Quantum Computing is, at this time, still complete bullshit. There is no conclusive evidence it will ever scale to any useful size. There is a ton of indication it will not, and that is a "not ever in this universe", not a "may require 100, 1000 or 10'000 years to get there". The whole idea is theoreticians with no practical insights into computing running amok and others funding "magic" that they do not understand.
Yes, I get that this will be down-modded because too many people are incapable of facing real
Irrelevant (Score:1, Interesting)
Quantum Computing is, at this time, still complete bullshit. There is no conclusive evidence it will ever scale to any useful size. There is a ton of indication it will not, and that is a "not ever in this universe", not a "may require 100, 1000 or 10'000 years to get there". The whole idea is theoreticians with no practical insights into computing running amok and others funding "magic" that they do not understand.
Yes, I get that this will be down-modded because too many people are incapable of facing real
Re:Irrelevant (Score:2, Troll)
It'll probably get downmodded because the chances that you know better is a benchmark for "not ever in this universe".
Re:Irrelevant (Score:4, Insightful)
Haha, yes, let's go back and look at your original post and find all the arguments and insights. Oops, there are none.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Agreed. Your original post is a classic example.
Re: (Score:2)
Those that have no arguments and no actual insights go AdHominem. A time-honored tradition among the clueless.
But didn't you just do the same thing?