Kodak vs. Sun Java Trial Date Set 152
sirshannon writes "CNET News.com.com.com.com is reporting that the Kodak vs. Sun trial date has been set for September 15. Kodak claims that Java infringes on 3 patents they hold and have been trying to "resolve" the issue for 4 years or so. More info here."
This is so sad... (Score:5, Interesting)
Same old same old... (Score:4, Interesting)
Is it me, or does this summary feel suspiciously like every other programming language ever written? It seems to me that core concepts fundamental to any language shouldn't be a valid basis for IP...
Fortunatly Sun has clarified lately ... (Score:3, Interesting)
Ok, some offtopic now, i saw on
See for instance a "nice" reference in the Tiger specification (upcoming J2SE1.5)
http://www.jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=176
4.1 This section contains any additional information that the submitting Member wishes to include in the JSR.
Sun plans to adhere to the proposed new JSPA licensing model for this JSR, including allowing independent implementations, licensing the TCK separately from the RI, minimizing shared code, and licensing any remaining shared code (such as the verifier) on simple non-restrictive licensing terms. In addition Sun plans to make it easier for academic and non-profit groups to obtain access to the RI and TCKs.
So why is GNU's classpath still lagging ? anybody at FSF care about the advantage this could bring to OSS comunity ? Think of it Mr RMS
Let's get GNU's Classpath full Java complient !!!
This is not at all trollish in mind, it is just something i warn people that is now possible, and whatever Sun is willing to do in the future they can no more do anything about that
Of course some people, said that the RI should be OSed (cf. the last ran between Sun & IBM couple of days ago). I agree if it is a GPL, but if is a less viral license then the risk of seen MS take advantage of this to weaken the platform is high.
Meanwhile, why wait from Sun, when we can get our own
The patents (Score:4, Interesting)
The patents deal with objects and the way objects can be manipulated in a computer. Basically it deals with object oriented programming. Now someone tell me that OOPS is not patented a technology and we don't have to pay a royalty everytime we write a program using the OOPS paradigm.
So the question is what ramifications do these software patents have for the programming world as a whole? And why is Kodak targetting only Java and therefore Sun. Why not C++ or other OOPS languages?
The case may not be well founded, however... (Score:3, Interesting)
I may be totally wrong, but this kind of action altought not directly profitable to the suer, may accomplish other goals, read FUD.
Re:This is so sad... (Score:5, Interesting)
As usual, I'm betting on the lawyers being the only winners while the companies themselves suffer death by a thousand paper cuts from all of the legal documents...
Re:This is so sad... (Score:5, Interesting)
If it is the MS trials you are reffering too, you obviously have your head shoved up way to far up your MCSE ass.
There were some trademark related ones, or threats of, over Java. They were just enforcing the fact that people can't call something Java or 100% Java compatible unless it's been tested as such. This is a good thing for the developer community that needs to rely on the claims of something being 100% pure java.
The only one I found regarding patents was related to Kingston which Sun later dropped. A stupid decision to start the suit in my opinion.
You want to talk about big patent lawsuits you're looking at the wrong tech company identified by three letters. Even MS is taking big blue's cue and building a patent portfolio to start raising revenue.
Read this interesting bit on how IBM tried to bully Sun out of $10 million in it's early days." [forbes.com]
Re:Great. (Score:3, Interesting)
The patent is sufficiently vague as to encompass so many things it probably covers RMI as well.
But shouldn't a vague patent make it easier to find prior art?
patent 5,421,012 seems unrelated, unless their trying to tie it in to J2EE application servers in some weird fashion.
5,226,161 is just gettings stupid. Patenting "object managers" in any way shape or form is stupid.
They are simply patenting object oriented elements of software. They can not succeed with this vague strategy for a few reasons. One, they do not have enough money to take on the whole software world. Two, their patents are so close to OOD that their must be tons of prior art.
Re:The patents (Score:4, Interesting)
so
In keeping form... (Score:2, Interesting)
Software Patents storm in Europe (Score:3, Interesting)
The patent officials in the Commission and Council are abusing the legislative process of the EU. Their convoluted and misleading Patent Newspeak, negotiated in intransparent backroom dealings, is an insult to the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee, the Committee of Regions and the innumerable experts and concerned citizens who have engaged in serious investigations on this directive project. It is unacceptable that the Council is throwing away all their hard work without any substantial justification whatsoever.
One to blame is the Irish Presidence, Sponsored by Microsoft [eu2004.ie].
FFII [ffii.org] web site with more info about software patents.
Soon there will be ellections for the European Parlament, take care of what you vote and if you have the ocasion, ask the politians about this issue.
Re:The patents (Score:3, Interesting)
and no, it's not Kodak that developed it - they just got the patents of a dying software company ^_^
Re:Kodak is Dumb. (Score:3, Interesting)
This is the same kodak that is offshoring film production because they are unable to compete with Fuji Film.
Offshoring is being done because it is cheaper. Period. Kodak has many problems, for sure, but film competition is not one of them any more. Their Portra line of professional films is outstanding: I certainly prefer them to Fuji's portrain films. Their black and white films and their chemicals are still some of the best.
The biggest recent problem for Kodak has been the onset of Digital photography. This has hit all traditional film manufacturers: Kodak, Fuji, Ilford, Agfa...
Fuji Film is made in the USA.
Fuji Film for sale in the USA may be made in the USA. There are many types of Fuji film emulsions that are made and sold outside of the United States.
Re:Oak existed before 1993 (Score:3, Interesting)
Here's a little exercize for you: Try comparing LISP with the independent claims word for word and see if they match. Also, don't assume anything about LISP that you can't prove. Go back and find some old user manuals from before August 21, 1987 and see if LISP actually meets all the limitations of the claim. I'm interested to know what you come up with.
Re:Kodak Products are a Proprietary Nightmare (Score:3, Interesting)
Kodak stopped making film for these cameras precisely because they weren't making money on them. Anybody using a bellows camera in the US with a format smaller than 4"x5" after about 1965 was in for a lot of ridicule. Instamatics were always regarded as junk by anybody doing even "advanced amateur" photography. (The Instamatic cartidge can't hold film in a dependable enough position to get reliably sharp pictures at wide lens apertures.) Once disposables became popular, the Instamatic format was doomed.