TIME Names Mark Zuckerberg Person of Year 317
theodp writes "Sorry, Jeff Bezos and Bill Gates — there's a new geek kid in town. TIME magazine has selected Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg as its Person of the Year. Why? 'For connecting more than half a billion people and mapping the social relations among them; for creating a new system of exchanging information; and for changing how we all live our lives,' reasoned TIME At age 26, Zuckerberg is TIME's second-youngest selection, bested only by Charles Lindbergh. So what does Zuckerberg do for an encore — Academy Award, maybe?"
Good choice (Score:3, Interesting)
Facebook is kinda silly but it did enable me to reconnect with old College & high school mates I've not seen in 10-15 years (since graduation). Good invention.
Time cops out again (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:Julian Assange (Score:4, Interesting)
I'd rock if he won both the Pulitzer and the Nobel Peace Prize though, obviously those send a far more important message, they are just not as quite as timely. lol
In any case, wikileaks will "expose an ecosystem of corruption" in a "major U.S. bank" early next year, while presumably continuing to work their way through the U.S. embassy cables. So I'd imagine he'll get another shot. :)
Amnesty International declare him a prisoner of conscience [wikipedia.org] once more details emerge about the rape accusations.
Re:Julian Assange (Score:5, Interesting)
Applaud (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Julian Assange (Score:3, Interesting)
I'm not sure that's fair. Assange is important, but he just founded wikileaks, he didn't populate it with content. The editor in chief, the founder etc. of the new york times don't really deserve enormous personal accolades for the pentagon papers. Wikileaks is valuable because it facilitates what journalists should be doing, but the vast majority of what it releases is of no value (by volume), but I'm not sure it's quite fair to make him person of the year. PFC manning, assuming he actually leaked the material maybe. But Julian Assange and Mark Zuckerberg both don't deserve the accolade for the same reason, they just made a website that other people can upload stuff to. 3 or 4 years from now, someone else could come along with a better way to upload stuff and either of them could be forgotten in a heartbeat.
Since time does award person of the year to more than just one person, I think a better answer might have been to give it to Wikileaks supporters (use editorial staff to come up with a better name) rather than just Assange, or to Wikileaks as a whole. For showing us that most of what happens in diplomatic meetings is mind numbingly boring and best left unrepeated, but the bad stuff can be very very bad.
Re:orly? (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:Zuckerberg over Assange? (Score:5, Interesting)