to dense soft-tissue blocking the x-ray and that the range-of-motion issues were due to the tumor. A couple months of Tamoxifen and the tumor had shrunk to golf-ball size and was removed with relative ease. The range-of-motion issues started easing within a couple weeks of starting Tamoxifen.
Also, don't get complacent. My mother had a mastectomy so she didn't think cancer when she started having discomfort raising her arm on that side. She assumed that if she did get cancer it would be on the remaining breast. Wrong. If you have cancer, be extra careful about continuing checkups even after you are "cured".
My dad got prostate cancer which was discovered due to urinary symptoms. Routine screening wasn't done at that time and through careful research and good medicine he lived 13 more years. He died last year at age 76. With earlier detection he might still be with us.
So for the rest of us, get those exams. I'm in my 40s but get regular PSA and prostate checks due to the family history. I also get a full body check for skin-cancer every couple years (from birth to age 18 I lived in the Mojave desert sun with my hair turning white and my skin turning brown every summer - we didn't know from sunscreen back then). When I turn 50 I'll probably be first in line for the colonoscopy. If I do get cancer, I want to catch it early.
With all due respect (Score:4, Interesting)
To put it bluntly - who gives a flying fig about employers convenience, when life and health of individual are at stake. If only a few years are left for one to live, it is far better to spend them with loved ones or doing something that is important to the person (or makes a difference to the world, or both) then wasting your time writing useless code for someone's profit. Unless of course this happens to be "what is important to that person" - and then I would strongly suggest reviewing priorities, while there is still time.
Pretending that there is such a thing as "work ethics" and "loyalty" on part of employees when nothing is given or guaranteed by employers is both silly and dangerous.
What A Jackass! (Score:2, Interesting)
If you are reading this article, I strongly suggest you read the following before listening to anything at all this guy has to offer, especially his request that you "look for another job". That is completely ludicrous.
Questions and Answers Abou [eeoc.gov]
Maybe not the Employer's biggest concern (Score:2, Funny)
Very well said (Score:4, Insightful)
Don't get me wrong, I don't really care what my company does or doesn't do after I'm gone, but I have some great friends here and I do care quite a bit about them. I wouldn't want to suddenly drop tons of work on them when I know a 10 minute conversation or copying code would have saved the day.
Perhaps it's a bit selfish, but I would like to leave the impression when I'm gone that "Yeah, he was a great guy" rather than "He was a great guy, but now we're screwed". I try not to leave projects unfinished and I see no reason why my career as a whole needs to be any different.
Confirmation (Score:2)
Many Americans will chose to give their qhole lives over to their company even at a cost to their family and own personal lives. (e.g. giving up weekends to go into the office even without anyone telling them to). It seems to me that either most Americans are crazily work-addicted or possibly too scared to risk being perceived as non-conformis
Re:Confirmation (Score:2)
I'm one of those Programming Cancer-Types (Score:5, Informative)
Re:I'm one of those Programming Cancer-Types (fmt) (Score:2)
I'm glad to see another survivor that didn't give up work for treatments. I couldn't have, I would have been horrifically depressed if I had. I was in grad school, and I LOVED what I was studying. Quitting would have just added insult to injury for me. Not to mention losing my insurance, which would have been very, very bad. Even with insurance, I'm still negotiating the $20K left on my oncologist's bill. But mainly becau
Re:I'm one of those Programming Cancer-Types (fmt) (Score:2)
I kept a blog (my slashdot username at deadjournal, if you're interested - complete with hair-falling-out pics) because my family was so far away and it was an easy way to keep them updated. But yeah, typing is harder than I expected when you're wiped from chemo. Playing video games is much easier. I wa
We are ALL terminal in some form or another (Score:2)
In my opinion, we should ALWAYS live our lives as if we will die anyday. Knowing (or thinking) that you have a fixed endpoint doesn't seem that much different.
So it seems to me that we should always handle our job skills (not to mentio
Hospice nurse's perspective.... (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Hospice nurse's perspective.... (Score:5, Insightful)
I think that this is the whole point that so many people are missing. I kept working/going to school during chemo because I loved what I did, and not doing it would depress me enough to interfere with my treatment. If I were some corporate drone with a job I hated, then I probably would have taken it as a sign to get out - but luckily, I've worked hard since high school to make sure I'm never in that position. I know what kind of impact I want to have on the world, I know how I want to get there, and I love everything about it. So cancer had no effect on my career plans whatsoever - although it did cause me to make one decision in my personal life that I would not have made otherwise, that did slightly affect my career. But only slightly.
Some people do need to keep working through treatments, and working a sucky job during treatment would just make a bad situation worse.
If you don't love what you're doing, don't wait for cancer to get out of it. Just like people are saying that you should comment your code whether you're dying or not - you should actively pursue a career that you would MISS if you had to give it up for chemo, whether or not that chemo is imminent.
Don't get hit by a bus (Score:4, Insightful)
Article is more about things to do to keep clients (Score:2)
cancer and the IT workplace (Score:5, Interesting)
Face it, people are selfish! (Score:3, Interesting)
Very human attitude. Granted. But it's what you leave behind that defines you as a person. We, as coders, are in a very bad position for that. Whatever we leave behind at work has, at best, a lifespan of a few years. If what we leave behind is "alive" 10 years after we're gone, it's most likely very obsolete code. I mean, think back about 10 years, consider the code you developed back then and ponder how much of said code is still productive.
Hardly any.
Some of us have a family. And if you have one, then yes, fu.. work, spend time with them. That's what you're gonna leave behind.
But from my point of view, I don't have a family. I won't have one. I don't really have that much money to leave some kind of foundation behind. What I have is my knowledge and my experience. Of both, I have lots, I dare say.
So my last plan would be to pass this on.
You're dying, and you worry about code? (Score:3, Interesting)
All developers should do this.
Here's my advice for developers who find themselves with a terminal illness:
(1) Stop using a computer, and give all your source code/documents to your closest coworkers.
(2) Sell all your posessions.
(3) Pick a country where global economical differentials and exchange rates make your couple hundred thousand dollars a huge amount of usable capital.
(4) Move there.
(5) Start a business you can do in the sunlight, smelling a nearby ocean breeze, hopefully. Or simply live off the money you saved.
(6) Really, just _don't_ use your computer anymore.
That's my advice.
Go on with life (Score:5, Insightful)
After surgery to remove the primary tumor, I was faced with chemotherapy and a 50% chance of dying within two years. My first reaction was like many of yours: give up work and move home to be close to family and friends. Or, pack up and travel the world with my remaining days.
But then I realized that giving up work and moving home would be depressing. I'd just be a cancer victim sitting around, waiting to die. It's hard to have any more good times in such a grim situation.
And traveling the world wouldn't be much fun either. One of the problems when you're sick with cancer is that you don't feel good. It's not like the doctor says "you have two weeks to live" after which you feel fine for two weeks and then pass away in your sleep. No, when the end is that close it's a struggle just to stay comfortable and enjoy things like food and warmth. So traveling the world would mean feeling crappy in a foreign land surrounded by strangers.
So I decided that I liked where I was in my life and would keep doing what I liked doing. That meant continuing to work, continuing to meet new people, continuing to learn things and watch movies and play games. That meant trying to be a person plus cancer, rather than a person destroyed by cancer. Sure, my perspective changed. I straightened out my personal relationships and felt freer to express my own quirky personality.
Continuing with normal things helped me to survive chemotherapy and more surgeries. And with the help of a great employer and coworkers I continued to be productive -- a little bit on bad days and a lot on good days -- and feel good about myself. The benefit of working with computers was that I could be productive from home and the computer would wait patiently when I was hit with a bout of nausea or fatigue.
These days I'm feeling fine but I know that any day the cancer could rear its ugly head again. My motto is to go on with life as if you have two years to live. Don't panic and drop everything and curl up on the couch. But remember that you don't have forever to do the things you want to do.
AlpineR
Re:Got that one covered .... (Score:2)
Re:Got that one covered .... (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:Got that one covered .... (Score:2)
Re:Got that one covered .... (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Agree to an extent (Score:4, Informative)
Well, yes. I think his point is that there are cancers that are not considered to be curable, as in the vast majority of patients are not cured - but even most of these do have a cure rate of 5-10%. So even if it's "not curable" it actually is occasionally curable. Just not usually curable. I'm not sure there is any cancer with a 0% cure rate, but it might exist.