No Respect for Windows Open Source 551
man_of_mr_e writes "Shaun Walker, one of the founding developers of the DotNetNuke Portal/CMS has written an interesting piece about Open Source software on the Windows platform. "It's hard being an open source project on the Microsoft platform. Because no matter how hard you try to exemplify true open source ideals, you will not get any respect from the non-Microsoft community." He also says "There are Open Source zealots who believe that unless an application is part of a stack which includes 100% Open Source services and components, that it can not claim to be Open Source. [...] But does this "stack" argument actually make any sense?""
Re:A lot like Star Trek... (Score:4, Funny)
Lets be serious here... (Score:3, Funny)
We're all geeks here, no need to deny it.
Re:A lot like Star Trek... (Score:5, Funny)
I could: Apache 2.0.x [secunia.com] had 28 security advisories since release (2 still unpatched at the time of writing), while IIS 6.0 [secunia.com] had only 2 until now, and they were both patched.
Re:Let me rephrase it a bit... more... (Score:3, Funny)
Good heavens, don't do that!
There are only a few vendors who make FPGAs with enough gates to run a full MIPS core (you'll need more than the mimimum to boot an interesting operating system). And then you're locked in!
Unless the FPGA design is open source, you're a complete hypocrite, worse than any Windows user, because you preach open source and are living in sin.
Re:Open source is... (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Open source is... (Score:3, Funny)
Re:A lot like Star Trek... (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Not true (Score:4, Funny)
In VI America, you use text editor. In Stallman Russia, text editor uses you!