Writing Documentation 583
"So far, I like aft,
mostly because it is simple to use, and gives me nice result as HTML.
Unfortunately HTML is not enough, since I also need a very good looking
printable version.
There are alternatives like DocBook,
which I could not get to work and udo
(Page is German, get the translation from the fish) which I have not yet looked
into very closely.
Then of course there is TeX and any number of WYSIWY-won't-G word
processors. I haven't used TeX much, I only tried my luck in writing
a few letters (and found out that it is not suitable for this). I went
through hell when I wrote larger documents with various versions of
MS Word and I am not really a fan of Star Office even though version
5.2 has not yet crashed on me (however 6.0 beta did). KWord, part of
KOffice doesn't seem to be stable enough yet.
I would prefer a simple ASCII only format as the source for being
converted to more complex formats anyway, especially since it could
be easily put into CVS for version management (Anybody tried that
with MS-Word documents? Don't!)
As all these projects show I am not the first one faced with this
problem. I wonder what experiences Slashdot readers have had with
these and other packages?"
Re:And after you're done? (Score:2, Funny)
Is that because you'll sit back and eat lots of twinkies? I think the word you are looking for is expendable.
obvious joke, sorry (Score:3, Funny)
...In the trial of the
graspee
Re:PEBKAC (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Ten Reasons Why TeX/LaTeX is Better than Word (Score:3, Funny)
Unless you count the liveware virus that makes you want to escape every period\. I'd call that pretty macro\.