ICFP 2003 Programming Contest Starts June 28th 33
mvw writes "The web pages for the
ICFP 2003 programming contest
are online!
It starts Saturday, 28th June 0:00 GMT.
As the time zone hints, this year it is organized in Sweden." From the rules page: "All programmers are invited to enter the contest, either individually or in teams. The contest offers direct, head-to-head comparison of language technology and programming skill. We have a range of prizes for the winners: cash awards, books, invitations to the conference for students, and, of course, unlimited bragging rights. The prizes will be awarded at ICFP 2003 in Uppsala this August."
Greenwich = Sweden? (Score:3, Interesting)
GMT, (Greenwich Mean Time [greenwichmeantime.com]) -> Sweden?
Greenwich is in Sweden?
Re:Greenwich = Sweden? (Score:2)
Re:Greenwich = Sweden? (Score:2)
Regards,
Marc
Re:Greenwich = Sweden? (Score:2)
I don't quite follow what you mean with "rest of Europe", but if you're talking about CET (Central European Time) which Sweden also belongs to it's currently GMT+2 (due to daylight-savings time).
Even Greenwich is currently GMT+1, because GMT does not make daylight savings changes...
Isn't this a month early? (Score:3, Interesting)
Personlly I look forward to IOCCC, much more interesting competition. But that contest hasn't been open for nearly two years now.
Re:Isn't this a month early? (Score:2)
Me too. For better organizing my schedule this year, I tried to find out the approximate date of the contest months ago already. But t seems my mail never reached the final contest organizing people, or they never answered.
Only thanks to a friendly computer scientist, to whom I wrote first and who has only remotely to do with the contest, I found out about the date .. just three days in advance.
So I hope next year the date will be much
Re:Isn't this a month early? (Score:1)
Re:Isn't this a month early? (Score:1)
What I like about the ICFP is the lack of restrictions. You can solve the problem using whatever tools and programming languages you like, as an individual or as part of a team. I don't think there are any other major programming contests like that.
Re:Isn't this a month early? (Score:1)
Some wise man is going to make a RPPC (Readable Perl Programming Contest) some day.
I think obfusicatin C is a cool idea of a contest. Its fun to try and figure out what other programmers come up with. And its kind of fun to try an entry out.
What I like about the ICFP is the lack of restrictions.
Aw heck, in the IOCCC you can solve whatever problem you want, you have to use a specific language though.
In ICFP you have to solve their specific problem with any language you want.
Six of one, half a doze
Re:Isn't this a month early? (Score:2)
Some wise man is going to make a RPPC (Readable Perl Programming Contest) some day.
Scary. It would prove several of me beliefs completely wrong.
Re:Isn't this a month early? (reposted) (Score:3, Interesting)
Some wise man is going to make a RPPC (Readable Perl Programming Contest) some day.
I think obfusicatin C is a cool idea of a contest. Its fun to try and figure out what other programmers come up with. And its kind of fun to try an entry out.
What I like about the ICFP is the lack of restrictions.
Aw heck, in the IOCCC you can solve whatever problem you want, you h
Speculation... (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Speculation... (Score:2)
Mailing List (Score:1)
Obligatory (Score:3, Insightful)
I'm just a little bitter thats all. I had the scoop on this almost a week ago, sigh.
But on the on-topic side, I plan on participating and doing my entry in PHP, just for kicks
Re:Obligatory (Score:4, Interesting)
Team Slashdot?
Re:Obligatory (Score:1)
I propose we work with:
LISP, Win2k and emacs.
Assuming that's ok with everyone we can get started.
Acronym (Score:5, Informative)
Also, interestingly, the contest allows any programming language to be entered, functional or not. Sounds like a challenge to the procedural and OO programmers out there
Re:Acronym (Score:1)
Re:Acronym (Score:2)
Bah, objects are just a poor man's closures. Or was it the other way around...
Either way, if the people I work with could make any of their objects function properly, it would make my debugging sessions much easier! ;-)
Re:Acronym (Score:2)
As for allowing any programming language, well, the programming language "SORTA" won IOCCC's best in show back in '91...
Regards,
--
*Art
in the faq (Score:2, Informative)
Will the CPU speed of the computer used for the task matter? (Not for the development task, but for computing task results.) Will people with just a 166-MHz machine be disadvantaged against people with current hardware?
Give me a faster computer anyday. I can't see a situation in which a faster machine would not be some advantage. However, the speed of your CPU will not directly influence your placing.
Interesting to see what the competition will be...
Shameless Karmawhoring. (Score:2)
A time zone converter [timezoneconverter.com] for all your needs.
Open Source Erlang Web Site Offline (Score:2)
Here is some info what happened:
A few people have asked me "what's happening with Erlang.org?". I called Kent today. Seems they've moved some servers from one building to another and it's taking longer than expected to get the external network connection up again (i.e. several days). Until they do that, erlang.org, erlang.se and the mailing list all don't work.
The UU mirror seems ok:
Re:Open Source Erlang Web Site Offline (Score:2)
See you.
What? (Score:1)
It has begun. (Score:3, Informative)
Re:It has begun. (Score:2)
Three days were not much for that task. I wasted most of the time writing tools and getting a proper implementation of the specs.
Ideal would have been a team of 1 toolmaker, 1 tester, 1 strategy/optimizing guy, 1 coordinator. And of course more libs in the background ready for various optimization task, plus something to hack together visual editors very quickly.
I wish I had known better ways to interface to the GIMP, it turned out to be a useful editor for me, but i only managed file base