Ars Technica Looks At GNOME 2.6 [updated] 336
The Original Yama writes "Ars Technica takes a look inside the GNOME 2.6 Desktop & Developer Platform, due for release any minute now. It builds upon an earlier review of the GNOME 2.5 development series and their own examination of GNOME 2.4."
darthcamaro writes "internetnews.com is running a story about the release of GNOME 2.6 today. They actually got a hold of Miguel de Icaza who had some real interesting stuff to say about it and the Linux Desktop in general. 'de Icaza told internetnews.com that a simpler interface has been the goal of GNOME since at least version 2.0.'" Update: 03/31 21:59 GMT by T : sn0wman3030 was one of many submitters to link to the GNOME 2.6 start page, including links to screenshots, documentation, and source downloads.
Re:USB (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Someone explain this to me, please. (Score:5, Insightful)
Slashdot doesn't create content, but just links to articles. Slashdot is a portal; its only content are the user comments. Ars does great work and their articles are their content. Their stuff is definitely "News For Nerds. Stuff That Matters."
What about (Score:4, Insightful)
Does anyone have any news on this?
Re:Someone explain this to me, please. (Score:2, Insightful)
On a similar note, I used to visit all the deal websites each day to make sure I don't miss out on a hot sale. To save time, I started this page [dealsites.net] to collect them all in real time. Anyone can use it and search deals from multiple websites. Clicking a link takes you to the orginating web page. So I guess I'm running a portal like Slashdot by merely linking to other sites.
spatial metaphor? (Score:3, Insightful)
Looks like someone was trying too hard to do something "revolutionary".
Wow, it remembers the last folder you where in! So does the file browser on freaking xmms.
Everytime you click a folder it opens a new window? That sucks! Ya it can be avoided with a middle click but why do that in the first place, since everyone is obviously just going to use middle click. I wouldn't say that's a bug but it certainly isn't a "feature" either.
Re:I Like Gnome (Score:3, Insightful)
(btw- why is the parent a troll? He's just complementing to DE the article is about)
Speed of 2.6??? (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:I Like Gnome (Score:2, Insightful)
"simpler interface" but at what cost ? (Score:2, Insightful)
Case in point:
Xchat used to have this GUI option called "Old Nick Completion" (Its like zsh's tab completion, but for IRC) But now it doesn't. The code for the function is still there, but the GUI option is not. No offense to the xchat guys, but this easily robs people of a great IRC great experience.
For proof of what I'm talking about:
a) look at this patch: Xchat Old Nick Completion Patch [opencurve.org]
B) the Mandrake Xchat package ships with the above patch
C) download the Xchat source code, and take a gander. Then notice how your own Xchat installation is missing this great feature
Lets not dumb down GREAT SOFTWARE like Xchat!
Sunny Dubey
Re:Spatial Nautilus (Score:3, Insightful)
I was disgusted when I read that in the article. That is rediculous. Expecting users to get used to using an alternate button just for their app... and if you happen to be thinking about the task at hand instead of the UI you'll end up making mode mistakes. Who let this through? Aren't there UI standards in projects like these?
Re:Someone explain this to me, please. (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Gnome needs an install program (Score:4, Insightful)
Nautilus (Score:5, Insightful)
Nice to see this interface ("spatial whatever") being put to proper use outside of the Mac.
I love GNOME's timed releases (Score:2, Insightful)
So far, I love using the latest 2.6 (ok, strictly speaking: 2.5) version. Even sweeter, the 2.8 version is already promising to be a significant improvement with new applications and better infrastructure!
Thanks and great job GNOME developers and testers!
Re:"simpler interface" but at what cost ? (Score:1, Insightful)
There may well be principles that dictate that spacial navigation is "better". But is it really faster? Maybe for a granpa that can't grasp the concept of folders properly... but no disrespect but people like that are going to be dead in 10 yrs. EVERYONE understands folders now, and EVERYONE understands "browsers" with back and forward. I have yet to see a person who doesn't like tabs.
It's insane to be going the route of tabs for browsers, and then be dumbing down the file managers. The two concepts should converge (I don't particularly like konqueror, but they have the convergance bit right).
The rational for ignoring popular opinion and the popular skill-base (windows and osx and now both browsing files, the finder is genius)... let alone ignoring easy of use.
I seriously doubt a person with spacial mode could outpace a person with a window or two in browser mode (there is no dictate saying browser mode has to only have one window) a line on buttons below the title bar is a little larger... but having 5 fewer windows because of it is a massive improvement.
The only way I could imagine using the new nautilus is to have a expose style window management feature and maybe a seperate desktop for all your "file"needs
Nautilus is looking very Mac-like. (Score:3, Insightful)
Nautilus seems to get it incredibly right, though. Although I've yet to use it for myself, Nautilus seems to immitate all the right things from the spatial Finder of old. (I haven't actually used Gnome since version 1.4, but I'm tempted to take another look.)
Kudos to the Gnome team, it's looking better and better with each release.
What's with the spatial desktop??? (Score:4, Insightful)
I just don't get the Gnome devs somtimes (Score:4, Insightful)
Another example that comes to mind is the way they up and switched the "Yes" "No" "Cancel" dialog out of the blue. Right now the way Gnome does it is just bass ackwards to the way 95% of the world is used to. Sure I'm used to it now, but any Windows or KDE user who tries out Gnome will find themselves clicking on the wrong button because Gnome has it backwards. That's what happened to me after getting used to the old Gnome way.
The people in charge at Gnome just don't seem to want to ever settle down and let people get comfortable with the way they interact with the OS. Next release the File Selector will probably be further modified and you'll have to relearn they yet again. It just seems that there is all of this talk about Gnome and their superior HIG methods yet the things that shouldn't be changing get changed with every release. Pick a file selector, pick a file manager setup, pick a file confirmation dialog and stick with it, Forever. Stop changing the basic ways in which we interact with the OS with every release.
Re:What's with the spatial desktop??? (Score:3, Insightful)
Whose conclusion has been almost unanimous? You never asked me.
Please don't call the MS's lame-asses attempt at copying the Mac interface aka Windows 95 "spatial". It is not. In fact, I had trouble swtiching from Win 3.1 to Win95 because MS screwed things up by taking a crufty filesystem, tacking on a couple of layers of recursive abstraction, and then removing the File Manager and replacing it with explorer, which couldn't do either spatial or browser correctly.
The Mac always did this correctly, making the spatial metaphor work because it was consistent (until OS X).
Browser based file navigation is OK as long as it is consistent, but spatial has the advantage of making the filesystem easier to understand. You complain about scalability, but did you use Mac OS 9, where you could "dock" windows as tabs to the bottom of the screen, and navigate using "spring-loaded" folders? I miss that every time I need to use a computer. I was never more efficient at managing my files than I was in those days
The challenge that the gnomers face is using a spatial view on a much more complex filesystem. Hopefully, they pull this off - I can't wait to try the new nautilus to see if they have.
As good as MAC OS X? (Score:4, Insightful)
Suuuuuuurrre it is. And I've got a bridge to sell you cheap.
Don't get me wrong; I hope he's correct. If so, Linux will really start to make some serious inroads on the desktop. But unless 2.6 is really a quantum leap, I don't think it's true.
Mac's are still the all-time usability champs. You can take people who are deathly afraid of computers and they can use a Mac after a short while. So I'll believe it when I see it.
Garg
Comment removed (Score:5, Insightful)
Slashdotters just can't understand Gnome (Score:5, Insightful)
The majority of the posts I'm seeing that are 'anti-gnome' stem from the sheer fact that all of you out there are more than just computer users; you are programmers, devleopers, engineers, students, enthusiests, etc. Gnome is not directly targeted toward you.
The Gnome Desktop is very forward looking, as what it does is based on the assumption that Linux On The Desktop will be truely realized one day, and it is preparing to meet the needs of those future (read: not yet existing) Linux users. That isn't to say that Gnome can't be used by any contemporary Linux user with an advanced computer knowledge, it's just not made tailored to you guys. Play around with it. Get to know it a bit more. Then customize to you're liking. Gnome can work however you want it to. That's one of the more beautiful aspects of it.
As for the so-called lack of intuitiveness, this is just plain false. Gnome is as intuitive as a never-used-a-computer computer user can experience (without violating any patents!). Beacuse realistically, the _user_ needs only their home directory with a few sub directories (Documents, Pictures, Music, Movies, etc.). You don't need more than a window or two to manage them. That aforementioned Linux _user_ of the future will appreciate how easy it is to drag and drop between these folders in multiple windows. For the rest of you, it's your duty to discover that parent folder widget as well as the "Browse Folder" option in the right-click menu (i think that's where it is).
In reality, the future linux user (and really all users) will only need to access files as items in a niche program like Rhythmbox or OpenOffice/AbiWord which specifically deal with a particular document type.
I agree that maybe nautilus-cd-burner doesn't jive well anymore. Something along the lines of Mac OS X's 'Burn to CD' radioactive icon is needed somewhere, or something. Thse sorts of things are minor, however, since the Gnome desktop is still not in its future where Linux is mainstream, they still have time to figure out how to manage this issue. In the meantime, chill out, or invest time in compiling k3b.
Slashdot seems to be full of impulsive radicals who vehemently stick to their OS/DE/Apps of choice, and are quick to insult anyone or anything else that's not their favorite. It's a strange sort of application bigotry. Of course, ignorance plays no part in bigotry...
Re:Spatial Nautilus (Score:5, Insightful)
Invariably, my physical desk gets stacked deep with huge piles of papers and other miscellaneous stuff. This sucks because I can't find what I need amongst all of the clutter. My opinion is that this "spatial navigation", or popping up dozens of windows or whatever, is just emulating this undesirable clutter on the computer.
The computer is able to manage navigation very neatly with features such as the back-arrow dropdown list in file managers and browsers. If such a feature were available in the real world, my physical desktop would always be neat and I'd save gobs of time. (Hmm, maybe I should try installing a cafeteria dish stack holder in my desk...)
I don't agree that always trying to emulate the limitations of the real world is a good thing just because the limitations of the real world are more "intuitive".
Re:Oh yea. (Score:2, Insightful)
Hear, Hear! (Score:4, Insightful)
Prior to this it too often seemed like all the serious file managment options boiled down to: "You can have a file manager that works however you want, as long as it's some minor variation on Windows' browser metaphor".
Choice is a good thing.
GnomeMac, KDEWin (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Oh god... (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Oh yea. (Score:3, Insightful)
In other news, the Slashdot Borg Entity has dissolved itself after two members expressed different opinions on an issue.
Re:+1, informative (Score:3, Insightful)
While another view mode would have been more intuitive, it would not have followed the Gnome philosophy of a more intuitive interface. Now isn't that intuitive?
Seriously, when a desktop starts making things harder to use in an effort to make them easier, there's a serious disconnect.
GnomeVFS sounds awesome (Score:2, Insightful)
Allan: "Whoa, whoa, Gnome's getting _really_ smart!"
Me: "No, it's getting really STUPID. It only understands opening and saving.
Gnome: "FTP? Yeah, I'm not sure what that is, but I'd sure like to save this document right now to this location.
GnomeVFS: "Sure thing." *** 1337 under-cover action ***
Gnome: "Oh, you can do that for me? Cool!"
- Kurt