Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive


Forgot your password?

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).

Java Programming

Java Media Framework Drops MP3 186

Posted by chrisd
from the more-ammo-for-ogg dept.
realinvalidname writes "Sun had stopped downloads of its Java Media Framework about a week ago due to an undisclosed 'licensing issue.' Now we know what it is, as they've removed MP3 encoding and decoding from the JMF that's downloadable now. Of course, this isn't surprising given recent news about new MP3 licensing terms."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Java Media Framework Drops MP3

Comments Filter:
  • by clambert (519009) on Sunday September 01, 2002 @11:41PM (#4182400) Homepage
    Do they already have Ogg? Was it added? Or will they be adding it? --clambert
  • Unfortunate (Score:2, Interesting)

    by shlong (121504) on Sunday September 01, 2002 @11:44PM (#4182410) Homepage
    I'm a big Java supported, but this is unfortunate. It will only serve to make Java less relevant. You'd think that Sun could have worked out something with donating the licensing fees and made it a 'goodwill' guesture towards the Java community. Oh well.
  • Re:Unfortunate (Score:3, Interesting)

    by mark-t (151149) <markt&lynx,bc,ca> on Sunday September 01, 2002 @11:57PM (#4182451) Journal
    I see your point as to why you feel this is unfortunate, but would you mind explaining to the rest of us exactly why a company should invest licensing fees in something that's almost as free as air?
  • by innocent_white_lamb (151825) on Monday September 02, 2002 @02:19AM (#4182705)
    The existence of a patent somewhere in the world should not affect the GPL.

    That is an excellent point. If this project is somehow patent-encumbered in the USA but not in Canada or Europe, then it should be perfectly legal to use it in Canada and Europe under the terms of the GPL as was intended by the author. However, it seems to me that this project and others like it would be illegal in the USA.

    Yet another reason why I'm thinking that advanced software development (hell, software development in general) may soon be moving out of the USA due to the prevailing legal climate in a manner similar to the way that some doctors are leaving due to the high cost of malpractice insurance created as a result of outrageous jury awards in malpractice suits.

Single tasking: Just Say No.