Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!


Forgot your password?

New GNUstep Releases 16

Martin writes: "GNUstep has reached release 0.7.5 of the GUI libraries as well as version 1.1.0 of its base library. Some enhancements include anti-aliased font support, spell checking, a great key-bindings system, a tool for inline Obj-C documentation, further Mac OS X compatibility, and much more ..."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

New GNUstep Releases

Comments Filter:
  • by Adrian Voinea ( 216087 ) <adrian@g[ ]ro ['ds.' in gap]> on Sunday February 03, 2002 @06:06PM (#2947763) Homepage Journal
    There are a few mirrors of the GNUstep pages. Choose the one that is closest to you:
    Georgia, USA [403forbidden.net], France, Europe [sbuilders.com], Germany, Europe [peanuts.org].

    GNUstep is an attempt to provide an Object-Oriented application development framework and tool set for use on a wide variety of computer platforms. GNUstep is based on the original OpenStep specification provided by NeXT, Inc. (now Apple).

    GNUstep is written in Objective-C, the language from which the Signal/Slot concept of Qt was borrowed. Objective-C is basically standard C with one single syntax addition and a dozen or so additional keywords. That is all that is needed to implement an object system that is more powerful than that of that other language. In Objective-C all method calls are done via a mechanism that is similar to, but slighly more efficient than, the signal/slot mechanism of Qt. This has some interesting implications for the implementation of remote method invocation, on object serialization and some other things that are very hip in a Corba context.

    Like Nextstep, GNUstep has a record of technical excellence that even today is unmatched by any other object framework, and of abysmal PR performance (also unmatched :-). A current commercial implementation of the same API (same API, different code) is the foundation of MacOS X.
  • Re:Can I? (Score:1, Informative)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday February 05, 2002 @03:01PM (#2957019)
    PI mmx, 166 to 233 mhz: $5-15 on ebay
    edo sticks, 8 to 32 mb per: $10-30 new, $cheap on ebay
    not having to look at twm/fvwm any more: priceless


    I used a p166 w/ 48 ram for quite a while with Blackbox. It ran like a charm and looked good to boot... GNUstep, sort of like KDE and GNOME, relies on background daemons for some of it's functionality, so there will be more overhead than a "plain" windowmanager. When I played with it I found it to be less resource intensive than either KDE or GNOME. YMWV.
  • Yes (Score:2, Informative)

    by nicestepauthor ( 307146 ) on Wednesday February 06, 2002 @11:20AM (#2961412) Homepage
    The window manager for GNUstep is WindowMaker, and it is lightweight to run on anything. I have run it on a 486/33 with 16 meg of RAM. I also use WindowMaker every day on a Pentium I. with 64 (formerly 32) meg of RAM. It is definitely lighter weight than KDE or GNOME, both of which should still be useable on your Pentium.

Executive ability is deciding quickly and getting somebody else to do the work. -- John G. Pollard