Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).

×
Databases

+ - Can 'Slacker DBs' Win Over Old-Guard DB Admins? ->

Submitted by
snydeq
snydeq writes "Non-relational upstarts — tools that tack the letters 'db' onto a 'pile of code that breaks with the traditional relational model' — have grabbed attention in large part because they willfully ignore many of the rules that codify the hard lessons learned by the old database masters. Doing away with JOINs and introducing phrases like 'eventual consistency,' these 'slacker DBs' offer greater simplicity and improved means of storing data for Web apps, yet remain toys in the eyes of old guard DB admins. 'This distinction between immediate and eventual consistency is deeply philosophical and depends on how important the data happens to be,' writes InfoWorld's Peter Wayner, who let down his old-guard leanings and tested Amazon SimpleDB, Apache CouchDB, Google App Engine, and Persevere to see how they are affecting the evolution of modern IT."
Link to Original Source
This discussion was created for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Can 'Slacker DBs' Win Over Old-Guard DB Admins?

Comments Filter:

Don't tell me how hard you work. Tell me how much you get done. -- James J. Ling

Working...