Skype Branches Out 15
Golygydd Max writes "Our site, Techworld, reports that Skype, the voice over IP people have just developed an API that allows web developers to include Skype technology on their websites. Although it's a bit clunky at the moment, it could prove to be a useful tool for tech support."
first place it will be used... (Score:5, Insightful)
Voice Quality (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Voice Quality (Score:3, Informative)
bkw
Re:Voice Quality (Score:5, Interesting)
I think it's one of the coolest "free" projects I've ever seen.
Re:Voice Quality (Score:3, Interesting)
Given this company's track record, Skype is likely to be riddled with spyware. I'm not sure I would like to trust my personal communication to such a company.
Re:Voice Quality (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Voice Quality (Score:3, Informative)
According to this article [66.102.7.104], Skype licensed a proprietary codec from Global IP Sound [globalipsound.com].
As for spyware, a little research into the history of the Kazaa client would reveal that the people who introduced the spyware did so after they bought the technology from the developers. The Skype people are the origin
Re:Voice Quality (Score:5, Informative)
You can read more about it on the VoIP Info Wiki [voip-info.org].
Wish (Score:2)
Comparison (Score:2)
Re:Comparison (Score:2, Insightful)
Skype/hype ? (Score:2)
It uses non-standard protocols. Properitary things.
My prediction is that in the not so distant future, more good standarized (e.g SIP) VoIP solutions will be developed, and have
more success attributed more vendors/solutions working together.
Where will that leave skype ?
Re:Skype/hype ? (Score:2)
I see Cisco, Nokia, Sony, Alcatel and others starting to develop
SIP phones, and some telecompanies starting to push them to end users.
I don't see many doing the same with iLBC, which again, is not a
standard. And, heck iLBC is just a goddamn codec. Not signalling. Learn
the diffrence.
Missing option = the link! (Score:1)
http://www.skype.com/