Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Software Operating Systems Windows

Andrew Tridgell Talks About The Future Of Samba 21

Spud writes "Andrew Tridgell tells us what Samba is up to in a new interview." Specifically, he talks about several new features planned for Samba 4.0, and says that the release of 3.0 will happen "soon."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Andrew Tridgell Talks About The Future Of Samba

Comments Filter:
  • Replacing NFS (Score:5, Interesting)

    by kinema ( 630983 ) on Monday September 01, 2003 @11:56PM (#6847861)
    Andrew obviously know his stuff when it comes to networked filesystems. In previous interviews he has let his disgust with CIFS/SMB be known. I wonder if he has any plans to design and write a new FS to compete with the defacto standard NFS.
    • by Anonymous Coward
      Here. [sourceforge.net]

      An implementation of NFS4 is hosted by samba and samba team has lots of connections to this project.

  • by deek ( 22697 ) * on Tuesday September 02, 2003 @12:44AM (#6848012) Homepage Journal
    I especially liked the anecdote about Linus hacking a crashed server to find out what went wrong. Just goes to show how damn proficient the leader of the Linux world is.

    I have now added the National Zoo & Aquarium [zooquarium.com.au] to my list of must-see Canberra places (wow, my list has doubled :). Maybe they'll have Fairy penguin nipping sessions there 'specially for all the visiting geeks. Beats getting mauled by a koala (those things are real killers! [demon.co.uk]).
    • by Anonymous Coward
      As a canberran, I tell you not to bother with either. A tiny waste of time. Check out the Sydney aquariam instead.
  • Linuxworld seems to be Slashdotted, so my knowledge of Tridgell is limited to the fact that he's reverse-engineered two well-known protocols: SMB, and the Tivo subscription thingee. What else has he down? Or should I ask what else has he reverse-engineered?
  • ...most readers have missed the significance of Samba4. Samba3 is already a better Windows fileserver than Windows, in several ways. Samba4 will give Tridge and team the flexibility to nail down every corner when it comes to compatibility and performance. It wouldn't surprise me at all to see features like distributed file stores appear out of this; y'know, rather than buy a $30,000 obsolete-tomorrow monster (and spend another $30-60,000 for MS-seats - "here's your frame, motor, panels and wheels, sir; and how many people will you be buying seats for?"), you buy three reasonable $5000 boxes and get better performance, automatic load-sharing and failover.
  • I've just completed a Samba3 Winbindd setup to synchronise some pop3 users+pws with an NT PDC. I have to admit it was a non-trivial task and i found myself scurrying to the 3.0 Head docs frequently.

    I had been hoping to implement a samba BDC to an NT pdc but i was not successful in my efforts. It is trivial to configure a Samba filer but DC Replication is a still a work in progress. I will wait for the efforts to mature and contemplate the move to a Samba PDC.

    I cannot but extend massive kudos to the Samba

Say "twenty-three-skiddoo" to logout.

Working...