QA != Testing 342
gManZboy writes "Original author of Make and IBM Researcher, Stu Feldman has written an overview of what should be (but is sadly perhaps not) familiar ground to many Slashdotters: Quality Assurance. He argues that QA is not equivalent to 'testing', and also addresses the oft-experienced (apparent) conflict between QA-advocates and 'buisiness goals.'"
Let's say what Linus says about QA (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Let's say what Linus says about QA (Score:3, Funny)
Any chance.. (Score:5, Funny)
It's "business", not "buisiness".
Re:Requirements? (Score:2, Funny)
Reminds me of my first programming job. For five years I worked for a boss, who only drew screenshots and then said: "Program this".
Leisuretown (Score:1, Funny)
If you haven't, the site is no longer up, but here's a mirror:
QA Confidential [leisuretown.us]
Re:Six Sigma (Score:3, Funny)
The idea is to remove variation so that everything you do is always the same.
They introduced that in a company I once worked for. (Thankfully I'm out.) They did a big presentation to the whole company, telling us how wonderful it was going to be, and explaining that it wasn't about quality but consistency. A voice piped up from the back... "So if every bill goes out 18 months late, we win!"
Re:Requirements? (Score:2, Funny)
-Peter
Re:Requirements? (Score:2, Funny)
QA Testers (Score:1, Funny)
You mean: QA = (!Testing); (Score:2, Funny)