Mozilla Project Hurt by Apple's Decision to use KH 647
Anonymous Coward writes "I Read this article from ZDNet claiming how some of the Mozilla developers were hurt by Apple's decision to use KHTML over Gecko. I can see both their points. Mozilla was made for cross-platform compatibility, and this probably adds to the bloat, however that's not what they were looking for. They wanted small and fast."
fp (Score:0, Funny)
Fragmentation (Score:1, Funny)
Apple is hurting the entire free world by doing this. They are causing market fragmentation in the browser arena. Many fine companies in democratic countries will suffer..
When you buy Apple, you're supporting terrorism!
Fp! (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Oh, no! Horror of Horrors! (Score:2, Funny)
I'm typing this in Mozilla, which I sear by...
Must be on a Titanium Powerbook.
Re:even if it's "half finished".... (Score:5, Funny)
Safari is closer to 90% done.
Of course, that just leaves the other 90% to do...
It's not Gecko! (Score:1, Funny)
slashdot has a KDE icon (Score:4, Funny)
God, why I am I saying this? Is it that important to my life to spend time typing out inconsiquential facts for random people over the internet? I need a life...
Re:even if it's "half finished".... (Score:2, Funny)
So you're saying when i ran
Damn, that's pretty good for a 7mb app, zipped or not. Amazing!
OT:KHTML can't be _that_ bad w/r/t cross-platform (Score:3, Funny)
This is not a particlarly fast machine, an Athlon 1400 I think,...
*sigh*
I must be getting old; until I read your comment, it didn't occur to me that my Pentium-III 550, a scant four years old (was not willing to spring for the 650) was anything less than blinding in its speed (hey, after a 486-66, it is!). So, just how often am I supposed to replace my machine to keep it reasonable?