Open Source Geographic Information Systems 189
RGillig writes "The second MapServer Users Meeting and the first ever Open Source GIS Conference was held on June 9th to 11th in Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. The initial response from the Open Source GIS community is that the conference was a huge success. It was great to have people from private, government, academia, and communities all together discussing how Open Source GIS applies to their needs. Here is a presentation given by Paul Ramsey, Director, Refractions Research Inc. that outlines the current state-of-the-art for Open Source GIS, and includes links and information about all of the current software packages/efforts, etc."
opensource GIS predates Linux... (Score:5, Informative)
This is good stuff (Score:5, Informative)
Refractions Research maintains the PostGIS module for PostgreSQL, and while it is not yet complete (fix the ACROSS function guys!) it certainly makes the wrangling of data much easier as it implements the OpenGIS SQL specification.
Compare this to the old days of a dozen different formats which weren't convertable, it's much nicer with GML (Geographic Markup Language) and standard representations of geographic features made possible by the find folks involved in the OpenGIS consortium.
Props to the team at the University of Minnesota for MapServer, it's made my life a whole lot easier.
Here's Hoping (Score:5, Informative)
We have plenty of 'free' data... (Score:5, Informative)
I say 'free' because in reality the US taxpayers have paid for it, but take a look at things like:
Kansas DASC [ukans.edu],
Census Bureau TIGER data [census.gov],
collection sites like Geo Community [geocomm.com],
and an almost limitless number of other sites. Most states now have GIS sites of one form or another, with downloadable data.
Jim Deane
Data, not programs (Score:4, Informative)
It's all controlled by municipalities. Toronto wants a small
fortune for copies of TAXPAYER paid-for data.
Re:Where is Ottawa, Ontario, Canada? (Score:2, Informative)
Granted while it a little out of scope, it indeed proves that there IS another Ontario anywhere else in the world
Re:Programmers' tools, not finished applications (Score:3, Informative)
I didn't get very far as the documentation is pretty light, and I have a hard time coming up with info in the Arcinfo/E00 format or finding a decent converter.
Re:This is good stuff (Score:4, Informative)
Indeed. I was glad to read of JUMP in this report because I was looking for something along the lines of ARCView for occasional use and had been very frustrated with GRASS. GRASS may be extremely powerful and flexible for geographers etc, but for occasional analysis (by non-experts) it really sucks. JUMP looks to be just the ticket.
I guess I'll know a little while once the download completes.
Re:Data, not programs (Score:2, Informative)
Re:This is good stuff (Score:2, Informative)
Feel free to contact me or to sign up on the mailing list for the JUMP Unified Mapping Platform.