Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Programming

The Curious Mind of Ada Lovelace 110

An anonymous reader writes "Going beyond the usual soundbites about Ada Lovelace, Amy Jollymore explores the life of the worlds first programmer: 'When I heard that Ada Lovelace Day was coming, I questioned myself, "What do I actually know about Ada Lovelace?" The sum total of my knowledge: Ada was the first woman programmer and the Department of Defense honored her contributions to computation in 1979 by naming its common programming language Ada.
A few Ada biographies later, I know Augusta Ada Lovelace to be an incredibly complex woman with a painful life story, one in which math, shame, and illness were continuously resurfacing themes. Despite all, Ada tirelessly pursued her passion for mathematics, making her contributions to computing undeniable and her genius all the more clear. Her accomplishments continue to serve as an inspiration to women throughout the world.'"
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

The Curious Mind of Ada Lovelace

Comments Filter:
  • by Arker ( 91948 ) on Tuesday October 15, 2013 @07:44PM (#45138037) Homepage

    "Her accomplishments continue to serve as an inspiration to women throughout the world."

    Not to women, but to people of both sorts throughout the world.

    Who wrote this tripe? Oh, right, an AC.

  • by gweihir ( 88907 ) on Tuesday October 15, 2013 @07:48PM (#45138071)

    That is incredible sexist. Mathematicians (and Computer Scientists) honor their great ones equally, gender does not play a role. A bit of digging finds a few female mathematicians that are in all respects treated as Mathematicians and honored for their discoveries, not for being (or not being) women.

    Maybe one reason why the gender-nonsense falls so obviously short here is that there is absolutely no gender component to the discoveries of these great people.

  • by EuclideanSilence ( 1968630 ) on Tuesday October 15, 2013 @08:13PM (#45138277)

    The first computers were humans. There was no first programmer.

    In terms of being a pioneer of formalizing and proving a nontrivial algorithm from axioms, Euclid can't get enough credit for his work like computing greatest common divisor. He was like the Knuth of the ancient world.

  • by Arker ( 91948 ) on Tuesday October 15, 2013 @08:24PM (#45138405) Homepage

    You're missing my point.

    I dont have to be gay to be inspired by Alan Turing. And I dont have to be female to be inspired by Ada Lovelace either.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 15, 2013 @09:00PM (#45138723)
    You added the 'just'. I suppose it's sexist in so far as reality is. The truth is that STEM fields are dominated by men and while that's changing, the women in those fields, especially the early ones are considered inspirational to women in the sense that they show that women too can make strides in these fields. Heck, in this case, she started the field. Nonetheless, she, like Madam Curie and others are considered role models to young women. It applies to race too. Regardless of policy, the fact that Barack Obama is president is inspirational to black people who now see that a black person can become president. Had Hilary won, the same would be true for women. As a white male, I find it odd, that other white males have such a hard time seeing things through other's eyes. I guess it's easy not to understand the lives of others when the world is run by others like yourself.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 15, 2013 @09:48PM (#45139145)

    Are you proposing that the creator of the difference engine, Charles Babbage, could not program and did not know how to program his own invention?

    Ada did not contribute anything, Charles exchanged letters with her, was most likely in love with her secretely, and as any man in love, gave her too much credit and projected the attributes he admires upon her, even though she had none.

  • by harperska ( 1376103 ) on Wednesday October 16, 2013 @12:41AM (#45140005)

    My understanding was that Babbage's own programs were more akin to today's Hello World in complexity, just as a proof of concept to show that his machine would work in the first place. Ada's program on the other hand was a complete implementation of an algorithm to compute a mathematical sequence (Bernoulli numbers) based on a mathematical formula provided by Babbage. So whether Babbage or Ada was the first programmer would depend on whether you consider Hello World to be a proper program or not.

  • by blancolioni ( 147353 ) on Wednesday October 16, 2013 @06:08AM (#45141089) Homepage

    Are you feeling bad because your gender was ignored? That's ... adorable.

Understanding is always the understanding of a smaller problem in relation to a bigger problem. -- P.D. Ouspensky

Working...