Sun Offering Optimized AMP Stack On Solaris 135
tbray writes "This is your friendly local Sun corporate drone reporting that we're going to be building and optimizing and DTrace-ing and shipping and supporting the AMP part of LAMP (details here). I think that basically the whole tech industry, excepting Microsoft, is now at least partly in the AMP camp."
Well, I'm AMP'd (Score:2, Funny)
i love carpet... i love desk.. (Score:2, Funny)
I love lamp.
Yeah but... (Score:2, Funny)
Meanwhile... (Score:4, Funny)
...Microsoft is announcing an optimized ISA (IIS Server, SQL Server, ASP.NET) Linked List on Windows Vista(TM). More details to follow.
You call that an AMP stack? (Score:2, Funny)
Re:SAMP VS LAMP (Score:5, Funny)
strcmp confirms it, SAMP is greater than LAMP!
Re:You call that an AMP stack? (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Well, I'm AMP'd (Score:3, Funny)
Re:The "AMP Camp"??? (Score:4, Funny)
LAMP still easily give you the best price/performance.
Illegal division by zero
Re:Postgres Migration (Score:2, Funny)
When the database connections are abstracted properly it becomes fairly trivial to swap out DB backends without changing much, if anything of the application itself.
Nice in theory, but MySQL, being an "extended subset" of SQL, doesn't support a lot of standard SQL features, then makes up for it by doing it their own nonstandard way. Perl is nice about abstraction with the DBI, but PHP is a complete mess. Every PHP project I've seen either a) uses raw mysql_* functions or b) uses a roll-your-own db "abstraction" which is tied to mysql tighter than the ball gag in CmdrTaco's mouth when Cowboy Neal re-enacts the gimp scene from Pulp Fiction.