Drupal 8 Development Begins — 15 Bugs At a Time

darthcamaro writes "It took nearly 3 years for the open source Drupal 7 content management system to hit general availability. The plan for pushing out Drupal 8 is to be faster. How are they going to do that? '"At no point in time will there be more than 15 critical bugs," Dries Buytaert, founder of Drupal said. "I will not pull in a big change if we know there are known bugs. This gives us the ability to do timely releases because we know at most the release is only 15 critical bugs away from being ready."'"

go faster by going slower?

[sparetiredesire]

Two bad side effects may be:

- Less merging (which will slow progress)
- More critical bugs triaged as non-critical to avoid blocking releases.

I like the Chrome team's ideas to have multiple branches, only do merges in one direction (towards more stable branches), and making features easily removable so they can be nuked if they are not stable enough to make a release. I'm not sure of a clean way to do the easy code disabling with PHP.

http://goo.gl/G2uDn

  In general, though, more merging is better than less merging. It will be interesting to see how this pans out for Drupal.

Awesome!

[/dev/trash]

This was like when they said that once there were no more critical bugs 6 and then 7 would be released. Which is what happened. They moved the level down to major and voila! No more critical bugs.

Now, a few days after 7 was released, 7 criticals appeared. 2 were new. The others? Just old bugs that could be bumped up again.

Re:Awesome!

[Anonymous Coward]

I've used Drupal 7 on some simple sites and it's sweet. There's a bit more debugging going into unknown territory, but it's worth the trade-offs if you're comfortable with Drupal and know beforehand what you can/cannot do in D7 yet. Some D7 modules are still waiting for a final release, like Relations, Media module, Internationalization and Drupal Commerce, but most are usable, and they're going to be kick-ass when they reach a final release.

Yay Droopal

Yeah seriously, WTF???

[cultiv8]

Look at who started using Drupal in the last year or two: The Economist [economist.com], The Grammys [grammy.com], Fast Company [fastcompany.com], The Examiner [examiner.com], House.gov (and all ~535 house websites) recently moved to Drupal [oreilly.com], Energy.gov [energy.gov], WhiteHouse.gov [whitehouse.gov], and here's a list of some 120 national governments [drupal.org] using Drupal.

But hey, Drupal only has 2% market share [builtwith.com] of all sites on the web, is being adopted by government and corporate organizations at a maddening pace, and just had their first major release in 3 years. There's no reason why this Drupal shit should be discussed on Slashdot.