Rails May Not Suck 160
Posted
by
timothy
from the isn't-the-question-whether-rails-suck dept.
from the isn't-the-question-whether-rails-suck dept.
KDan writes "With astonishing regularity, articles or posts come out claiming that the popular Ruby on Rails framework sucks in some way or another. People complain that Rails isn't as easy to deploy as PHP, that Rails just didn't do it for project XYZ. They range from the articulate and well thought out to the frankly inane and stupid (and wrong). Recently, there's also of course been the spectacular nuclear rant by Zed Shaw, which was more a rant against random elements of the community than against Rails, but was still presented as a rant against Rails.
Here's an article that tries to put some perspective on why these opinions are irrelevant to whether or not Rails sucks."
Submission may not suck. (Score:3, Funny)
Next time you're trying to defend something, don't start from 'may not suck'. Try something a little more positive.
Re:Ruby (Score:3, Funny)
this article is useless (Score:4, Funny)