Tom's Hardware Looks At WinFS 809
Alizarin Erythrosin writes "Tom's Hardware Guide has an article about the new WinFS file system. The article talks first about some of the problems and advantages with FAT[16|32] and NTFS, then talks briefly about WinFS. Here is the summary: 'Microsoft is breaking new ground with Longhorn, successor to XP. The upcoming WinFS file system will be the first to be context-dependent, and promises to make long search times and wasted memory a thing of the past. Today, THG compares it to FAT and NTFS.' Personally, I still have reservations about using a relational database to keep track of files. Unless they can keep the overhead to a minimum, I can't see it being as efficient as a file system should be."
SCO (Score:5, Funny)
Windows Explorer (Score:3, Funny)
Well, yes; we must preserve those system resources for the most recent incarnation of explorer.exe.
always the expert (Score:1, Funny)
And, of course, this author is qualified to pass judgements like the one listed above. Please.
Exactly how efficient should a file system be, genius?
From the article:
"The folder structure shown in the Windows Explorer is thus reduced to a virtual map. Directory structures provide some guidance but do not say where data is actually stored, how the system organizes files or the nature of any data pointers stored with them."
In my miserably unprofessional opinion, obfuscation of the allocation tables in favor of virtual maps that are more user defined or, bettter yet, dynamic, learned content organizations are what the file system should be.
But I already qualified my opinions with the statement... "I don't have any idea what I'm talking about".
Re:Again? (Score:3, Funny)
Re:other FSs are out there (Score:3, Funny)
you can get WindowsXP to run in 2 KibiBytes of ram?!
or
Sorta like running XP in 2K mode
not that that's a bad thing....
Re:I can almost guarantee you.... (Score:5, Funny)
How about Clippy? "I see you're looking for your work files. You're fscked."
Re:This article is bullshit (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Good idea, but ONLY much further out... (Score:2, Funny)
Oh, you mean like the Parallel Virtual File System [clemson.edu], right?
Oh, sorry.
Be proud mate. (Score:5, Funny)
Backards(w) (Score:4, Funny)
Just a joke SQLiers, just a little joke. I know they are indispensible. Really. I believe you.
Microsoft Marketing 101 (Score:5, Funny)
2 years before release: Product will do everything for the majority of users.
1 year before release: Product will do many things for many users.
Release: Well it does something.
Re:WinFS is on top of NTFS (Score:2, Funny)
Microsoft has reached new lows in ripping off ideas from the free software world: They've started using recursive acronyms for names. Where is it going to stop?
Yipee! (Score:3, Funny)
Reservations? (Score:3, Funny)
A hugely conservative Slashdot reader? No way!
Great for Porn collecting (Score:3, Funny)
cute brunette
cute brunette in dress
hot blonde with guy 1
hot blonde with guy 2
hot blonde with dildo 1
Now I can attach meta data like
hair color,
props (clothing, toys, surroundings),
# partners,
partner gender(s),
whatever else... you get the idea