Call me old fashioned, but I don't see why anyone but a search engine like google would need anything like a petabyte. You can have only so much useful information about anything. Sounds to me like, fill your garage with sh1t, build a bigger garage.
Petabytes are actually pretty common in the sciences. I visited NCAR (National Center for Atmospheric Research [ucar.edu]) in Boulder five years ago and their main database was in the 2PB region even then. I'm sure it's a lot larger today
The LHC will generate several PB of data per year, as will the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope [lsst.org]. These projects aren't all that uncommon.
Oh, come on. (Score:5, Interesting)
Science! (Score:5, Informative)
The LHC will generate several PB of data per year, as will the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope [lsst.org]. These projects aren't all that uncommon.
Re:Science! (Score:2)
The LHC will generate several PB of data per year, as will the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope [lsst.org]. These projects aren't all that uncommon.
Shit, I'm working on those 2 projects. I'd better ask for a bigger hard drive to management...