XLANG Specification

Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

XLANG Specification 6

Posted by michael on Tuesday August 07, 2001 @11:34AM from the XML-for-fun-and-profit,-mostly-profit dept.

mdlm writes: "SOAP guru Satish Thatte has published the XLANG spec, a business process messaging specification. This extends Microsoft's SOAP/.NET standardization efforts."

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

XLANG Specification

Load All Comments

Search 6 Comments Log In/Create an Account

Comments Filter:

Standardization ? (Score:1)

by SirGeek ( 120712 ) writes:

Get real.. This is a public front for them.. The "goodies" will be obscured like everything else they do...
- Re:Standardization ? (Score:1)
  
  by joe-cecil ( 325576 ) writes:
  
  Just ignore M$ 'standards'. IBM, although a massive co., seems to actually care about open business standards and does a hell of a lot more to support them.
  For open, supported process management wait for
  IBM WSFL [ibm.com]
  - - Re:Standardization ? (Score:1)
      
      by joe-cecil ( 325576 ) writes:
      
      sounds like a good business relationship. :)
I have this recursive nightmare (Score:1, Funny)

by Anonymous Coward writes:

I dream that I embrace and extend technologies, thereby putting other companies out of business and improving my situation. However, in my dream I seem to have embraced and extended my own technology. I can't wake up and I can't get free. I'm forced to embrace and extend each new technology that I have embraced and extended. What can I do?

There may be more comments in this discussion. Without JavaScript enabled, you might want to turn on Classic Discussion System in your preferences instead.

XLANG Specification 6

XLANG Specification More Login

XLANG Specification

Standardization ? (Score:1)

Re:Standardization ? (Score:1)

Re:Standardization ? (Score:1)

I have this recursive nightmare (Score:1, Funny)

Related Links Top of the: day, week, month.

Slashdot Top Deals

Slashdot