Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Yahoo! Launches Python Developer Center

Posted by ScuttleMonkey on Wed Aug 09, 2006 11:06 AM
from the snakes-on-a-page dept.
SimonW writes "Yahoo! has launched a Python Developer Center as part of their Developer Network. The new site explains how to access Yahoo!'s many web service APIs using Python, and includes tutorials on using Python with REST, JSON, XML and RSS. The site joins Yahoo!'s existing developer centers for PHP and JavaScript."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold:
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • Javascript (Score:5, Insightful)

    by kevin_conaway (585204) on Wednesday August 09 2006, @11:13AM (#15874501)
    (http://pyscrabble.sf.net/)

    Python developer, I think this is great. I'm glad that Python is gaining more acceptance.

    If the quality is on par with their Javascript library, we're in for a real treat

  • Whython (Score:3, Interesting)

    by CopaceticOpus (965603) on Wednesday August 09 2006, @11:21AM (#15874546)
    It's pretty cool of Yahoo to provide so much to the dev community. It's definitely improved my feelings about the company.

    I wonder why they've made this foray into the Python world? I know they decided to focus on PHP a few years back. Did they find some tasks were easier to accomplish in Python? Or are they simply trying to reach out to another developer community?
    • 2004 by booch (Score:2) Wednesday August 09 2006, @01:03PM
    • Re:Whython by carlivar (Score:3) Wednesday August 09 2006, @03:12PM
    • Re:Whython by maxume (Score:1) Wednesday August 09 2006, @06:37PM
    • Re:Here's to progress by Aladrin (Score:2) Wednesday August 09 2006, @11:53AM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • How refreshing! (Score:1, Interesting)

    by y5 (993724) on Wednesday August 09 2006, @11:22AM (#15874550)
    (http://yellow5.us/)

    Every time I see a story about Yahoo concerning developers, it's exactly what I want to hear. While their competitors are saying "do no evil", Yahoo seems to be living it.

    I don't know if I'm quite there yet, but my hard-to-break habit of Googling everything might be worth breaking if this kind of developer-focused attitude from Yahoo continues like it has. It's at least very tempting.

    • Re:How refreshing! (Score:4, Funny)

      by Daytona955i (448665) <flynnguy24@@@yahoo...com> on Wednesday August 09 2006, @11:30AM (#15874613)
      Yes, because it's not like google [google.com] has anything like this [google.com] available. [google.com]
      [ Parent ]
    • Re:How refreshing! by LnxAddct (Score:3) Wednesday August 09 2006, @11:33AM
      • Re:How refreshing! (Score:5, Interesting)

        by y5 (993724) on Wednesday August 09 2006, @11:46AM (#15874733)
        (http://yellow5.us/)

        What Yahoo is doing is great, but you're not giving Google nearly enough credit.

        You might be right. But I've had the chance to use the Web API's for Yahoo, Google, and MSN. Yahoo's Web Search API has been much easier to use than Google's or MSN's. I know there are many other API's to use than just web search, but I've been impressed with what I've seen from Yahoo, more so than from the others.

        Direction is everything, and you have to admit Yahoo has been moving in the right direction lately. Here's to hoping they don't lose focus of what's giving them such good publicity! =)

        [ Parent ]
    • Re:How refreshing! by rainman_bc (Score:2) Wednesday August 09 2006, @02:23PM
    • Re:FIXED by Chapter80 (Score:2) Wednesday August 09 2006, @01:22PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Yawn. (Score:2, Funny)

    by JoeyLemur (10451) on Wednesday August 09 2006, @11:25AM (#15874580)
    (http://www.visi.com/~epowell)
    Wake me when they create a Ruby/Rails section.

    Guido! Let my whitespace go!
    • Re:Yawn. by Anonymous Coward (Score:3) Wednesday August 09 2006, @11:26AM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Whitespace (Score:5, Insightful)

      by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 09 2006, @12:05PM (#15874893)

      I know everybody gets hung up on the whitespace thing when they look at Python. But you know what? Once you start actually coding in it for any significant amount of time, it's not a big deal. When you first start, I know you expect it to be really annoying, but that simply doesn't turn out to be the case. The supposed problem evaporates.

      Every time you hear anybody moan about Python's significant whitespace, ask them how long they've spent actually writing Python. You'll see the same thing as I do - that virtually everybody complaining has never given Python a chance, and that virtually everybody who has given Python a chance has realised that the significant whitespace isn't a big deal.

      [ Parent ]
      • Re:Whitespace by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Wednesday August 09 2006, @01:47PM
        • Re:Whitespace by Peaker (Score:2) Wednesday August 09 2006, @06:08PM
          • Re:Whitespace by bhaberman (Score:2) Wednesday August 09 2006, @11:09PM
            • Re:Whitespace by idlemachine (Score:2) Thursday August 10 2006, @02:05AM
            • Re:Whitespace by Ian Bicking (Score:2) Thursday August 10 2006, @02:24PM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:Yawn. by twocents (Score:1) Wednesday August 09 2006, @12:11PM
    • Re:Yawn. by thryllkill (Score:2) Wednesday August 09 2006, @11:32AM
      • Re:Yawn. by Black Perl (Score:2) Wednesday August 09 2006, @03:35PM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Howto (Score:4, Informative)

    by kevin_conaway (585204) on Wednesday August 09 2006, @11:35AM (#15874651)
    (http://pyscrabble.sf.net/)

    Furthermore, unlike their previous offerings, they have released little new code here. The only code they have released is an API to their search engine. The rest seem to be HOWTOs on how to python to access their services.

    Still good info though. Thanks

  • Value of their feeds? (Score:4, Interesting)

    by halosfan (691623) on Wednesday August 09 2006, @11:42AM (#15874709)
    (http://rodyakin.com/)

    While browsing through this, I noticed the following in ther Weather RSS feed page:

    The feeds are provided free of charge for use by individuals and non-profit organizations for personal, non-commercial uses.

    and then

    Yahoo! also reserves the right to require you to cease distributing these feeds at any time for any reason.

    So, while it's cool and all, is there any value to using their weather RSS feed (and I assume it's similar with other services), beyond my ability to play with them? I mean, even I'm not making any money off it, presumably, if I put the effort in accessing those feeds, I expect them to be available to me in the future? Or do they provide a paid-for version for this?

    • Re:Value of their feeds? by kevin_conaway (Score:2) Wednesday August 09 2006, @11:46AM
    • Re:Value of their feeds? (Score:4, Insightful)

      by 0racle (667029) on Wednesday August 09 2006, @11:59AM (#15874835)
      I expect them to be available to me in the future
      Why? It's their service, they could stop it or move it to a pay service at any time. Guess what, anyone providing a free service could do that even (gasp) Google. They could make GMail a pay service tomorrow if they felt like it.

      Your expectations seem to be ever so slightly unrealistic.
      [ Parent ]
  • Great, and good packages (Score:5, Informative)

    by masklinn (823351) <{slashdot.org} {at} {masklinn.net}> on Wednesday August 09 2006, @12:20PM (#15875030)

    Not only did they release a nice guide, but the guide is actually good: while the first XML library they talk about in XML parsing is xml.dom.minidom, they also explain how to use the XML API with effbot's ElementTree (and link to both ElementTree and cElementTree), which is more than likely the best Python XML library. And the recommend UFP (Universal Feed Parser) for RSS parsing.

    The worst thing you can say about them is that they did their homework, kudos to the Yahoo guys.

  • Snakes are naturally quiet (Score:2, Interesting)

    by suitepotato (863945) on Wednesday August 09 2006, @02:28PM (#15876013)
    I'm just glad they did this ahead of any Ruby foray. Online, all I hear anymore is loud rowdy Ruby peope and anti-Python people, some of whom are the same. At the bookstore, I easily see two times more Python books than Ruby. This tells me that despite the online hype, there's still a lot of quiet interest in Python and it isn't that Ruby or anything else is pushing us aside, it's that we're not very vociferous.

    Which is fine with me. As long as Yahoo and other outlets keep that in mind that is. Python is not dead no matter what some people want to believe from the SNR.
  • by DrDitto (962751) on Wednesday August 09 2006, @02:29PM (#15876022)
    Its sort of ironic that Guido van Rossum, the creator of Python, now works at Yahoo's competitor (Google) [slashdot.org].
  • Excellent news (Score:1)

    by DrGalaxy (89127) on Wednesday August 09 2006, @04:50PM (#15876915)
    (http://www.locallinux.com/)
    This page mainly demonstrates how to take advantage of Yahoo's APIs with Python. I think that the engineers and managers at Yahoo must be paying attention to the competative edge in productivity that Python can offer. It really is an all purpose programming tool that works well in many niches.
  • by abigor (540274) on Wednesday August 09 2006, @11:46AM (#15874734)
    You're in luck! Here's a quote from Guido: "Maybe my spiritual beliefs shine through here -- I'm a convinced atheist."

    I don't know anything about Ruby's creator, but Larry Wall has always creeped me out too. I sure was happy when Python came along - a sensible language created by a logical Dutchman.
    [ Parent ]
  • Re:Now Ruby! (Score:1)

    by Slaimus (697294) on Wednesday August 09 2006, @11:55AM (#15874810)
    The whole point of a web service is that it is language-neutral. There is nothing preventing you from using Ruby or any other language that can take advantage of web services. Just look at the WSDL and make use of it.
    [ Parent ]
  • Product Placement (Score:2)

    by RobertB-DC (622190) * on Wednesday August 09 2006, @12:01PM (#15874850)
    (http://www.dixie-chicks.com/ | Last Journal: Tuesday July 24, @05:17PM)
    The great and mighty Anonymous wrote:
    Launch...?
    Python....?
    Snakes on a Plane!!!


    Yep, it's another Product Placement deal. Pretty shameless -- all the searches shown in the movie start at yahoo.com, and yahoo.com plugs the movie right down to the programmer level. Pitiful.
    [ Parent ]
  • by swartze (668002) on Wednesday August 09 2006, @02:11PM (#15875903)
    As an atheist, I'd like to stick to a language created by an atheist
    Wow, That's quite a religious conviction you've got there.
    [ Parent ]
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • by amightywind (691887) on Wednesday August 09 2006, @02:19PM (#15875955)
    (Last Journal: Friday December 08 2006, @04:42PM)
    As an atheist, I'd like to stick to a language created by an atheist.

    You are narrowing your options considering who [stallman.org] who developed the initial versions of GCC.

    [ Parent ]
  • As an atheist, I'd like to stick to a language created by an atheist.
    Then Faith Based Programming [kuro5hin.org] must not be for you. Quote:
    When I begin to code, I stop trying to follow the rules and logic of my own experience over the years. Instead I allow the divine spirit take my hand and control the code that is written.
    [ Parent ]
  • by Anonymous Coward on Thursday August 10 2006, @05:59AM (#15879303)
    What does religion have to do with programming languages? As a _true_ atheist you should care about this particular point.
    I'm an atheist too, and the point is to keep our minds open and willing to accept and change our thoughts.
    You cannot ignore other people just because of their religion, that is not what an atheist stands for, we are against those lines of thinking.

    Would you not take your medication if you found it it was invented by a religious person?
    [ Parent ]
  • Atheism IS a religion.

    A religion is a belief system.

    LK
    [ Parent ]
  • 6 replies beneath your current threshold.