Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Databases Programming Software GNU is Not Unix

Is MySQL Planning a Change of Tune? 403

Iggy writes "After reading the article on 'The MySQL License Question' by Timothy R. Butler at Open for Business I just have to wonder, is this company's wording on the MySQL site indicating the company is backing away from Free Software, specifically, the GPL? Great reading and certainly thought provoking."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Is MySQL Planning a Change of Tune?

Comments Filter:
  • by Anonymous Coward on Monday August 16, 2004 @08:58PM (#9986666)
    Like a lot of us are. Their interpretation is a bit off and I'm sure they'll correct it.
  • by borgdows ( 599861 ) on Monday August 16, 2004 @09:01PM (#9986681)
    Consistency in a database is important too, whatever they choose I'll stick with Postgresql.
  • It's MySQL (Score:5, Funny)

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday August 16, 2004 @09:10PM (#9986739)
    not YourSQL.

    If they wanted you to own it, they would have named it that way.

  • by deathcloset ( 626704 ) on Monday August 16, 2004 @09:17PM (#9986781) Journal
    TheirSQL

    *snicker snicker*
  • by VirexEye ( 572399 ) on Monday August 16, 2004 @09:18PM (#9986788) Homepage
    The classic "farewell and fork you!"
  • by borgdows ( 599861 ) on Monday August 16, 2004 @09:31PM (#9986864)
    or maybe : OurSQL BelongToUs Edition
  • I'll give you my reading, because the other followup didn't catch all your questions:
    Thanks, because right now Open for Business' server should be renamed Closed for Business (slashdotted).
  • by mumblestheclown ( 569987 ) on Monday August 16, 2004 @09:57PM (#9987004)
    Shhh! You're exposing the real cracks in the OSS model!

    Commercial Software

    a few guys then
    a few products then
    early success then
    money! then
    more guys then
    a few more products then
    more money!
    then more products (some good some bad) then
    more money! then
    more guys then..

    OSS:

    a few guys then
    a few products then
    early success then
    fame and glory for a few guys then
    more guys then
    a few more products then
    some fame for more guys then
    maybe some people will join here and there then
    a few bug fixes and patches then
    not really any fame for the new guys then
    people just stop caring because..
    it suddenly dawns the german dork who spent 3 months in his basement writing a slighly faster screen refresh algorithm for some OSS spreadsheet program that has 1% market and that is pretty much only due to some for-profit entity working to the letter but not the spirit of the GPL that a) deep down, nobody gives a damn about where their spreadsheet screen refresh algoritm comes from and b) that there is an outside, and that even chasing girls unsuccessfully is better than working for redhat/ibm/whatever without getting paid.

  • by ejaw5 ( 570071 ) on Monday August 16, 2004 @09:57PM (#9987009)
    This SQL is YourSQL
    This SQL is MySQL

    MySQL's changin' Licenses
    YourSQL's a G P L

    This SQL was made for you and me.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Monday August 16, 2004 @11:10PM (#9987588)
    How about mixing in some evidence or facts in your rant?

    How did this pile of shit get marked insightful too?
  • by Anonymous Coward on Monday August 16, 2004 @11:31PM (#9987731)
    Interestingly, this gave MySQL a niche in the small/medium website market. People who couldn't justify the complexity of earlier builds of Postgres jumped on MySQL because - although it makes the hard things impossible - it makes the most common tasks in a dynamic environment manageable for even the most clueless n00b.

    Actually... it's more like folks jump on MySQL because they don't have any idea what a database does or is used for and they don't really understand their problem to begin with. They think databases are just somewhere to shove data and pull it out later. Typically, these people will poo-poo things like transactional security, referential integrity, and the like, claiming that no one needs them, when in fact, they don't understand what they are or what they're for. In the end, these people shovel out code that is potentially far worse than anything they flame on /. while still feeling superior because their code is "fast" and "that's all that matters". I imagine that these folks would attempt to use MySQL to write Banking code. I just hope I can find out what projects these people work on so I can avoid those products like the plague.

    These are the types of things that not having formal training in CS and the like get you. Some self-taught basement dweller who obviously knows all there is to know about computers because they are able to download and install Linux declares that transactions, referential integrity, stored procedures, and the like are worthless. It's hard to use something that you don't understand. Not understanding what the features of a real RDBMS gives you causes you not to use them. Ignorance isn't always bliss.
  • by Tokerat ( 150341 ) on Monday August 16, 2004 @11:52PM (#9987851) Journal

    Well, sounds better than NotTheirSQL.
  • by Inthewire ( 521207 ) on Tuesday August 17, 2004 @12:29AM (#9988038)
    ...am I on crack?

    No idea.
    Got modpoints?

Arithmetic is being able to count up to twenty without taking off your shoes. -- Mickey Mouse

Working...