Another Review on Sun's Java Desktop 25
An anonymous reader inputs: "Mad Penguin has posted a comprehensive review of Sun's JDS 2003 Linux distribution, and it is one of the most honest I have seen: "The developers behind this effort need to focus on what makes a desktop OS great: ease of use, multimedia support, and simple/accessible networking features." Without that, the author says that the distro cannot survive. there was also mention of Project Looking Glass, a 3D java desktop environment for Linux that is still under heavy development." Compare this review with the first one that was posted, back in December.
paraphrasing jurassic park (Score:2, Funny)
Re:paraphrasing jurassic park (Score:1)
J all over the world (Score:5, Funny)
Check this screenshot [osnews.com] for example.
Re:J all over the world (Score:5, Insightful)
A lot of thought should go into a program's name, but one of the things that matters the least is trying to reflect in the name the language or GUI kit used to develop it.
Re:J all over the world (Score:2, Interesting)
Additionally, remember that is a 1.0 product. It's going to be a couple of years before it is fully matured.
Also, Sun has a vested interest in a) showcasing the Java desktop apps and b) giving some meaning to the "Java" in Java Desktop System.
Re:J all over the world (Score:2)
I would hate to see Sun make the same mistake, especially considering they have the advantage of seeing what Microsoft did previously.
Re:J all over the world (Score:1, Informative)
It's an issue we deal with at every press conference, trade show, etc. One thing that is important to realize is that the product groups had no real input in the decision, it came down from on high.
Re:J all over the world (Score:1)
Second, does the name "Sun Java Desktop" imply implemenaton in Java? Sure you could choose to see it that way, but it doesn't actually CLAIM to be implemented in Java. It might merely imply it's a good platform for running Java applications.
Re:J all over the world (Score:1)
That's only true if there is no benefit in leveraging said language. With Java there is, especially because it means different things to different people.
Reviewer Missed the Point... (Score:2, Informative)
Documentation and Administration are two obvious pitfalls with the package (and both are recognized by Sun). Most of the complaints however have nothing to do with a _business_ oriented distribution.
In other words, this (1) wasn't a ver
Obligatory Disclaimer (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Obligatory Disclaimer (Score:2)
I can imagine other Java products from Sun too, like JavaCPU (former Sparc).
Re:Obligatory Disclaimer (Score:2)
Sun will never rename Solaris or any of its other well-established brands. Not because it would be dumb. But because they're totally in love with the idea of "selling the brand". Which means that you don't get rid of brands that are working for you. (Good idea!) It also means you try an squeeze everything you can out of your best brands, ev
I'll still get it (Score:2)
What Java? (Score:1)
ugly themege (Score:2, Insightful)
I'm sure this Java Desktop rocks... (Score:1)
A REAL Java OS (Score:3, Informative)
JNode [sourceforge.net]
great desktop, not much user support (Score:1, Informative)
However it is lacking good customer service/support. Since service is included in the cost of the OS, I though I might as well test their reponse time. When I called the support center, I had to leave a message. I did receive a call back from within 2 hours, but I missed it as I steppd out for a meeting. After
Other 3d desktops (Score:1)
Good topic (Score:1)