Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments
typodupeerror delete not in
  • Preferences

+-   Is UML really dead or only cataleptic? on Saturday May 31 2008, @06:35AM danielstoner

Submitted by danielstoner on Saturday May 31 2008, @06:35AM
programming
danielstoner writes "Recently UML was pronounced dead as a tool for all programming needs by an article posted on Little Tutorials: 13 reasons for UML's descent into darkness The author suggests UML was killed among others by greed, heavy process and committee design. Is UML really a fading technology? Is it useful beyond a whiteboard notation for designers? Is there any value in code generation?"
submission
This discussion was created for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.

Is UML really dead or only cataleptic? 0 Comments More /

 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
Search
For I do not do the good I want, but the evil I do not want is what I do. -- Paul of Tarsus, (Saint Paul)

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the Poster. The Rest © 1997-2009 Geeknet, Inc.