Mozilla 1.7, Firefox 0.9 Release Candidates Out 642
An anonymous reader writes "mozilla.org have released what are expected to be the final release candidates for their next versions: Mozilla 1.7RC3 (MozillaZine article; download) should iron out any final bugs in what will replace 1.4 as the new stable branch and Firefox 0.9RC (MozillaZine article; download) features the new default theme ported from Mac OS on Windows (though please bear in mind that the theme is nowhere near finished yet). The final releases of these versions are due very soon."
I hope they fix the slow loading issue ! (Score:5, Interesting)
Also, some pages like WashingtonPost.com have a problem where it is constantly reloading itself (perhaps a JS error).
IE (Score:2, Interesting)
Sigh...
Torrents (Score:5, Interesting)
Anyone notice that there are editor holy wars (vi emacs), distro holy wars, but no 'browser' holy wars (yeah, ie vs mozilla, but that windows vs linux... I'm talking all in linux). Stuff like 'theme isn't finished' would be jumped on by the 'other browser' elitists. So linux needs a second open source free browser project so we can have a browser holywar.
Differences between Linux and Windows HTML engines (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Very clean! (Score:2, Interesting)
Nowhere near finished, but due out soon? (Score:5, Interesting)
Yes, I know Firefox is "for those on the cutting edge", and I guess we shouldn't expect cutting-edge products to be completely finished in every respect, but Firefox is the only open source product most of my Windows-using friends are willing to even try. It would be a shame to hamper its continued spread by making the default theme an unfinished one.
Re:Very clean! (Score:5, Interesting)
Yeah, Firefox did a great job of importing my bookmarks, from frickin' Internet Explorer, which I don't even use, but not the bookmarks from the previous Firefox (0.8) install. Real helpful.
Ah well, at least it's not IE.
Am I the only one.. (Score:1, Interesting)
Excuse me but on real heavy load (like 60 tabs of large pages) mozilla manages well when firefox at least to me with the official binaries crashes.
I'm talking about the 0.8.
Re:Nowhere near finished, but due out soon? (Score:2, Interesting)
mozilla vs. firefox/thunderbird? (Score:3, Interesting)
I've been using mozilla for a long time, and haven't had a reason to try the new offsprings, so I'm mainly looking for an overview.
Can't beat Konqueror's font rendering though (Score:4, Interesting)
Firefox 0.9 RC1 on Windows theme problem (Score:3, Interesting)
The new default theme looks UGLY... so I figure ok, I can change it. Every theme I tried from the themes site didn't work (wouldn't install)
As an extra irrotation, someone decided it's a good idea to change the hotkey that opens the downloads window.. that was the last straw for me.
I wish there was a smooth scrolling autoscroll. (Score:1, Interesting)
So if you're looking for smooth autoscroll, IE remains the best.
It is the only reason I keep using IE.
Problems with .9 rc (Score:2, Interesting)
I think I am going to like firefox's new extention manager/updator as well, looks cool.
All in all it looks like a good release, with just a couple bugs to iron out. Then the authors of the extentions need to update them too.
Copies IE's settings??? (Score:1, Interesting)
Jeez. It even copied the geometry settings.
And the banner ad at the top of this page has scrollbars on it for some reason. But who cares about ads?
Re:Big deal (Score:2, Interesting)
I personally resisted the move to firefox (on non IE browser) for long, trying alternative browsers and giving up because one small function/feature is missing. The last straw with IE was when the web sites started getting popups inspite of the google blocker. That plus the undesirable images that come in webmails or websites made me switch.
FYI, the killer feature I like in firefox is its ability not to load any image in the current site/page that is not from that site, sure fire way to kill all those ads.
Only problem I see is the way firefox works in linux (KDE) vs windoze (esp the backspace key). guess, I just need to learn to use alt-arrow
Re:Big deal (Score:1, Interesting)
Re:Nowhere near finished, but due out soon? (Score:3, Interesting)
From Ben Goodger's weblog: [mozillazine.org]
The transition from the Qute theme has caused quite a stir, and pleas for constructive responses have been widely ignored. All I can say to those upset with how this was negotiated is that in a perfect world, things might have been done better, this isn't that world, it is a more complex and interesting dynamic than has been made public, there is no use in crying over spilled milk, so get over it.
Those of you who have attacked Kevin and Stephen should be ashamed of yourselves. Calm down, take a chill pill, or you'll severely limit the likelihood that anyone that matters will listen to you. Say what you will about me, but be constructive about the new theme or kerz and other MozillaZine moderators will lock your accounts. I have disabled comments since I'm not interested in hearing people bellyache any more. We (myself, VDT, marketing, etc) are frankly sick of it.
Good software development is not done by committee, it requires strong leadership and tough decisions. Time will tell whether or not this was a good one. I think it was, and expect to be vindicated by the release, and the continual improvement and commitment to excellence that the theme's authors have promised.
Yes, he may eventually be "vindicated", but what I see here is a worrisome attitude towards the user and developer communities. "We (I) know what's best, no matter how many people in the community present reasoned arguments to the contrary. If you complain about our decisions you're just a whiner, and we're going to censor you to the extent we can. Oh, and we have hidden secret information we're not telling you, so you can't possibly know what we're talking about." It's walking on thin ice at best, juvenile and egotistical at worst.
I love Firefox and I plan to use 0.9 when it's released (possibly with the Qute theme installed separately). But, whatever you think of the new theme aesthetically, I think the surprise move and disrespect for the community response speaks poorly for the project. They have a good product, which is why it was able to survive multiple name changes and the "loss" of direct AOL support, and I think it'll survive this. But it doesn't encourage me to contribute to Mozilla development, and it'll probably mean I'll pay more attention to alternatives when people mention them.
Open source: live by the community, die by the community.
Not true (Score:5, Interesting)
We used to use Eudora around here. I don't know why, it was before I got hired. Well we have lots of people that STILL USE IT! Version 3 even. We try to push them towards Thundirbird. I mean there is nothing I can think of that Eudora does that Thundirbird doesn't (other than suck) and lots of things it can't do. Also an e-mail client is an e-mail client. I mean they all get your mail, list it, and let you reply.
Nope. There is man who bitch and whine and refuse to change. It's too hard to learn, they say. A Eudora skin would make my life much easier, though I'd reeally rather they learn the new interface (it takes what, 10 seconds to learn?)
So never say "people won't care because it's a little different. They can, and will, for some damn reason.
Re:Very clean! (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Very clean! (Score:4, Interesting)
Fine, I'll take my
Windows 95 (Score:4, Interesting)
Long story short: I did a fresh install of Win 95 C (the latest and greatest version of 95) and proceeded to download Mozilla 1.6 stable and 1.7rc3 and Firefox. However, none of these browsers would work... just a brief start-up splash-screen and then... nothing.
I know 95 is old, but Mozilla is a must these days. I'm no bug-hunting, bug-reporting expert, but could anyone on
Thanks
Re:Very clean! (Score:4, Interesting)
How can we let Mozilla know that we aren't happy with the new default theme? I realize that it is not complete, but I really don't like where it's going. I can't even make out what the "new tab" button is supposed to be.
Anyone else like or dislike the new theme?
Re:Can't beat Konqueror's font rendering though (Score:4, Interesting)
But konqueror does a very good job with these fonts (provided they are installed locally), and what's more the anti-aliasing in Konqueror imakes fonts much cleaner and easier to read than firefox. And I have compiled firefox from source with GTK and what not.
But at work where I have to use firefox, as there is no KDE, I'll be eagerly awaiting the 0.9 build for solaris, for they have fixed these 3 bugs which have annoyed me for quite some time.
205893 [mozilla.org] - Loading lots of images makes Firefox stop repainting.
229600 [mozilla.org] - Installing 2 extensions without restarting re-launches extension-installer for previous installed extensions.
For a comprehensive list see bigger-picture [squarefree.com]
Btw, for all Solaris users, Althought the download page of Firefox has a link to Solaris tarballs, they are non existant, i.e. 404.
Re:Very clean! (Score:3, Interesting)
Be warned HCI is crap (Score:5, Interesting)
URL fails to load -> url blanked
Switch from one tab to another while url loading -> old url displayed.
Page fails to load because of DNS lookup -> stored in the menu bar cache!.
Download -> gets sent somewhere whithout asking, doesn't tell the user that anythings happended.
Download again -> creates a new file blar+1 no continue/overwrite prompt or anything.
Close browser while downloading -> canceles all your downloads.
Download more than one extension -> get anoying prompts that are incorrect!
etc... etc.... etc.... etc.....
Firefox has to be one of the most anoying pieces of software I have ever used.
I only use it because it's more standards complient and faster than the alternitives.
Re:Mozilla/Firefox Whitelist (Score:4, Interesting)
The best way to make images more theft-resistant is to put them in a lightweight Flash movie that loads them up. I have a whole website designed in Flash which loads content dynamically, and it uses 116k for the whole site. It's true someone could score the URL and just load it directly. If you put the images in the SWF, the size will increase and someone could save and "decompile" the SWF.
If you don't want to go the Flash route and stick to straight HTML, cut your images into smaller squares and use CSS or tables to assemble them in the browser. That's more of a pain but casual image theft is less likely when someone has to paste together 16 thumbnail-sized images.
Don't take features away from our broswer. Remember: no matter what you do, someone can always take a screen shot. Your content will never be secure on a computer, so don't try to make it.
Portable Firefox (Run from a USB key) (Score:5, Interesting)
http://johnhaller.com/jh/mozilla/portable_firefox
Any commentary or questions on this new feature can be addresses in this thread on mozillaZine [mozillazine.org].
Re:Very clean! (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Not impressed... (Score:3, Interesting)
Hmm..
gay
adj. gayer, gayest
1) Showing or characterized by cheerfulness and lighthearted excitement; merry.
2) Bright or lively, especially in color: a gay, sunny room.
Whether or not this was the meaning the original poster intended, it seems to describe the 0.9 theme quite well.
I think the only thing worse than insensitive people are you over-sensitive, paranoid bastards. Lighten up!
Re:I hope they fix the slow loading issue ! (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Not true (Score:2, Interesting)
I've never understood the point of e-mail virus scanners. They're nothing but a source of problems.
firefox on the mac? just use camino (Score:3, Interesting)
anyways, as i've tested every major version of firefox for the mac for the past year or so, this one miserably failed in a few short seconds:
and with that, it was closed and deleted immediately. maybe they'll fix those two things that are absolustely essential to me one day. oh well, in the mean time i'll just stick with camino (which is buggy as shit right now).
Re:CSS3 Opacity added (Score:4, Interesting)
Eh? I am not sure if the CSS opacity they're refering to is different from what I am thinking of, but CSS Opacity won't be a "bonus" to Moz users. Take a look at the (never finished) page in my sig. Click on the image. You see those yellow "sticky notes" that show up? Do they look transparent to you?
If they do, you're using MSIE (or maybe the new Mozilla?)
So it's not like it's something new Mozilla has as an advantage over other browsers. It's something Moz is catching up to. The page in my sig was done at least a year and a half ago and the transparency has been a "bonus" for MSIE users. Mozilla didn't barf on the code (It's standard IIRC) but it just showed the yellow as Opaque.
If these guys mean something else by CSS opacity, I am sorry to rant.
Re:Yes it can stop animated gifs (Score:3, Interesting)
So (Score:1, Interesting)