Slashdot Log In
SQL on Rails Launched
Posted by
CowboyNeal
on Sat Apr 01, 2006 01:02 PM
from the web-three-point-oh dept.
from the web-three-point-oh dept.
Daniel writes "Developers have created a new Rails framework for SQL, SQL on Rails. Check out the screen cast that shows you how to develop an internet search engine with three lines of code. Version 4.1 of the SQL on Rails framework is available for download on the site, and the O'Reilly title is expected to hit shelves next month." ZOMG L@@K at the kitten site it powers!@#!11
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
really insightful (Score:5, Informative)
I wouldn't have thought, but... (Score:4, Funny)
Yes, but... (Score:1)
(Last Journal: Wednesday October 27 2004, @10:41AM)
Awesome, but can it run on an Intel Mac? (Score:5, Funny)
(http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/ | Last Journal: Tuesday September 11, @05:30PM)
Re:Awesome, but can it run on an Intel Mac? (Score:5, Funny)
(http://lucernesys.com/)
Stop Visiting SQLonRails.org (Score:5, Funny)
The only SQL you really need (Score:4, Funny)
(http://spanishcow.com/)
Re:The only SQL you really need (Score:4, Funny)
It would be awesome (Score:1)
(http://scwizard.livejournal.com/ | Last Journal: Friday January 13 2006, @08:59PM)
Then at midnight everything went back to normal.
Woe is me (Score:2, Funny)
(http://www.scenepointblank.com/)
Here's the source code for Google.com! (Score:2)
That's it. SQL on rails is awesome.
Actually, SQL needs to be on rails. (Score:4, Funny)
(http://members.cox.net/jmccorm)
Rails help to keep SQL on the tracks and to prevent queries from running unrestrained against a database. With rails, you don't have to worry about unsafe queries against your database. Everything is tightly controlled, and you can have a simple three line search engine without a great deal of overhead that normally goes into all of that normalization, checking, deadlock prevention, etc etc.
Finally! I'm waiting for HTML on Rails next!
Neat, but necessary? (Score:1)
Seems handy, but stuff like this really shouldn't be oversimplified. Since when has the "view" and "controller" been considered unimportant?
MS-DOS terminal (Score:3)
(http://www.jory.org/)
Please make the hurting stop. (Score:1)
3 lines of code is bloatware! (Score:1)
(http://www.google.com/)
print "Results not found";
OMG RAILS iS TEh SUK (Score:4, Funny)
Learn SQL First! (Score:1)
4.1? (Score:1)
(http://webtrotter.com/blog)
APRIL FOOLS! (Score:1)
(http://likeicare.net/)
This isn't exactly a joke... (Score:4, Informative)
CREATE OR REPLACE PROCEDURE hello_world IS
begin
htp.print('<html>');
htp.print('<head>');
htp.print('<title>HTP.PRINT Example...</title>');
htp.print('</head>');
htp.print('<body>');
htp.print('<h1>Hello, World!<h1>');
htp.print('</body>');
htp.print('</html>');
end;
This technology was sold as the premier way to write web apps for many years. Universities taught CS students to code with this, consultants in dark suits charged $150+ an hour to develop with it, and corporate clients paid tens of thousands of dollars per instance. I sincerely wish I was joking.
The screencast was funny (Score:2, Informative)
TextMate (Score:1)
Re:It's getting old (Score:2)
Re:Fix (Score:1)
(http://www.mrshoe.org/)
Pickles! (Score:1, Offtopic)
(http://thedark.jabberwocky.ca/ | Last Journal: Friday September 21, @09:29PM)
TEE HEE!
Re:Who else thinks... (Score:2)
(Personally I am waiting for QBasic on Rails.)
Re:Screencast contains a virus? (Score:1)
Plus, based on the actual video it was made on a mac. Everyone knows they can't get viruses