ReactOS 0.1.0 Released 278
JasonFilby writes "ReactOS 0.1.0 has been released! ReactOS is an Open Source effort to develop a quality operating system that is compatible with Windows NT applications and drivers. In this release, among other new features and fixes, especially worth mentioning are the ability to boot from CD and self-hosting capabilities (ReactOS can be compiled on ReactOS)." ReactOS has been in progress for a while, often tied to other projects with the aim of seamlessly replacing Windows: you can download an image of Bochs 2.0 with ReactOS 0.1.0 preloaded from the download and changelog page.
heh (Score:0, Informative)
That's not what it says on the site:
The next release, coming before the month is out, will feature: booting from CD and self-hosting
Someone didn't read the submission before posting it...
Re:heh (Score:3, Informative)
todyas date: feb. 2
no gui (Score:1, Informative)
Bravo! Heres some free Windows software (Score:1, Informative)
http://www.theopencd.org/about.php
Re:Could it be merged with wine?? (Score:5, Informative)
Cheers
Jason
Uses FreeDOS (Score:4, Informative)
FWIW, some parts of ReactOS use FreeDOS [freedos.org] components. For example, the ReactOS cmd.exe is based on the FreeDOS "FreeCOM" (the FreeDOS command.com).
Thought you'd like to know. If you're interested in the DOS parts of ReactOS, you're probably better off to download FreeDOS [freedos.org], which is more stable & mature anyway.
Re:no gui (Score:5, Informative)
Re:legal trouble ahead? (Score:5, Informative)
Lindows however who MS saw as a marketing threat since their sort of trying market and sell something that looks and souncs like Windows.
Possible Trademark Problems (Score:2, Informative)
Do a little homework before picking those cool names, folks. Save you a lot of pain down the road.
Re:XFree86 for ReactOS (Score:3, Informative)
And for the record, the idea of using Cygwin to port XF86 to ReactOS was mostly a joke....
Re:Senseless. (Score:1, Informative)
Re:Is this a worthwhile project? (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Senseless. (Score:3, Informative)
To have NT4 support FAT32, you need 3rd party software drivers like this [sysinternals.com].
Re:Senseless. (Score:2, Informative)
Because it's the most realistical goal we could choose
They're abandoning the product. Not the architecture. Nor the codebase. It's not the dead-end you think it is
It's not "supposed to be", it "aims to be"
Re:WINE / X11 (Score:2, Informative)
Driver Development Kit (DDK) accessability (Score:4, Informative)
The only thing to do is implement the Windows XP WDM that will be compatible with previous drivers
see www.microsoft.com/ddk [microsoft.com] for details
[But I do think they are building something with alot of potential]
Comment removed (Score:5, Informative)
Re:no gui (Score:4, Informative)
ReactOS not a bad idea -- it will serve a purpose (Score:2, Informative)
I too use both NT and Linux. As far as Windows goes, I have used "NT based" Windows since 4.0, as I quickly learned that Win95 sucked big ones...
Windows allows me to play games (woohoo! play time!). Especially after Win2000 came out. Finally, USB and newer DirectX was available. And, as long as you had good hardware with well-written drivers, NT is quite livable. However, WPA has turned me off to Windows. MS will never see a cent from me on XP. I had a chance to play with WinXP for a while (on a play-machine as I called it). I was able to trip WPA after some hardware changes. Annoying to say the least. I will stay on 2000 until it is no longer supported.
I love Linux because of it's openness. Sure, it took me awhile to learn it. (Started with RedHat 5.2 when it came out). But, here I am some years later, able to use Linux for everything I need except scanning & games (my scanner has no Linux support last I tried... it's a USB Hewlett Packard 3300C USB, and not all games available for linux. WineX doesn't count in my book).
Oh, you commented about linux taking a beating and still chugging along. One day, a fellow Linux user and I were playing with his dual celeron 400 machine (remember that cool abit mobo back when?) and he was probing around the insides trying to figure out where a noise was coming from. He accidentally unplugged an ide cable! (Yes, his hard drive was on that one) Linux didn't panic or anything. He plugged it back in... the machine didn't seem to notice the difference. (and he did have some background services running.) We had a good laugh on that one (I don't recommend hotswapping anything like that btw)