One of the articles speaks about a guy who spoke at Defconf and promoted giving those attending the Republicats convention a hard time.
What surprised me is that the journalist did not have any problems with having the guy thrown out simply because the guy's speech was controversial. They justified censorship by stating that they had to stop him for his protection. Since when does a person in America have to abdicate his own personal responsibility and be protected for his own speech?
Who defines what's sedition? Do you remember an old document that argues that when a government has become too corrupt and opressive, its citizens might be justified in overthrowing it by any means necessary?
As far as I am concerned, the Republicats are guilty of treason themselves for misleading Americans into war, selling the country to the Chinese by borrowing hugely from them and passing the Patriot Act, which represents the biggest erosion in civil liberties that we have seen in t
The Clintons sold out the the Chinese. And the jury is still out on the "misleading Americans into war" and the evidence currently points to the war being the best call on the information currently available. Further absence of evidence is NOT the same as evidence of absence and we've only got a few hundred thousand square miles of desert we haven't searched yet.
My vote is that we find more evidence of either and active or temporarily on hold WMD program.
Nonsense. The Bush Administration has borrowed more heavily from the Chinese than any other administration. It has also plunged the country into debt and began squandering social security to justify a war and a tax cut for the rich that the country could simply not afford.
There simply are no WMDs. Fox News has conviced some Americans that there is a hell of a lot of sand in Iraq. Current imaging technology is very effective at finding WMDs once you are on the ground.
where is your proof? You spout about china and the bush administration, but yet offer no proof.
the WMD do exist however. Fox news is the best news on the planet. you are a worthless nothing. you probably got beat up in high school quite a bit. wussy. you cry to mama and throw a temper tantrum. the rest of us will make your desicions for you pissant.
I see that you had nothing to say about the Patriot Act.
You pick your fights selectively. Smart...
So it is ok to tell people that you have fairly specific knowledge about the existence of WMD and then to claim that you don't know where they are. You just need time. What kind of time threshold would work for you to accept that there are WMDs?
Finally, it is misleading when you try to blur the difference in the mind of the American public betwen Al-Qaeda and Hussein's Iraq by blaming the latter for the crim
And the jury is still out on the "misleading Americans into war" and the evidence currently points to the war being the best call on the information currently available.
What jury are we going by? It seems that much of the government has admitted to extremely poor intelligence on the matter. Also, you must prove a case for war with solid evidence. You can run around invading countries because you can't prove they don't have large weapon systems until you sieve every grain of sand.
the only jury that is still out is from people who haven't looked at most of the evidence, usually political party enthusiasts and government shills.
Here, I am not flaming you, just proving some points because this is THE important subject today.
Please provide any url of a closeup of the plane that hit wtc tower 2 that shows passenger windows on the plane. All I have seen, even direct from broadcasters websites, clearly shows a modified cargo plane, not a passenger jet. Also please provide any rational go
Maybe this is a troll but I'll help you out a little anyway.
Google gives me basically two main shots of the second plane. The first is pretty good images of the bottom of the aircraft, which isn't useful to find passenger windows because they can't be seen from that angle. The second shot is poor-focus small-profile images of the side. From those I can't tell anything at all, because there aren't enough pixels. There are, what, something like 40 windows along the side of a 737, so I'd need at least 150
About one of the articles posted... (Score:1, Interesting)
What surprised me is that the journalist did not have any problems with having the guy thrown out simply because the guy's speech was controversial. They justified censorship by stating that they had to stop him for his protection. Since when does a person in America have to abdicate his own personal responsibility and be protected for his own speech?
As far as I can tell f
Re:About one of the articles posted... (Score:0)
Constitution much?
Re:About one of the articles posted... (Score:1, Flamebait)
Who defines what's sedition? Do you remember an old document that argues that when a government has become too corrupt and opressive, its citizens might be justified in overthrowing it by any means necessary?
As far as I am concerned, the Republicats are guilty of treason themselves for misleading Americans into war, selling the country to the Chinese by borrowing hugely from them and passing the Patriot Act, which represents the biggest erosion in civil liberties that we have seen in t
Re:About one of the articles posted... (Score:1)
My vote is that we find more evidence of either and active or temporarily on hold WMD program.
Re:About one of the articles posted... (Score:0)
There simply are no WMDs. Fox News has conviced some Americans that there is a hell of a lot of sand in Iraq. Current imaging technology is very effective at finding WMDs once you are on the ground.
I suggest you give it up or find a bett
Re:About one of the articles posted... (Score:-1)
the WMD do exist however. Fox news is the best news on the planet. you are a worthless nothing. you probably got beat up in high school quite a bit. wussy. you cry to mama and throw a temper tantrum. the rest of us will make your desicions for you pissant.
Re:About one of the articles posted... (Score:0)
You pick your fights selectively. Smart...
So it is ok to tell people that you have fairly specific knowledge about the existence of WMD and then to claim that you don't know where they are. You just need time. What kind of time threshold would work for you to accept that there are WMDs?
Finally, it is misleading when you try to blur the difference in the mind of the American public betwen Al-Qaeda and Hussein's Iraq by blaming the latter for the crim
Re:About one of the articles posted... (Score:2)
And the jury is still out on the "misleading Americans into war" and the evidence currently points to the war being the best call on the information currently available.
What jury are we going by? It seems that much of the government has admitted to extremely poor intelligence on the matter. Also, you must prove a case for war with solid evidence. You can run around invading countries because you can't prove they don't have large weapon systems until you sieve every grain of sand.
Weapons of Mass Destr
Re:About one of the articles posted... (Score:0)
Here, I am not flaming you, just proving some points because this is THE important subject today.
Please provide any url of a closeup of the plane that hit wtc tower 2 that shows passenger windows on the plane. All I have seen, even direct from broadcasters websites, clearly shows a modified cargo plane, not a passenger jet. Also please provide any rational go
Re:About one of the articles posted... (Score:0)
Google gives me basically two main shots of the second plane. The first is pretty good images of the bottom of the aircraft, which isn't useful to find passenger windows because they can't be seen from that angle. The second shot is poor-focus small-profile images of the side. From those I can't tell anything at all, because there aren't enough pixels. There are, what, something like 40 windows along the side of a 737, so I'd need at least 150