Submitting a review for consideration is easy; please first read Slashdot's book review guidelines. Updated: 2008114 by samzenpus
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the Poster. The Rest © 1997-2009 Geeknet, Inc.
Thank you, Monty. (Score:5, Insightful)
I wish him all the best with his new venture, and look forward to seeing what sort of stuff he comes up with next.
Re:Thank you, Monty. (Score:5, Insightful)
Most open source databases have a niche for which they are unquestionably "the best". I believe MySQL's niche has changed over the years, but there is no question in my mind that it is superior to any other database at those specific tasks.
Likewise, Postgres, Ingres, Firebird, SQLite, QDBM, etc, are all good at their own thing. I really can't imagine anyone running a website from Ingres, but then I can't imagine anyone running a high-end scientific database through MySQL, trying to do relational work through QDBM, or running a single table database on Postgres.
Different horses for different courses. (NB: The expression does NOT originate in France.)
Parent
Re:Thank you, Monty. (Score:4, Interesting)
> Yeah, I use Postgresql a lot these days, but I also still use MySQL.
I'm a big fan of PostgreSQL; I recently upgraded RubyForge to PostgreSQL 8.3 [blogs.com] and have been quite happy with the performance.
That said, I kind of feel like MySQL still has an edge on PostgreSQL in terms of replication - I know Slony is out there, but my perception of it is that it doesn't handle schema changes easily, and MySQL replication via binary log shipping is pretty straightforward. I hear the PostgreSQL guys are working on something for out of the box replication though, so we'll see....
Parent
Re: (Score:2)
Mind explaining why? Here, we use SQLite for apps with small numbers of users and small DB size. We use Postgres for large or high load databases. So where is the niche for MySQL?
Re: (Score:2)
People using canned frameworks that target MySQL?
Re:Thank you, Monty. (Score:4, Funny)
So where is the niche for MySQL?
Slashdot.
Parent
Re:Thank you, Monty. (Score:5, Interesting)
For anything that's going to be really compute-intensive, I don't usually use "any of the above," as I prefer to use a relational database only as a data warehouse, with large chunks of data being loaded into processing programs as big hash tables. In many cases, I'm able to process information many orders of magnitude faster by keeping it all in local memory under the umbrella of the program that's doing the calculations. These are special use cases, however, and don't apply to general database tasks.
Parent
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
> So where is the niche for MySQL?
See for example: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_Internet_forum_software_(PHP)#Data_storage [wikipedia.org]
Re:Thank you, Monty. (Score:5, Funny)
Parent
Sounds like a plan (Score:5, Insightful)
The same has happened to the Blogger founders after they were bought by Google. If you're a startup guy working for a 20,000 employee company is not going to cut it. And to make things worse you won't have control over the product you created anymore.
I'm surprised it took him so long to quit.
--
Can you say, piece of shit [mailto]?
Re:Sounds like a plan (Score:4, Funny)
Parent
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
MySQL had been out of startup mode for many years, and Widenius probably had a lot more control over the development of MySQL than Blogger's founders had over their baby.
That said, there is an obvious disconnect between MySQL's laid-back, decentralized corporate culture and Sun's bureaucratic, highly politicized management.
Re:Sounds like a plan (Score:4, Insightful)
I'm not an insider on either camp and I've been mostly using postgresql on my own projects.
But my sense is that Sun kept wanting to go opensource but MySQL wanted to directly monetize the product and not just be a free add on to sell hardware and other services.
This seemed to happen early on when MySQL announced some new features would not be opensourced shortly after acquisition, then Schwartz came back and spanked them into place.
Parent
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
I hadn't heard that (don't follow MySQL issues, even though I work at Sun) but it makes sense. JIS has been open sourcing other key software products (Solaris, Java), claiming that this would help him (as you say) sell hardware and services. He had to overcome a lot of resistance and skepticism to do this. He'd look really dumb if he allowed one prominent new acquisition to deviate from this model.
Re:Sounds like a plan (Score:5, Insightful)
Meanwhile, Monty Program Ab will be 'a true open-source company,' with only a small number of employees who 'strive to have fun together and share the profit we create.'
Until his product becomes HUGE and he sells his company to Sun again...
Parent
Re:Sounds like a plan (Score:5, Insightful)
If you're a startup guy working for a 20,000 employee company is not going to cut it. And to make things worse you won't have control over the product you created anymore.
I'm surprised it took him so long to quit.
You don't get it. When your start-up is acquired by big corp, it is usually their demand you stick for at least a year, instead of dumping your crap and taking a run with the money, which I'm sure he would have preferred. He did the year, finished his obligations, and leaves. Nothing to see, please move along.
Parent
sorry. (Score:4, Funny)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
A Monty Utopia? (Score:5, Insightful)
Meanwhile, Monty Program Ab will be 'a true open-source company,' with only a small number of employees who 'strive to have fun together and share the profit we create.'
This is all good until real money starts pouring in and someone wants/needs more money or claims they are more deserving than another or something along those lines. Then the "fun" arrangement becomes less fun and more bitter. Other things that can spoil the fun are if someone decides to wear only black turtlenecks or attempts to make himself into a god of some sort.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
And then Monty sells the company and IP to some big firm that likes the big money that's pouring in, and after a suitable transition period quits and goes on starts some other venture with like-minded folks for fun.
And I doubt Monty is going to be hurting for money, himself, if he keep
What about Drizzle? (Score:3, Interesting)
-B
Re: (Score:2)
Actually, having read the Wiki page, I'm not sure what the point of that project is. They seem to want to roll back all the progress that MySQL has made in the last couple of years towards becoming a useful database, and go back to 3.x/4.x days.
So, it's MySQL with even less features, but faster - don't we already have a BerkeleyDB?
Re:What about Drizzle? (Score:5, Informative)
Parent
Re:What about Drizzle? (Score:4, Informative)
Hi!
We are talking about finding a way to allow him to pull Drizzle code back into his tree. It is not a simple task though... Drizzle has been cleaned up since the fork (warnings removed, moved on to more of a C++ design, use of stdint, etc...), so he has to clean up his own tree as well before this can happen.
Cheers,
-Brian
Parent
A winning proposition. (Score:4, Interesting)
Startup: Check
1 out of 10 companies last the first year.
No dependable revenue stream: Check
You don't make money making Open Source Software, you make money supporting it / consulting services, packaging and distribution. Making software is expensive. Being a 'a true open-source company,' leads to little teeth to get a good competitive advantage.
Focus on Employee Happiness not productiveness: Check
Yea a productive employee is a Happy Employee, But a Happy Employee doesn't make them productive. Unfortunatly with work there are always the stinker jobs thar are not fun. You can't expect work to always be fun and to have fun at work.
Profit Sharing: Check
If you work harder then everyone else you should deserve more. But how to you fairly determine who is worth what. Bob program may make a lot of money. But bill spends his time helping out Bob in his product.
Small Size: Check
A Small company against the big guys. It will take a while to gain trust. If you start out big(ish) then you can actually get some automatic cred.
Starting in a bad economy: Check
Where is funding going to start how will you get a loan. If he does get one the banks are stupider then I thought.
Re:A winning proposition. (Score:5, Insightful)
Yeah, if I had to pick anyone to fail it would be the guy who cofounded MySQl and sold it for a billion dollars. You nailed it, I'm sure nothing his startup does will be successful or be worth money.
Parent
Re:A winning proposition. (Score:4, Insightful)
He filled a Gap in the market at the time. It is like getting stuck by lightning, Chances of filling that gap again is slim. MySQL success was that it wasn't a Full Open Source company. It had a closed Source branch too, which actually made the money (a business model).
Secondly it was made in a good economy, Dot Com boom period, where there was a need to get a good but affordable Rational Database system, Most of the guys at the time were very expensive, and not suited for lightweight databases needed for the web.
Third Linux, Apache, PHP success in the web market, putting MySQl in the middle of it.
Past success doesn't guarantee future success. And if you did make a lot of money you may get a big head and not focus clearly. Like most companies 2 parts luck to 1 part strategy.
Parent
Re:A winning proposition. (Score:5, Funny)
"Relational." "Rational" isn't a word that's often applied to MySQL.
Parent
Re:A winning proposition. (Score:5, Insightful)
You need to read your prospectuses: "Past performance is no indicator of future success."
Monty's not the golden goose; he will not lay golden eggs each time he squats. He is not the child of destiny, the master of The Street, the database Messiah. He's just a very naughty boy. Ok, maybe not. But he is a guy who created a good product, sold it to desperate overcapitalized suckers, and jumped ship just before the balloon collapsed and sent the economy screaming "Oh the Humanity" into the ground.
I wouldn't even credit him with a good sense of timing, if he thinks this is the time for a startup like he's proposing.
We shall see.
Parent
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
It's an excellent time for a startup if you have cash... he sold MySQL for a billion dollars!
Even Steve Jobs said "cash is king" just last week. Monty will be able to get whatever he needs cheaper than last year. Remember, that it takes 2-5 years to be an "overnight" success like the first MySql had. Recession is the perfect time to build a company if you can float the start up capital.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Why should he need a loan? He got 1 billion from selling his last company. He can use some of that as venture capital for his new project
Re:A winning proposition. (Score:4, Insightful)
Parent
Startups (Score:5, Interesting)
I've started a number of companies and you're saying a bunch of stuff that isn't really accurate.
You don't make money making Open Source Software, you make money supporting it / consulting services, packaging and distribution. Making software is expensive.
Actually making software can be pretty cheap, relatively speaking. Engineering costs for any pure software company are 10%-25% of total costs. Most of the cost is actually in sales, marketing, and administration. Don't take my word for it - look up the income statement of any publicly traded software company from Microsoft on down.
Being a 'a true open-source company,' leads to little teeth to get a good competitive advantage.
That doesn't necessarily have to be true at all. If you are the developer of a given piece of software and if companies will pay for services relating to that software, the primary developer is in the best position to provide those services since no one knows the software better. Furthermore it is impossible to undercut open source software on price so deep pockets don't help the big guy like they might if the company depended on revenue via a traditional software business model. Once the software is installed companies find it expensive to switch platforms which can mean recurring revenue and barriers to entry. That's certainly the basis for competitive advantage though not any assurance of such advantage.
If you work harder then everyone else you should deserve more.
Deserve? Maybe, but maybe not. The party that takes the most financial risk is who deserves and will get the most reward or take the biggest losses. Hard work is a factor but not even close to the biggest one. You don't make the biggest bucks unless you have the most skin in the game.
A Small company against the big guys. It will take a while to gain trust. If you start out big(ish) then you can actually get some automatic cred.
A guy with a track record of starting successful organizations (like MySQL) often gets to skip this step. The hardest company to start is usually the first one because no investor knows who the hell you are and they certainly don't trust you. Plus pretty much no one starts off big. Only guys with a track record are able to raise the large dollar amounts necessary to start "big".
Where is funding going to start how will you get a loan. If he does get one the banks are stupider then I thought.
Very, very few startups get funding from a bank. Banks want tangible assets as collateral for the money they loan and startups rarely have such assets. Usually funding comes from friends, family, angels [wikipedia.org], private equity, venture capital, government small business loans and various other sources. Banks, not so much.
Parent
Why did he allow sun to purchase MySQL? (Score:4, Interesting)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Maybe it was the one billion dollars they offered?
Re: (Score:2)
Okay someone has to say it... (Score:4, Funny)
Why didn't he go all the way and name it "Monty Program's Flying Code Circus"?!
Monty is just a dick. (Score:2, Insightful)
I'm sorry, as I really like MySQL, but, Monty's just taking his billion dollars and trashing Sun as a cover. The bugs that he talks about, that he complains about, all have dates back to 2001... so, he could have fixed that stuff before Sun even bought him out. The bottom line is, Monty's pointing the finger at Sun when the reality is, he's probably doesn't want to work for anyone other than himself, and is just looking for an excuse to cash out. If he would just say that, I think everyone would get it,
Hypocrite? (Score:3, Interesting)
Isn't this the guy who moved MySQL towards a commercial end before SUN stepped in and bought them?
Sounds to me like its all good and well, unless its someone else that is getting most of the cash.
If he wasn't the driving force behind it, then forget what i just said.
MySQL just isn't MySQL anymore... (Score:5, Interesting)
I have to admit that I am glad to see him leave Sun. I am developing an Open Source POS system and originally I was using MySQL as the database. I sent an email to MySQL about distribution questions and was then contacted by different sales people trying to talk me out of Open Sourcing my project. "Do you really want you competitors to have your POS code"... "How are you going make money off of Open Source". I felt bullied.
Understand that MySQL is only GPL (Free) if everything touching it is also GPL (or internal use only). If we distribute it with MySQL and make it commercial, we need to pay yearly for MySQL ($$$). That is understood when dealing with GPL software. Just don't try and talk me out of GPL'ing my code to line your pockets. Business models like this hurt the Open Source community and don't promote Open Source software!
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Maria, Maria, I just made a project, "Maria."
Re: (Score:2)
-B
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
With an experienced HR dept. you'll usually see a severability clause wherein, invalidating a contract in part does not invalidate the contract. Most of the time a company silly enough to want you to sign a non-compete IN CALIFORNIA is either too big to have a different process for every state, or too small (read: naive) to include severability, or has lumped it in with your employment contract (which will contain a severability clause). However, it's unenforceable in any case IN CALIFORNIA (probably some o
Re: (Score:2)
right on. unenforceable afaik.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)