Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Oracle Businesses Software Sun Microsystems Virtualization

Oracle To Stop Developing Sun Virtualization Technologies 145

hypnosec writes "Oracle will soon be announcing its decision to stop development of Sun virtualization technologies including Sun Ray Software and Hardware, Oracle Virtual Desktop Client, and Virtual Desktop Infrastructure (VDI) product lines. In an update to its support policies [Oracle support login required] for virtualization software and hardware, the database company has revealed that this decision is a result of its efforts to 'tightly align Oracle's future desktop virtualization portfolio investments with Oracle Corporation's overall core business strategy.'"
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Oracle To Stop Developing Sun Virtualization Technologies

Comments Filter:
  • Wait... (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday July 15, 2013 @06:28PM (#44289901)

    Oracle had a business strategy beyond "turn everything we touch into shit"?

  • That's a shame (Score:4, Insightful)

    by cold fjord ( 826450 ) on Monday July 15, 2013 @06:29PM (#44289917)

    The Sun Rays are pretty handing technology. I was surprised at how well they work.

  • Fuck you Oracle (Score:4, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday July 15, 2013 @06:30PM (#44289919)

    You will not expand your market, you will shrivel, only your bribes to executives will keep you afloat. You destroyed a company that contributed more to the furtherance of computing and society as a whole than you will ever be able to achieve with your selfish business strategies and practices.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Monday July 15, 2013 @06:30PM (#44289923)

    This coming on the heals of XenServer going open source.
    As soon as they realize the futile effort of supporting Sun hardware (Niagara, Sparc) and Solaris which are not selling well, they will also cease supporting them as well.
    Frankly, I think IBM would have been a better company to have owned Sun and its assets.

  • by ScottCooperDotNet ( 929575 ) on Monday July 15, 2013 @06:45PM (#44290057)

    Yet another reason to avoid helping Larry buy another yacht.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Monday July 15, 2013 @07:21PM (#44290303)

    A lot of the open source vbox stuff doesn't work well for me - USB and sharing under linux.

    Hence I am using the oracle version, which is unfortunate.

  • by Lunix Nutcase ( 1092239 ) on Monday July 15, 2013 @07:47PM (#44290515)

    You mean the same IBM that has sold/is selling off most of its assets?

  • by dbIII ( 701233 ) on Monday July 15, 2013 @08:11PM (#44290673)
    My theory is that thousands of dot bombs were buying Sun stuff in the boom and the success at that point didn't even depend on management turning up, so they got lazy and could not adapt to conditions after the crash. After that they couldn't even sell excellent stuff to people that really wanted it, not unless the customers had a hidden black-ops budget and orders to kill any approaching accountants on sight (the same problem IBM has with power stuff now). Increasing scarcity meant that a lot of commercial software no longer had the newer versions ported to Sparc and there wasn't really a way to justify buying Sun x86 gear. So Sun ended up trying to push a lot of good stuff at three times the price of stuff that was half as good, which meant people would just go out and buy two of the things that were half as good instead.
  • by oxdas ( 2447598 ) on Monday July 15, 2013 @08:12PM (#44290677)

    I don't think most people would hate Oracle if all they did was "keep what works and get rid of what doesn't." After all, Google dumps far more unprofitable products each year and they have a much better reputation on these boards. Oracle has earned its reputation by repeatedly attacking the very foundations of the tech industry in the (short-sighted) pursuit of higher profit margins from more vendor lock-in. This is the root of the anti-Oracle bias, not scrapping a few products.

  • by Rob_Bryerton ( 606093 ) on Monday July 15, 2013 @08:35PM (#44290937) Homepage
    Oracle has a huge, HUGE product portfolio. ERP, middle-ware, you name it.

    My opinion is that they bought Sun to gain ownership and control of Java, period. Full stop. Tons of their software relies heavily on it.

    I also think they will eventually discard or sell off every last bit of the former Sun properties/technologies (other than Java) not only because very little of it is relevant or profitable anymore, but also to discard the employees who develop and support these items.

    Oracle: Where Technology Goes to Die.
  • Re:Fuck you Oracle (Score:5, Insightful)

    by BitZtream ( 692029 ) on Monday July 15, 2013 @09:03PM (#44291253)

    For reference, what your post tells others is that you started this Internet thing late and missed the era where Sun was one of the big boys in the server and workstation arenas.

    Just because you were only around for their decline doesn't mean thats the way it always ways :)

  • Re:Fuck you Oracle (Score:4, Insightful)

    by ArhcAngel ( 247594 ) on Monday July 15, 2013 @11:01PM (#44292287)
    Actually the problem was that they WERE great. SUN's products were pretty bulletproof and once you had one configured for what it needed to do it did it. That combined with the bubble of 2000 where SUN was overextended on several fronts is what tore the company apart.

If all else fails, lower your standards.

Working...