Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Sun Microsystems Operating Systems Software Unix

Previewing the Next Solaris OS 278

Eric Boutilier writes "Amy Rich has written an excellent Solaris Express (Solaris 10) how-to and general overview. It covers how the program works, using the community web site, and what's new in Solaris Express." Among many new features, the TCP/IP stack has been redesigned, IPv6 support improved, and both NFSv4 and USB 2.0 support added.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Previewing the Next Solaris OS

Comments Filter:
  • Program? (Score:4, Funny)

    by NicolaiBSD ( 460297 ) <spam@van d e r s m a gt.nl> on Friday February 20, 2004 @07:40AM (#8338141) Homepage
    It covers how the program works

    But can you run this program called Solaris 10 on Linux? Or do you need wine for that?
  • by fr0dicus ( 641320 ) on Friday February 20, 2004 @07:44AM (#8338159) Journal
    Do you hate having a large improvement in threaded performance too?
  • Re:Nice (Score:1, Funny)

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday February 20, 2004 @08:03AM (#8338226)
    - bad -

    * Linux = for bandwagon tossers who use their computer for the sole purpose of fucking with their computer.
    * Plan9 = for those with no apps to run who want the nostalga of not being able to run anything on Linux.
    * Darwin = for those who bought Apple but wished they'd really bought a x86 machine to run FreeBSD.
    * Windows XP = the OS of choice for professionals. Professional clowns, that is.
    * OSX = the best OS to run on expensive ornamental paperweights that can't actually run any apps.

    - good -

    * Windows 2000 = the desktop OS of choice for people who want to do actual work with their computer.
    * FreeBSD = the server OS of choice for people who just want the damn thing to be as reliable as possible.
  • devfs (Score:3, Funny)

    by binford2k ( 142561 ) on Friday February 20, 2004 @08:10AM (#8338254) Homepage Journal
    Nice, Solaris is getting devfs support . . . just as it is marked deprecated in Linux 2.6
  • Newsflash (Score:3, Funny)

    by Moderation abuser ( 184013 ) on Friday February 20, 2004 @08:13AM (#8338262)
    Early in the morning CDE suffered a fatal heart attack and died during the night. It has finally been laid to rest. Nobody turned up to the funeral.

    That's CDE on Solaris 8 -> Gnome Solaris 9 and the users love it. Needs a bit of stability tweaking though it isn't bad. Also a current revision would be nice.

  • by zz99 ( 742545 ) on Friday February 20, 2004 @08:38AM (#8338360)
    > And although it is less feature-rich and configurable than KDE, its behaviour seems more consistent. That is what businesses and Solaris' market wants.

    That's right, Sun should keep KDE away from Solaris boxes. Experienced CDE-users could have a breakdown if they are suddenly exposed to a desktop with more than four settings :)
  • by )-(ellbilly ( 711798 ) on Friday February 20, 2004 @09:17AM (#8338522)
    Well I just picked up a SUn Enterprise E4000 for 640 bux! Gonna put it in my basement and rule the world...errr underworld.

    But seriously, ebay/sun/solaris is perfect way to run a small home or business op. Friends/family all have nice relaiable web and email services cheap and I have a place to play with my root.

    Cheers,
    )-(ellbilly
  • Re:Nice (Score:2, Funny)

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday February 20, 2004 @10:12AM (#8338902)
    I saw him talk about Plan9 and Linux, but nowhere did I see "Solaris", "Windows", or "OS X". Did I miss something?

    I quote: "Darwin, isn't my thing, I'll wait for my PowerBook and run the real thing on it."

    Here's your question for today: does "the real thing" in the above sentence refer to:

    (a) OS X
    (b) OS X
    (c) OS X
    (d) CowboyNeal
  • suninstall (Score:3, Funny)

    by Rice-Pudding ( 167484 ) on Friday February 20, 2004 @12:38PM (#8340239)
    The Solaris Web Start command-line interface has been replaced with suninstall to improve usability.

    Did anyone else read this as s-uninstall? I was wondering why it was so important to include an uninstall option right away, and to feature it so prominently in the article. :-)

If all else fails, lower your standards.

Working...