Top-Level Domain .App Is Now Open For General Registration (googleblog.com)
82
Christina Chiou Yeh, writing for Google Registry: On May 1 we announced .app, the newest top-level domain (TLD) from Google Registry. It's now open for general registration so you can register your desired .app name right now. We begin our journey with sitata.app, which provides real-time travel information about events like protests or transit strikes. Looks all clear, so our first stop is the Caribbean, where we use thelocal.app and start exploring. After getting some sun, we fly to the Netherlands, where we're feeling hungry. Luckily, picnic.app delivers groceries, right to our hotel. With our bellies full, it's time to head to India, where we use myra.app to order the medicine, hygiene, and baby products that we forgot to pack. Did we mention this was a business trip? Good thing lola.app helped make such a complex trip stress free. Time to head home now, so we slip on a hoodie we bought on ov.app and enjoy the ride.
But I already have .com for my DOS apps. (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
OSX already uses the .app extension for application bundles, so get ready for a new domain race for Apple developers.
Now we need .exe (Score:3)
It's high time we move all of .com to .exe.
Re: Now we need .exe (Score:2)
But then we'll have to process a bunch of extra headers that serve no purpose other than to make it compatible with platforms no one uses.
Re: (Score:1)
Nah, this is for your GEM applications - PAINT.APP, BASIC2.APP, and good ol' DOODLE.APP. :)
Found the LUDDITE! (Score:1)
Modern app appers only use APP apps on app.app/app!
Apps!
Nope. (Score:3)
Nope.
Re: (Score:2)
He's going to be re-elected because of you. Is that your plan?
Re: Nope. (Score:2)
What actually defines Trump voters is pro-life. Which party doesn't like responsibiliity again?
Re: Nope. (Score:2)
Now that selling TLDs is a thing, wouldn't it be easier to whitelist .com, .net, .org, .gov, and all the country TLDs?
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
I understand what you're saying, but on the other hand, I could see some possible value from increasing the number of TLDs.
One of the problems with the domain naming system is that there are a lot of squatters. For a long time, there's been a land-grab to gobble up every desirable .COM domain and hold out for a big payday. There are a lot of companies that go to buy a domain that matches the company name, only to find that [company-name].com is taken, and so are most of the variations that they would wan
Re: (Score:1)
Another way would be that if you register XYZ.com then any established business called XYZ can boot you out unless you can come up with a good idea why not.
I mean your friends might call you Mercedes. It might say that on your doorbell and business cards. But when I go to mercedes.com I'm looking for the car company, not you.
Re: (Score:3)
Another way would be that if you register XYZ.com then any established business called XYZ can boot you out unless you can come up with a good idea why not.
Right, like I said, there are various ways to try to solve the problem. However (and I'm sorry if this is rude), what you're suggesting is not a particularly good solution. It'd be courting controversy, and there'd bound to be a lot of administrative overhead.
Because think about this: What constitutes a "good idea why not"? Someone needs to come up with a set of reasons why it's ok to own a domain, and why not, when someone can have their ownership challenged, and when they can't. And then once the rul
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah you're right. It's too hard having laws about anything. Settle it with a duel, or perhaps scissors-paper-stone.
Re: (Score:2)
No, laws are good, but you don't want to make vague laws so every single thing that comes up needs to be settled in court. Especially when you're talking about things that involve a lot of small transactions, and there's a more technical solution available.
Re: Nope. (Score:2)
ok, but I buy fuckmercedes.com, Mercedes shouldn't be able to come along and suppress my speech because of my fair use of their trademark.
Re: (Score:2)
Makes me wonder... is cr.app already taken?
Done (Score:1)
With https://f.app the internet is now complete.
Re:Done (Score:4, Insightful)
With https://f.app/ [f.app] the internet is now complete.
I wonder if cr.app is taken yet...
Re:Done (Score:4, Funny)
I am more interested in beeront.app
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
f.app ...hahahahaha
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Apping app app app appers app (Score:4, Funny)
Only true appers app with appers.app.app.app. Only LUDDITES USE .COM. Appers.app.
But when... (Score:2)
When can I register .luddite domains?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: But when... (Score:2)
Oh the stupid things I would do if I were rich. I would turn .luddite into a web ring of conspiracy theory sites and joke sites about the Amish.
What a load of cr.app (Score:1)
This plethora of new TLDs are a godsend! (Score:3)
Re: (Score:1)
itsatr.app
Re: Looks like APK has even more work (Score:1)
Except you canâ(TM)t do it in a hosts file and it is trivial to blacklist tlds in a dns server that serves your home network - all your devices with one setting
URL for Apps? (Score:1)
Re: URL for Apps? (Score:1)
No, that's Apple's recent attempted re-definition of "app". The rest of the English speaking world has used "app" to mean something quite different for at least 20 years or so.
yes (Score:1)
Darn (Score:2)
z.app (Score:2)
z.app is already taken. How about a different name?
>> zz.app
zz.app is already taken. How about a different name?
>> zzz.app
zzz.app is already taken. How about a different name?
>> zzzz.app
zzzz.app is already taken. How about a different name?
>> zzzzz.app
zzzzz.app is already taken. How about a different name?
>> zzzzzz.app
zzzzzz.app is already taken. How about a different name?
>> zzzzzzz.app
How exciting! zzzzzzz.app is available.
Domain isn't what it used to be (Score:2)
Back in the early days you'd stick the topic name in front of ".com" and you'd find a website.
In those days search wasn't great. Webcrawler, AltaVista ?
Then along came google and we began to see invented names like Skype. In fact who had even heard of a "google" until then?
Naming became irrelevant as search ranking became everything.
When I look at my website and app's analytics I see an annual downward trend in website usage and an increase in app usage.
IMHO App store search is now king. App names are free
Re: Domain isn't what it used to be (Score:2)
Naming is definitely relevant to those search engine rankings.
Re: (Score:2)
> Then along came google and we began to see invented names like Skype. In fact who had even heard of a "google" until then?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?... [youtube.com]
whats.app (Score:2)
I was too slow, whats.app is taken :(
Those new TLD only interest search engine operators since we'll have no idea what kind of naming standard each site or service is using.
I'm already seeing things like bank.example1 as the URL, meanwhile the others still use www.example2.com. Soon example1.app ? Why?
Re: whats.app (Score:2)
They had a pre-sale where anyone with a corporate interest could register names associated to their businesses. It's unlikely you'd be able to find any good squattable .app domains.
Re: (Score:2)
As of this post, you can squat on shipl.app and try to sell it to Chip and Joanna Gaines.
Re: All these garbage TLDs (Score:2)
ok, but even those old names weren't all needed. We could have put everything on the .us domain. The fact is all those old TLDs were abused to host things they weren't inteded for. Personal homepage on .com? Misuse. News site on .org? Misuse. E-commerce site on .net? Misuse.
Having new TLDs makes it easier to find a reasonably good domain under a relevant TLD.
Even before TLD proliferation, a reasonably sized corporation would need to register all the 100+ country TLDs (or at least public ones). Adding a few
Re: is your mouth.app compatible with my cock.app? (Score:2)
So, you're new to Slashdot?
$250 domains? (Score:2)
Glad they're keeping the riff-raff out.
Re:$250 domains? - correction (Score:2)
Actually, it seems like some domains are listed for more than others, but most are $17/yr.
Currently $17 (along with most available ones): https://www.name.com/domain/se... [name.com]
Currently $250/yr for some reason: https://www.name.com/domain/se... [name.com]
News for nerds? Stuff that matters? (Score:2)
I can see how "New TLD open for general registration" can fall under news for nerds, but what's with the copy-pasta of a load of advertising copy for random companies who registered before it was opened to the public? How is that news for nerds or stuff that matters?