FLOSS Developer Survey Results Published 158
grex writes "The FLOSS (Free/Libre/Open Source Software) study from the University of Maastricht has published its final report. One of its five parts is the developer survey based basically on developers from the European Union. Results show that Debian is the preferred distribution, GNOME the desktop the majority choose and vi more popular than Emacs. But this survey also handles economic, law-related and motivation aspects among developers that make it very interesting to read."
Vi more popular than Emacs ? (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Vi more popular than Emacs ? (Score:1, Insightful)
Re:Vi more popular than Emacs ? (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Vi more popular than Emacs ? (Score:2, Funny)
>use emacs because of power and ease of use...
Most reprehinsible programmers I know would rather use Visual Studio because of power and ease of use...
Re:Vi more popular than Emacs ? (Score:2, Insightful)
Of course, being a vi user myself should show that I have no personal reasons to point this out.
Re:Vi more popular than Emacs ? (Score:2)
vi [google.com]: 25,400,000. Search took 0.11 seconds.
emacs [google.com]: 2,900,000. Search took 0.08 seconds.
Looks like a factor of 10 to me.
Re:Vi more popular than Emacs ? (Score:2)
EMACS isn't a Roman numeral nor is it anyone's name (hopefully).
Re:Vi more popular than Emacs ? (Score:1)
+vi +editor 972,000
So, approximately 3:1 in favor of vi.
FWIW, I use XEmacs.
-Kevin
Re:Vi more popular than Emacs ? (Score:1)
O'Rielly's vi books sell more than Emacs, approximate 2:1 ratio. Several years ago there was a vi vs. Emacs laser tag or something at an open-source conference - Team vi had a near 2:1 size advantage over Team Emacs, size meaning number of people, not physical measurements. Oh, and Tim O'Rielly is an Emacs defector, now uses vi.
see also: http://www.oreilly.com/ask_tim/unix_editor.html [oreilly.com]
Re:Vi more popular than Emacs ? (Score:1)
Personally, I'm a SciTE [scintilla.org] fan.
Re:Vi more popular than Emacs ? (Score:1)
No you don't. It's on the start up screen along with the key sequence to start the tutorial.
Re:Vi more popular than Emacs ? (Score:1)
Re:Vi more popular than Emacs ? (Score:1)
Re:Vi more popular than Emacs ? (Score:1)
Re:Vi more popular than Emacs ? (Score:1)
Re:Vi more popular than Emacs ? (Score:1)
(1) more popular for what use? For example, vi is very popular for making jokes. (Which is handled well by the emacs joke-mode command, btw.)
(2) did they take into account the fact that being popular for an emacs user is worth 1.258 popularity points and being popular to a vi user is worth a mere
Sorry, got to run, I have a turkey in the emacs that's about done. I can't wash the dishes till I get it out.
Re:Vi more popular than Emacs ? (Score:1)
That explains why they love Vi.
Gnome over KDE? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Gnome over KDE? (Score:2)
Well, the statistical uncertainty on a sample of 2200 is sqrt(2200) which is approximately 47, and 2% of 2200 is 44, so we are talking about slightly less than a 1 sigma effect. So you're right, it's not statistically significant.
Re:Gnome over KDE? (Score:2)
Re:Gnome over KDE? (Score:2)
I think it's safe to say that Gnome/Gtk is more widely used when you take the apps into account.
Re:Gnome over KDE? (Score:1)
Perhaps some can explain to me... (Score:3, Funny)
Or then again, maybe I am just missing something...
Oh god! (Score:1, Funny)
I'm AVERAGE !
noooooo!
Is this some kind of a joke?!?!? (Score:4, Funny)
A review of Vim [slashdot.org] to get people primed for an editor war.
Next, we read about Which is the better browser [slashdot.org], to get that war going.
Now, we just put all our eggs in one basket for an all out flamewar that includes distros, editors, Window Managers, and even will bring up the euro vs. american flamewars.
Sweet lord, people! Wonder why Linux is still having trouble competing with MS? Could it possibly be internal conflicts?
Re:Is this some kind of a joke?!?!? (Score:1, Funny)
Re:Is this some kind of a joke?!?!? (Score:2)
But our standards are good! We have so many to choose from!
Re:Is this some kind of a joke?!?!? (Score:2)
Wisecrack, but a lot of truth in there.
Many standards. Better odds of being able to find a good fit.
The real payout comes from such as using KDE apps on a GNOME desktop and using GNOME apps on a KDE desktop. The BSDs running native LINUX binaries, sometimes better than under LINUX it seems some claim.
Anybody particularly concerned by internal confilicts will be buying support from such as Red Hat, IBM or Sun.
Executive summary (Score:5, Funny)
So what you're saying is, these guys spent a ton of money to produce a giant troll ? Did they happen to say to whether Britney Spears is hotter than Shakira, or which Star Trek TV series was best ?
Re:Executive summary (Score:1)
Re:Executive summary (Score:1)
>Don't forget the venerable Death Star vs
>Enterprise debate
"Yes, Jackie, you're right. The Fonz could beat up Bruce Lee."
--Michael Kelso
A Dangerous Report... (Score:2, Funny)
Doctor: Yes, what is it?
Patient: I have his nagging pain here, is there anything you can do?
Doctor: Let me see... HOLY CRAP! (cough) Well uh... let me put it to you straight. You seem to have a Gnome [gnome.org] stuck inbetween your teeth. I'd get the FLOSS [infonomics.nl] out, but I don't think it'd help your problem. Perhaps we should knock your teeth out and replace them all with KDE bridges.
Re:Who cares about vi versus emacs? (Score:3, Funny)
Who *doesn't* use Word to code and edit configuration files?
Re:Who cares about vi versus emacs? (Score:2)
So that's what screws up the Registry.
Re:Who cares about vi versus emacs? (Score:2)
I don't know anybody that uses Vi or Emacs... both are nasty and inhospitable. Personally, I prefer Midnight Commander for all my programming.
Re:Who cares about vi versus emacs? (Score:2)
And for the file manager... I've been a Norton Commander (and clones) convert since my dad introduced me to it, circa 1988.
Back on subject... You _can_ save a your work from Word as a textfile, but nobody I know does this, because it's not the right tool for the job. Notepad (when you've got nothing else as a real text editor) is better in this respect (if only it could be made to understand Unix EOL...).
Re:Who cares about vi versus emacs? (Score:1)
Re:Who cares about vi versus emacs? (Score:1)
Does that compiler then also interpret the formatting? Such as
Italics = "odd code, don't mess with it too much while optimizing, as it might break"
Bold = "yes, I know what I mean, so please shut up and compile this"
Underlined = "I'm not quite sure if this is right - please compile this in pedantic mode."
BTW, why is the <u> tag not allowed in slashdot comments?
Re:Who cares about vi versus emacs? (Score:2)
>accepts MS word documents?
Every version of MS WOrd I've ever used has a "save as text" option.
Your compilers DO take text, right?
-l
Re:Who cares about vi versus emacs? (Score:1)
Because it's ugly, and the same purpose can be served by italics or bold.
Re:Who cares about vi versus emacs? (Score:1)
Re:Who cares about vi versus emacs? (Score:2)
I use emacs for Java development. I also build and run and debug the java application using emacs. My co-worker also used emacs for browsing the web and email! MS Word is a word processor and ONLY a word processor. Don't even compare the two.
If you don't know much about emacs, there is an option for you - don't say anything about it!
Re:MOD PARENT DOWN (Score:1)
(Ah, and to the lameness filter: I'm not yelling myself, I just quote yelling.)
This is shit (Score:2, Insightful)
The industry produces seriously flawed studies. This goes to prove that the open-source world can too !
Re:This is shit (Score:1)
Lies, Damn Lies, Statistics, and Studies
Re:This is shit (Score:1)
Re:This is shit (Score:1)
Another excellent addition... Now where did that article on that AMD chip go?
Re:This is shit (Score:1)
Re:This is shit (Score:3, Insightful)
As for the input being from voluntary users; you think they should have rounded up a few thousand people off the street, at gun point, and asked their opinioin? You're not making sense.
It is an excellent report, regardless of your stand on open source. It would have been better if they could have had a larger sampling but, this is not always possible due to time or budgetary constraints.
Re:This is shit (Score:1)
Next you're going to argue for the robustness of the Slashdot Poll, aren't you?
Re:This is shit (Score:2)
No, they should have picked a few people at random and offered significant incentives to get a good response rate (an entry into a raffle plus an explanation of why their contribution would be helpful might be sufficient).
No, increasing the size of the sample wouldn't have helped; if you work out the statistics, I suspect you'd find that the size of their sample was already much higher than necessary. It's the quality of the sample that counts. Subtle biases in the choice of people that responded (in this case, they were much more likely to get people that visited certain websites) cause inaccuracies that no increase in sample size would help.
Consider two surveys of preferences on presidential candidates; survey A was based on interviewing 200 people chosen uniformly at random from the set of registered voters; survey B was based on interviewing 2000 attendees of a Democratic convention; which result will be more accurate? The biases created by the self-selecting sample in this case may be more subtle than that, but I can think of some (I'm sure you can too), and I suspect a survey based on a more carefully chosen sample would give very different results.
--Bruce F.
Most free software developers have a girlfriend (Score:4, Funny)
It's true. Look at the study.
Now, if we compare this to /., where approximately six people have a girlfriend, and half of them are girls, we must conclude that nobody on /. actually does anything useful.
<G>
Re:Most free software developers have a girlfriend (Score:1)
I have no point here, I just like saying "I could more easily believe that two Yankee professors would lie than that stones would fall from heaven."
(In any case, I think that all that we have really discovered for certain is that "most people who responded to this survey and claimed to be free software developers also claimed to be male and to have a significant other".)
Now that, I can't quibble with.
Oh Duh! (Score:1)
Now they have good taste in editors vi rules! but poor taste in desktops. Gnome oh yuck, it is so five minutes ago.
They need a better survey (Score:2, Troll)
99% Males
40% Single
Hmmmmm
Back to the topic, I don't think that the sample of the population makes for a good survey
Debian as the favorite Linux distribution??? Gimme a break!
Gnome?!?!?!?!?!?!?!
I can't stop laughing!!!!
These people must also work for Enron
Re:They need a better survey (Score:1)
Re:They need a better survey (Score:2)
another 20% lied.
ITS OFFICIAL! (Score:5, Funny)
q
Q
Re:ITS OFFICIAL! (Score:1)
Re:ITS OFFICIAL! (Score:2, Funny)
Ctrl-Shift-Meta-A Alt-Q.
Re:ITS OFFICIAL! (Score:1)
CVSr ------------------
r on HP ^X^Z^Z^ZzzZZ
I taunted him for a few days after that, and then taught him him to exit vi properly.
Slashdot Math (Score:1)
GNOME the desktop the majority choose
Not to nitpick, but since when did 33% constitute a majority? FYI, Gnome leads the poll at 33%, with KDE closely behind with 30%.
Re:Slashdot Math (Score:1)
Re:Slashdot Math (Score:1)
Re:Slashdot Math (Score:1)
Re:Slashdot Math (Score:1)
Re:Slashdot Math (Score:1)
Re:Slashdot Math (Score:1)
But the point still stands. If there are more than two choices in a survey, then the most popular doesn't require a 50% share to 'win'. But then, you probably understood this to begin with. Right?
Christ (Score:1, Troll)
Debian over Red Hat?
VI over Emacs?
Gnome over KDE????
These are the worst representations from the open source community. Didn't anyone tell the people of the EU that they are free and they do have a choice. Don't they know that they can choose from the much better options and the Open Source software is all about the freedom of choice? Those poor oppressed bastards are suffering under the worst of open source and they say they like it.
Flawed Survey (Score:5, Insightful)
The staggering support for Debian (48%!) only proves that Debian developers are more successful in recruiting other Debian developers to participate in bogus online survey's. This isn't a dig against Debian, it's a dig against the silly methodology of this study.
This survey, despite its seemingly thoroughness, is no more valid than the weekly Slashdot Poll. The only conclusion that can be drawn from this survey is that Debian, GNOME and vi users are more likely to participate in a self-selected survey than Redhat, SuSE, Mandrake, KDE and emacs users.
Re:Flawed Survey (Score:1)
You can see here [infonomics.nl] where it was announced (there are more, but that's where I know of).
Re:Flawed Survey (Score:1)
In fact, how can any poll claim any validity without including Cowboy Neal as an option?
Self-selected sample (Score:5, Insightful)
Debian Weekly News comments on this in their latest issue [debian.org]:
Re:Self-selected sample (Score:2, Informative)
OTOH, if you have a look at other surveys (WIDI [berlios.de] -
final report [tu-berlin.de]), you'll see that Debian is among developers the preferred distribution. WIDI was announced in Slashdot (main page), Heise.de and several other news sites that aren't related to the Debian project.
Re:Self-selected sample (Score:2)
Other survey results... (Score:5, Funny)
59.3% of Linux users prefer 'slender, young looking' anime babes to 'busty, voluptuous' anime babes.
only 22.3% of Linux users really think Natalie Portman is all the good looking, even in tight white spandex. Most were just thankful that JarJar only got 2 scenes.
93.2% of Linux users who read Slashdot have JonKatz permanently filtered.
32.3% - Boxers
44.1% - Tighty Whiteys
22.3% - Flappin' in the wind, baby!
62% of Linux users think that 'man' is a threatening name for a documentation application since it's vaguely homoerotic.
58.3% of Linux users think that all polls about free software are orchestrated by Microsoft and are unwilling to trust the results, even if they are positive.
Re:Other survey results... (Score:2)
No need for that. Wine (and Winex) will play Warcraft III.
And according to Blizzard and their crushing of bnetd, it's rather the opposite (62.3% of Linux users have a (warezed) version of Warcraft III)
Re:Other survey results... (Score:5, Funny)
JonWho? (Score:1)
It's been so long since I did this, I forgot about JonKatz.
Re:Other survey results... (Score:1)
44.1% - Tighty Whiteys
22.3% - Flappin' in the wind, baby!
These numbers can't be accurate, as it leaves only a possible 1.3% for "CowboyNeal"!
Re:Other survey results... (Score:1)
80% of all percentages are made up on the spot.
Re:Other survey results... (Score:1)
Just to add my 2 cents, I call that "going freestyle"
Re:Other survey results... (Score:2)
not a complete survey (Score:1, Funny)
Hmmmm (Score:1)
Survey (Score:1)
It would be interesting to see the results. Of course, I have no idea how you would keep fraud for messing up the stats for such a thing.
The study recommends free software for govmnt. (Score:1, Informative)
It goes as far as recommending that EU states adopt legislation similar to the one proposed in Argentina, Perú, Colombia and others, mandating the use of free software in government for security reasons. Section 4.2
+1: Very, very insightful (Score:1)
(it seems that you've really read the documents)
Majority? (Score:3, Insightful)
Gnome 32.52%
KDE 30.05%
Mac 2.3%
Pure Text 8.37%
Windows 3.56%
Other 23.19%
Since when is 32.52% a majority? This is less than one third, and certainly not more than half, which is waht was indicated by the summary. Of course, I am an idiot for expecting accuracy on /., right?
Missing question (Score:2)
I really wish they had asked how people find time to develop open-source software. We couldn't expect completely honest answers, of course, but it's always interesting to see how many people not only do open-source work when they're supposed to be doing something else (e.g. paid work or study) but even admit that they do so. A similar question would be about what effects the expenditure of time on open-source projects has had on other aspects of people's lives - e.g. flunked out of school, got fired, lost a girlfriend, etc.
I know that many do open-source work entirely on their own time (or get paid to do it) and manage to find a balance between that and other aspects of their lives. I don't mean to imply otherwise. I just think that any sociological study of open-source developers should pay at least some attention to this "darker side" in addition to the by-now-overdone philosophical and work-habit questions.
vi rules (Score:1)
Re:Vi and emacs (Score:1)
I agree with you except in this (Score:1)
America is run by a mod of globalist, multiculturalists, homosexual Jews. Nader is a sucker. Join The National Alliance [natall.com] (there's even a Canadian Chapter [natall.ca])