Open Source Code Maintainability Analyzed 264
gManZboy writes "Four computer scientists have done a formal analysis of five Open Source software projects to determine how being "Open Source" contributes to or inhibits source code maintainability. While they admit further research is needed, they conclude that open source is no magic bullet on this particular issue, and argue that Open Source software development should strive for even greater code maintainability." From the article: "The disadvantages of OSS development include absence of complete documentation or technical support. Moreover, there is strong evidence that projects with clear and widely accepted specifications, such as operating systems and system applications, are well suited for the OSS development model. However, it is still questionable whether systems like ERP could be developed successfully as OSS projects. "
Results would be fairer (Score:3, Funny)
I tried to read it but... (Score:5, Funny)
bah! (Score:3, Funny)
Haven't had a problem yet....
Those who forget history are doomed to reimplement (Score:2, Funny)
Ah yes. (Score:2, Funny)
Only one man... (Score:3, Funny)
...dared to challenge this article.
(insert rousing action-series music) Hercules!
Re:Those who forget history are doomed to reimplem (Score:1, Funny)
Re:I tried to read it but... (Score:1, Funny)
Re:bah! (Score:4, Funny)
Nothing to be ashamed of, that's a pretty average size.
bah! "experts" (Score:2, Funny)
I stopped reading at that point.
If they think they're so smart, those 4 guys are welcome to fork whatever project they want and do it themselves.
Re:Results would be fairer (Score:2, Funny)
Helpful tip: avoid the breakfast cereal aisle of any supermarket in the U.S., lest the bewildering array of choices and your own indecision cause you to starve.
further research indeed (Score:3, Funny)
It's not usually all that hard to get people to "admit" that they'd like more funding.
disclaimer: that was not meant as a rant, I work in science myself. But "more research is needed" is a running joke in the community. It doesn't detrect from the work, but every publication on the planet includes it, and every serious reader treats it as a mere formality and silently ignores it.