Visualizing the .NET Framework 320
eldavojohn writes "If you're a Web developer, you should check out a quick post about the number of types, methods, & fields in the .NET framework. This was done using NDepend. The numbers are quite large — e.g. 39,509 types. The blogger went on to generate tree maps and a dependency matrix."
goatse (Score:4, Funny)
The goggles, etc.
Re:Wow, that's a big fat ASS^H^HPI (Score:5, Funny)
-E. F. Schumacher
Rube Goldberg is alive and working for Microsoft.
Re:Wow, that's a big fat ASS^H^HPI (Score:2, Funny)
Say It!
Correction (Score:5, Funny)
There, fixed that for you.
Re:.NET is OOP gone stupid. (Score:5, Funny)
The idea is that you could encapsulate all that complexity inside a method inside a class--instantiate that class inside a class that has a "main()" and then put the whole thing in a module. You call all of that method with the correct parameters in an instance of another class created and instantiated the same way. You then jar it up as bytecode and then run it on the JVM--making sure your users are running the right versions of the JVM.
On second thought, OMGWTF?
Familiar punchline (Score:4, Funny)
This reminds me of an old joke:
Q: A Marketing executive and an RIAA lawyer jump off the top of a 50 story building. Who hits the ground first?
A: Who the hell cares?
laura, not a fan of .NET
Portable.NET (Score:2, Funny)
Comment removed (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Compare it to the Human Genome (Score:5, Funny)
-G
Re:Compare it to the Human Genome (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Wow, that's a big fat ASS^H^HPI (Score:5, Funny)
Is that a port of a Ruby web application framework to an open-source reimplementation of a (possibly patent-encumbered) proprietary common language runtime?
No wonder it sucks compared to a Honda!
Re:Wow, that's a big fat ASS^H^HPI (Score:3, Funny)
Is that a port of a Ruby web application framework to an open-source reimplementation of a (possibly patent-encumbered) proprietary common language runtime?
Yes, but that's a rather negative way of looking at it [castleproject.org]'
What, you thought you were joking?