Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system


Forgot your password?
Education Programming News

Stanford CS101 Adopts JavaScript 255

mikejuk writes "In case further proof were needed that JavaScript shall indeed inherit the earth, we have the news that Stanford has adopted JavaScript to teach CS101 — Introduction to Computing Principles: 'The essential ideas of computing via little phrases of JavaScript code.' You can even try it out for yourself at Stanford's course page."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Stanford CS101 Adopts JavaScript

Comments Filter:
  • by Dahamma ( 304068 ) on Monday July 11, 2011 @03:14PM (#36724992)

    The summary is awful.

    First, this isn't even recent news, it was added *last* year.

    Second, this isn't an intro course for CS majors (or even any engineering major, or hell, even a non-engineering major interested in programming). It's basically a really high level intro to computers and "programming principles" for "fuzzies" with an irrational fear of computers (which as you say, is definitely a small group at Stanford).

    Though the lecturer (Nick Parlante) is awesome, so it's probably a fun class, and might even get some people interested in taking the real intro to programming class (CS106A).

  • Re:Ideal IDE (Score:4, Informative)

    by _0xd0ad ( 1974778 ) on Monday July 11, 2011 @03:24PM (#36725142) Journal

    Q) Can you tell me the difference between FIFO and LIFO?

    Javascript arrays have push(), pop(), shift(), and unshift() methods. If they fail to teach FIFO and LIFO, they can't blame it on Javascript.

  • Re:Ideal IDE (Score:3, Informative)

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday July 11, 2011 @03:26PM (#36725164)

    JS is indeed a bad language if you care at all about syntax or sanity.
    Here's a couple from Stackoverflow [].

    In JavaScript:
      '5' + 3 gives '53'

      '5' - 3 gives 2

    the following construct
            id : 1234,
            title : 'Tony the Pony'

    is a syntax error due to the sneaky implicit semicolon insertion on the newline after return. The following works as you would expect though:
    return {
            id : 1234,
            title : 'Tony the Pony'

  • by comp.sci ( 557773 ) on Monday July 11, 2011 @04:04PM (#36725698)
    To clarify, this class is a cursory overview of how computers work, a few basics on whats makes them tick and how to make them do fun things. This class is meant as a general education "learn about computers" effort, this is NOT their intro to CS class. Look at CS106X for programming, CS103X for discrete math, ... To repeat: Stanford is NOT teaching CS majors javascript, they are showing off what computer can do for humanities students with CS101. On a side note: I can see why most commenters would not catch this but how did the editors miss this obvious fact? Do a tiny bit of background research (aka click their link) and you will see how this summary is entirely misleading.

Civilization, as we know it, will end sometime this evening. See SYSNOTE tomorrow for more information.