





Oracle Is Latest To Take On VMware 109
BobB writes "Oracle is going after its piece of the hot virtualization market by introducing an open source Xen-based hypervisor to compete against those from Novell, Red Hat, and VMware. Oracle VM, unveiled Monday at the Oracle OpenWorld convention in San Francisco, enables virtualization on Oracle and non-Oracle software applications and on the Linux and Windows OSs. It also operates on industry-standard x86- and x86-64-based servers. Oracle claims it offers virtualization at a lower cost than competitors can." VMware stock dropped over 10% on the news; Oracle's stock rose. The market was not punishing Oracle for the unpatched zero-day vulnerability (public exploit available) that the company won't patch until Jan. 15.
Isn't this just Oracle re-branding RHEL 5.1 (Score:5, Interesting)
And how can this make VMWare stock drop by 10%? Xen ain't new (or great).
Sorta makes sense (Score:3, Interesting)
Then they can ship pre-built VM images with oracle already installed and configured. Thus, the database server becomes a VM appliance (not quite a dishwasher yet...)
Easier to support (ie lower costs) especially if the VM runs Linux. As much as I hate Oracle, this following their 'legal theft' of RHEL it all starts to hang together.
However, it remains to be seen if they can build up their support side so that is basically 'sucks less' than it does now. There is a danger that they are spreading themselves too thin.
I don't think VMWare should get too worried by this. The overall market for VM's is huge. As long as the quality of their product stays high then their market will grow along with the overall market for VM Systems.
Re:Any word on if it works (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Can they compete? (Score:3, Interesting)
Yeah, me too. I spent some time at Oracle and while marketing paid lip service to the Microsoft stack, the division that did projects couldn't be less interesting. In a big department meeting, I asked the department head whether we will do something with C# besides Java. The room actually laughed. The department head didn't know what C# was.
Re:Any word on if it works (Score:2, Interesting)
Lars
Re:you're probably right (Score:1, Interesting)
I've not heard that Oracle refuse to support systems installed on VMWare though. I think the last time we actually tried to get support from Oracle was, er, never. Our developers report bugs to them, and that's about it.
I suspect that if their refusal to support is true, then it's for bullshit reasons. Exactly what you'd expect from a company like Oracle, really.
Re:Can they compete? (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Can they compete? (Score:2, Interesting)
That's a pretty good point, but I think we can take it further.
If you're an investor, you have two ways to diversify your investments:
The former will always be easier to do--you just buy more stocks (or just go ahead and buy everything [vanguard.com]--and everything else [vanguard.com], too.
The latter is the only option available to people who are hyper-concentrated in one company's stock and can't trade out--i.e., people [wikipedia.org] who control companies [wikipedia.org] that are really big [oracle.com].
This is not to say that diversifying a company's business makes no sense--there's no reason in principle why it can't work, and in fact, bringing many things under one roof can achieve efficiencies that separate companies can't. But the point is that there is a definite potential for a conflict of interest between majority and minority shareholders.
And here, as you can guess, I think you're wrong. If you control a company, and that company forms the bulk of your net worth, there is nothing sentimental behind your desire to diversify your business. The only way you can retain all that wealth is by holding on to your stock, and diversifying the business can protect its value.