RMS Steps Down As Emacs Maintainer 321
sigzero writes "Short but sweet: RMS is stepping down as Emacs Maintainer: 'From: Richard Stallman, Subject: Re: Looking for a new Emacs maintainer or team, Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 17:57:22 -0500 Stefan and Yidong offered to take over, so I am willing to hand over Emacs development to them."
Maybe... (Score:5, Funny)
As expected. (Score:5, Funny)
no, wait....
Are maintainers even necessary? (Score:5, Funny)
Butterfly effect? (Score:5, Funny)
Re:As expected. (Score:5, Funny)
(asdf-just-because-the-code-is-all-in-one-namespace-p
asdf-does-not-make-it-ineffective))
Re:Maybe... (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Are maintainers even necessary? (Score:5, Funny)
Wow (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Maybe... (Score:5, Funny)
Re:As expected. (Score:5, Funny)
No wait...
Re:Maybe... (Score:5, Funny)
T,FTFY. HAND.
hmm (Score:5, Funny)
The article is EXTREMELY misleading (Score:5, Funny)
Damnit RMS .... (Score:5, Funny)
Re:May His Next Adventure Be Twice as Fruitfull (Score:5, Funny)
For example, to make picture-mode work for photographs, you'd need a canvas about the size of an aircraft carrier flight deck to express the pixels as text, more RAM than Dodge's truck division to hold the image, and a great deal of patience to scroll it on a typical LCD.
Really, it's OK to pick the proper tool for the job.
Goodbye (Score:5, Funny)
More time to work on HURD? (Score:4, Funny)
Re:hmm (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Emacs bloat (Score:4, Funny)
Please explain.
Re:Damnit RMS .... (Score:5, Funny)
(Had to say it)
Re:Wow (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Maybe... (Score:5, Funny)
The reason he is leaving.. (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Stallman is still around? (Score:5, Funny)
Emacs vs Vi
GPL vs BSDL
GNU/Linux vs Linux
Free vs Open Source
etc etc...
Not that I'm trying to discredit his contributions to Free/Opensource Software, but a "peace" award might be a bit off the mark
Favorite from reddit: (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Wow (Score:5, Funny)
Of course, being Slashdot, comparing Bill Gates to him is Official Policy....
Re:May His Next Adventure Be Twice as Fruitfull (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Wow (Score:5, Funny)
I kid, I kid... all the best wishes for RMS and Emacs both.
Re:The article is EXTREMELY misleading (Score:3, Funny)
Re:As expected. (Score:5, Funny)
I heard this was so he could have more time to work on HURD
Well, he could always port HURD so it runs on Emacs ...
Good news for MS coders! (Score:5, Funny)
Real reason? (Score:5, Funny)
Re:As expected. (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Stallman is still around? (Score:1, Funny)
Re:hmm (Score:3, Funny)
I love you (Score:5, Funny)
Actually, I see the problem as the exact opposite. It used to be that people would ask themselves "I got this huge powerful 20 MHz computer with 4 megabytes of RAM, how will I ever I ever use all that power", and the nerd overhearing it would answer "use Emacs", and despite advances in computers, Emacs could keep track and was always the program that could fully utilize your hardware.
However, somewhere along the way we lost out to the competition. I see kids in the Emacs fora who, with a straight face, say they prefer Emacs because it is such as lean and mean editing machine. It is so sad. People nowadays go to Microsoft, KDE or Gnome for software to fully utilize their machines. In the olden days, Emacs would have offered a superset of all of these environments!
I think it is good RMS is stepping back. We need young people to revitalize Emacs, and once again make it a leader in resource consumption. We need to get back to our roots. We need EGACS: Eight Gigabytes And Constantly Swapping.
Re:Emacs bloat (Score:4, Funny)
syntax highlighting
Re:Are maintainers even necessary? (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Are maintainers even necessary? (Score:5, Funny)
Re:I love you (Score:5, Funny)
Wait... how do you pronounce Eclipse?
Re:Maybe... (Score:0, Funny)
Re:Stallman is still around? (Score:3, Funny)
I pronounce it (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Wow (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Stallman is still around? (Score:3, Funny)
1. Simplicity: [_] Notepad [X] Ed
2. Less bloat: [_] Notepad [X] Ed
3. More users: [_] Notepad [X] Ed
and, remember, it's the standard!
Re:Stallman is still around? (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Maybe... (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Maybe... (Score:3, Funny)
Guess it's not all it's cracked up to be.
Re:I love you (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Stallman is still around? (Score:2, Funny)
1. Simplicity: [_] Ed [X] Pencil
2. Less bloat: [_] Ed [X] Pencil
3. More users: [_] Ed [X] Pencil
Re:Butterfly effect? (Score:2, Funny)