Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments
typodupeerror delete not in
  • Preferences

+-   Are Relational Databases Obsolete? on Thursday September 06 2007, @08:13AM jpkunst

Submitted by jpkunst on Thursday September 06 2007, @08:13AM
database
jpkunst writes "Computerworld reports that Michael Stonebraker, who co-created the Ingres and Postgres technology as a researcher at UC Berkeley in the early 1970s, argues in The Database Column that the current major relational DBMSs (DB2, SQLserver, Oracle) "should be considered legacy technology, more than a quarter of century in age and 'long in the tooth'.". His prediction is "that column stores will take over the warehouse market over time, completely displacing row stores"."
submission
This discussion was created for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.

Are Relational Databases Obsolete? 0 Comments More /

 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
Search
Solutions are obvious if one only has the optical power to observe them over the horizon. -- K.A. Arsdall

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the Poster. The Rest © 1997-2009 Geeknet, Inc.