Is UML really dead or only cataleptic?

Slashdot

Is UML really dead or only cataleptic? 0

Submitted by danielstoner on Saturday May 31 2008, @06:35AM

danielstoner writes "Recently UML was pronounced dead as a tool for all programming needs by an article posted on Little Tutorials: 13 reasons for UML's descent into darkness The author suggests UML was killed among others by greed, heavy process and committee design. Is UML really a fading technology? Is it useful beyond a whiteboard notation for designers? Is there any value in code generation?"

This discussion was created for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Is UML really dead or only cataleptic?

Load All Comments

Search 0 Comments Log In/Create an Account

Comments Filter:

All
Insightful
Informative
Interesting
Funny

There may be more comments in this discussion. Without JavaScript enabled, you might want to turn on Classic Discussion System in your preferences instead.

It is impossible to make anything foolproof because fools are so ingenious.

Is UML really dead or only cataleptic? More Login

Is UML really dead or only cataleptic?