Maybe this isn't out the of realm of conceivability to others, but it was to me...Oracle is a software company (one that runs a lot on Sun hardware), and suddenly becoming a hardware company has got to be a daunting challenge, regardless of who you are or how smart you are.
The implications are staggering across the board. Maybe Oracle decides they don't want to the hardware, just Java and MySQL (...they got it, finally), but then all that Sun hardware and Solaris...? Or maybe they want to make Solaris/Sun h
A Sun/Apple merger would have made sense ten years ago, when Apple had a great desktop UNIX but with an ageing kernel and running on CPUs from a company that couldn't meet their demands. Sun had a decent server UNIX, with a nice kernel, but no real presence on the (corporate) desktop. OS X on a Solaris kernel, on SPARC would have been very nice, and could have scaled right down to the SPARC v8 systems designed for handheld systems up to the v9 cores designed for massive SMP servers. Steve Jobs still hasn't forgiven Sun for abandoning OpenStep though, so it was never very likely.
The real shame is that, in the mid '90s, Sun put together an incredible hardware and software stack for mobile devices. A few bits of it made it into Java, but most of it never went to market. If Sun had licensed the software and sold the hardware to ODMs then they would almost certainly not have been looking for a buyer now.
I don't think OS9 was a UNIX-system. Ten years ago, that was Apples operating system.
Mac OS X Server 1.0 was released on March 16, 1999. Naturally, it wasn't a desktop OS; however, it was still NextStep (and therefore UNIX) based, and Apple did have it.
Why do you find more likely a merger of a desktop company with a server company, than the merger of two complementary server companies.
For the foreseeable future, nobody is going to pry the corporate desktop market away from Microsoft.
But in the corporate data center, merging the most popular enterprise database (Oracle), the most mature, advanced and popular Unix OS (Solaris/SPARC) and matched hardware, along with Java app servers and middleware to go head to head with IBM Global Services is going to be very profitable.
Wow. Just Wow. (Score:5, Insightful)
Maybe this isn't out the of realm of conceivability to others, but it was to me...Oracle is a software company (one that runs a lot on Sun hardware), and suddenly becoming a hardware company has got to be a daunting challenge, regardless of who you are or how smart you are.
The implications are staggering across the board. Maybe Oracle decides they don't want to the hardware, just Java and MySQL (...they got it, finally), but then all that Sun hardware and Solaris...? Or maybe they want to make Solaris/Sun h
Re:Wow. Just Wow. (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:Wow. Just Wow. (Score:5, Interesting)
A Sun/Apple merger would have made sense ten years ago, when Apple had a great desktop UNIX but with an ageing kernel and running on CPUs from a company that couldn't meet their demands. Sun had a decent server UNIX, with a nice kernel, but no real presence on the (corporate) desktop. OS X on a Solaris kernel, on SPARC would have been very nice, and could have scaled right down to the SPARC v8 systems designed for handheld systems up to the v9 cores designed for massive SMP servers. Steve Jobs still hasn't forgiven Sun for abandoning OpenStep though, so it was never very likely.
The real shame is that, in the mid '90s, Sun put together an incredible hardware and software stack for mobile devices. A few bits of it made it into Java, but most of it never went to market. If Sun had licensed the software and sold the hardware to ODMs then they would almost certainly not have been looking for a buyer now.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Mac OS X Server 1.0 was released on March 16, 1999. Naturally, it wasn't a desktop OS; however, it was still NextStep (and therefore UNIX) based, and Apple did have it.
Re: (Score:2)
You have to go back more than 10 years.
In the late 80s/early 90s Apple had some corporate marketshare, but by 1999 that was long gone and Apple was in fruity iMac mode.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Why do you find more likely a merger of a desktop company with a server company, than the merger of two complementary server companies.
Re: (Score:2)
Why do you find more likely a merger of a desktop company with a server company, than the merger of two complementary server companies.
For the foreseeable future, nobody is going to pry the corporate desktop market away from Microsoft.
But in the corporate data center, merging the most popular enterprise database (Oracle), the most mature, advanced and popular Unix OS (Solaris/SPARC) and matched hardware, along with Java app servers and middleware to go head to head with IBM Global Services is going to be very profitable.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)